Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

patterson vs. walcott

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Yogi:
    You're the one who is in no position to judge Walcott, Butterfly, if you've never heard of Tiger Jack Fox or Abe Simon...Fox was considered one of the very hardest p4p hitters during his time (#51 on Ring's Greatest Punchers) and is still to this day considered one of the hardest hitting Light Heavyweights of all-time. And you're obviously not familiar with Walcott taking the Abe Simon fight on last minute notice (two or three days), and their's still to this day arguments about the legitimacy of the knockout.

    Who else besides Louis & Marciano knocked out Walcott...Al Ettore? I don't know the specifics of that fight, but for someone who excuses Ali's early performances against the likes of Banks, Cooper, and Jones, you sure do have a hypocritical attitude when it comes to other fighters who are early in their careers.

    If you say Patterson had a better chin you obviously don't know enough about Walcott & his opponents to make an intelligent argument...Ever heard of fighters like Elmer 'Violent' Ray, Tommy Gomez, Lee Q. Murray, Curtis 'Hatchetman' Sheppard, Hein Ten Hoff, etc.? Probably not, but every single one of those fighters there were respected and sometimes feared for the great power in their punches, yet not a single one of them were able to stop Walcott or put him down for the count...And at least two of those guys cracked the Ring's Greatest Punchers list with Ray at #44 and Gomez at #72.

    Unlike Patterson who was rarely in there with a big puncher (and was getting KO'd when he was), there were plenty of times when Walcott proved himself capable of taking the power of the hardest punching Heavyweights of his generation.
    This basically sums up the total of butterfly's posts in regards to fighters from the 1960's and 1970's. He will then tell you that none of those fights with Walcott matter, because those fighters weren't as good as Liston or Johansson. Maybe Walcott was knocked out by a guy who couldn't hit as hard as Liston, but Liston knocked Patterson out lightning quick; twice. Walcott rebounded better than Patterson ever did from a powerful knock down, and he was also a far less timid fighter. Who you would rather have on your resume doesn't matter. Walcott was clearly a tougher individual with better defense.

    Does this mean that he beats Patterson? No, because their losses don't matter once they'd step into the ring with each other. Also, stating that you have never heard of the fighters who floored Walcott weakens your argument further, because it proves that your knowledge of this sport is very limited and specific (ie: the era surrounding and including Ali).

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by butterfly1964
      punching power goes to patterson, speed go to patterson, defense goes to patterson, chin goes to patterson, size about the same.
      Some of your comments are baseless. DEFENSE to patterson? i dont think so, Walcott was a defensive fighter, and excellent at it. I would say walcott, he was technically better then patterson and i believe after a few rounds would be able to adapt. He used lots of feints, and slips etc.. I think he would trouble patterson and eventually knock him out.

      Comment


      • #23
        Is it possible Butterfly that you always exaggerate the capabilities of fighters in the 60's and 70's because that was the time in which Ali was king, and thus having greater competiton creates a perception of him being god-like. Dont get me wrong i think the 60s and 70s in regard to fighters had the most depth, and Ali was the greatest boxer of all time... but don't you think you have a tendancy to exaggerate a lil?

        Comment


        • #24
          Another thing while im at it. Have you noticed that all your arguments are always based around statistics? STYLES MAKE FIGHTS and its them two in the ring that matter. You should be focusing on their capabilities primarily.

          Comment


          • #25
            bump......

            Comment


            • #26
              this one's a tough call, I think Walcott winning this one by late round TKO.

              Comment


              • #27
                a close fight but i think patterson speed would be the telling factor walcott would hurt patterson a few times but i say patterson by late ko.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Defense Jersey Joe Walcott
                  Chin Jersey Joe Walcott
                  power Jersey Joe Walcott
                  speed Floyd Patterson
                  skill equal

                  so I would go with Jersey Joe Walcott

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    I'll give credit to you B'fly for bumping a thread in which you were

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by butterfly1964 View Post
                      lol, i knew someone would say something like that. watcott had a better chin? patterson's chin is far superior to watcott. if you compare the guys who ko'd patterson to the guys who ko'd watcott then there is no contest! patterson has a stronger chin, is faster, and has more punching power. patterson in 6 if it goes that far.
                      PATTERSON had a better chin ? WALCOTT had by FAR the superior chin.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP