Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How do you define ATG,, criteria??

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    And I don't think there is only a certain number of guys like 100 that are atgs... A number is cool if your making a list or article but in practical purpose there is no set number

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Welsh Jon View Post
      Related questions: how many heavyweights would you consider atgs?

      I think only Ali and Louid have ATG heavyweight resumes. There are other heavyweight champions who are among the top 100 greatest ever, but all the rest are there more because of achievments at lower weights eg Ezzard Charles, Fitzsimmons, RJJ.

      Are there any other heavyweights that can be considered atgs based only on their heavyweight resumes?
      Sugar Adam Ali's ATG heavyweights in no order

      Johnson
      Louis
      Ali
      Frazier
      Foreman
      Tyson
      Holmes
      Lennox
      Holyfield
      Liston
      Vitali
      Wlad

      Ezzard and Moore but I consider labeling them light heavy

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali View Post
        I know this has probably been brought up before, but im not very good with the search engine,,,

        How i rank ATGs is h2h and then resume to clearly define a rank,, I usually ask myself who this fighter could beat at the absolute peak like tyson 86-88, manny 08-09, etc

        point in case, i rank hearns higher than mcclarin because no doubt in my mind hearns would beat mcclarin,,, but mcclarin and oscar are close, but i give the edge to mcclarin due to his resume

        Roy jones, tyson, and floyd have weak resumes compared to other ATGs but h2h they are nightmares for alot of people, same with the klitchkos,,,

        So basically i use "who could beat who" and when its close i use resume and career achievements



        what do you guys use to gauge ATG rankings
        I like your criteria and the cases in point you presented.

        Comment


        • #24
          'All Time Great' will essentially and eventually become a matter of personal taste, as people like various of the big fighters. You can have a measuring stick with resume, boxing skill, dominance, longevity, outside ring influence on society/politics, etc. Boxing fans are in general NOT objective individuals, even though some of you might claim so.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Welsh Jon View Post
            Related questions: how many heavyweights would you consider atgs?

            I think only Ali and Louid have ATG heavyweight resumes. There are other heavyweight champions who are among the top 100 greatest ever, but all the rest are there more because of achievments at lower weights eg Ezzard Charles, Fitzsimmons, RJJ.

            Are there any other heavyweights that can be considered atgs based only on their heavyweight resumes?
            I think one or two heavies can match Louis' resume.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali View Post
              Sugar Adam Ali's ATG heavyweights in no order

              Johnson
              Louis
              Ali
              Frazier
              Foreman
              Tyson
              Holmes
              Lennox
              Holyfield
              Liston
              Vitali
              Wlad

              Ezzard and Moore but I consider labeling them light heavy
              It's funny, I have been ridiculed by so many posters repeatedly for suggesting that Vitali is a HW ATG.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Weltschmerz View Post
                It's funny, I have been ridiculed by so many posters repeatedly for suggesting that Vitali is a HW ATG.
                He isn't. He's top 20 in my book, but his resume is simply too weak to be considered a top 10 of all times.

                Ali
                Louis
                Johnson
                Foreman
                Holmes
                Frazier
                Holyfield
                Tyson
                Lewis
                Liston
                Marciano
                Wlad

                - these are just the ones of the top of my head that Vitali can't compete with at all - after that it's debatable who ranks higher than who, but the likes of JJ Walcott, Wills, Dempsey, Charles, Tunney, Langford, Bowe etc also have better wins than Vitali imo. But then you can start arguing about longevity etc.

                Comment


                • #28
                  If this thread turns into some off topic Klitschko fight, bans will be handed out.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    To expand on my earlier point, if the definition of an ATG is someone who can be ranked in a p4p top 100 then the only heavyweights champs I know for sure would get in are Ali, Louis, Charles, Fitzsimmons, Dempsey, Spinks and RJJ and apart from the first 2 these guys did their best work at lower weights.

                    To be honest I have never attempted a top 100 p4p list but I can't think of many guys who could make it purely from his heavyweight resume.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by Welsh Jon View Post
                      To expand on my earlier point, if the definition of an ATG is someone who can be ranked in a p4p top 100 then the only heavyweights champs I know for sure would get in are Ali, Louis, Charles, Fitzsimmons, Dempsey, Spinks and RJJ and apart from the first 2 these guys did their best work at lower weights.

                      To be honest I have never attempted a top 100 p4p list but I can't think of many guys who could make it purely from his heavyweight resume.
                      Really? ...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP