Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who has the best resume in boxing history

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Post
    Well Ray... As i have said above, i have not attended professional gyms or had pro trainers like what you claim to have had. But i would like to bet you, i know more about the sport of boxing in historical terms, more about the pro fighters and champions of the sport than you could possible dream of knowing. in fact i would say i have forgotten more about boxing than you know.
    Feel free Ray to ask me anything whatsoever on the sport of boxing. Try to find something which is not on the internet Ray.... And don't forget Ray, i asked you a question only a few weeks back, and guess what Ray.. You had not a ****ing clue my friend. Yet you claimed you trained the ****ing guy at that time.
    Well i must say ,i gave you green for that one ,i couldn't have said it better myself ,this ray is a .......

    Comment


    • #92
      Again I never claimed to be Tyson trainer, I merely stated I worked pads with him a number of times AT Cus's gym AT Cus's house!
      Second not knowing his own nick name isn't that big of a deal if you think it is thats fine by me.
      I aske about mentor affiliations because having knowledge of the sports history doesn't mean you know anything about techniques. I knew Jimmy Jacobs and Jimmy was a library in his self and knew a little about boxing techniques but being a student of boxing history doesn't mean you know squat about the "fight"!
      Can you speak or write without using the word "****in" every other second?
      You sound off like a child, you need explitives to show how "meaningful" you are hahahaha!!!

      question for sonybox2;
      explain to me how you teach an "inside left hook/upper cut, Mexican style"
      this is taught by every Mexican trainer worth his salt and the technique is NEVER used by American or Euro fighters.
      I was taught by Gaspar Ortega when i was a young fellow learning my craft.

      be my guest, and stop cussing every other sentence...

      be back later, out for breakfast.........
      Last edited by Ray Corso; 05-28-2015, 02:48 PM.

      Comment


      • #93
        question for sonyboy2; Lets go with initiating a clinche to nuetralize inside power.
        Yet still working a free hand to show the ref your busy.

        please explain.........
        Last edited by Ray Corso; 05-28-2015, 02:49 PM.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Post
          Hagler was TWICE beaten by Kevin Finnegan but resulted to dirty tactics, butting Finnegan repeatedly. resulting in victories for Hagler. Finnegan required over 60 stitches to his face due to cuts from Haglers deliberate headbutts... Hagler was a very good fighter and champion, yet as champion he chose to fight fighters from lower weight divisions in Duran, Hearns, Mugabi, Obel, Antuofermo, Leonard... Sugar Ray Seales could hardly see daylight when Hagler beat him. Caveman Lee, Monroe, Watts & Colbert were not Championship caliber fighters... Tony Sibson was nothing better than European Level and Juan Domingo Roldan (floored Hagler) was deliberately thumbed out of the fight.. Marvin Hagler was a good fighter but thats all. Ray Leonard kicked his ass after nearly 5yrs out of the ring.. Sugar Ray Robinson, Roy Jones Jr. James Toney, Bernard Hopkins would have very little trouble taking care of Marvin Hagler.
          Antuofermo was the MIDDLEWEIGHT CHAMPION when Hagler fought him. Was Marvin (who had been ducked for years) supposed to wait for a bigger middleweight champion?

          Typical garbage from Funnyboyx and his transparent agendas.

          Comment


          • #95
            By my (incomplete) reckoning the fighter who fought and defeated the highest number of the best fighters of their respective time periods was Tony Canzoneri with Sugar Ray Robinson only just behind.

            Comment


            • #96
              Thats true about Tony he falls short in the head to head comparisons with Robinson but Tony was a terrific boxer.
              Ray

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by Humean View Post
                By my (incomplete) reckoning the fighter who fought and defeated the highest number of the best fighters of their respective time periods was Tony Canzoneri with Sugar Ray Robinson only just behind.
                Tony is highly rated and fought amazing competition but did not do it over a lengthy time period when compared to ray

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by Ray Corso View Post
                  Thats true about Tony he falls short in the head to head comparisons with Robinson but Tony was a terrific boxer.
                  Ray
                  Originally posted by rightsideup View Post
                  Tony is highly rated and fought amazing competition but did not do it over a lengthy time period when compared to ray
                  I certainly think Robinson was a better fighter than Canzoneri and that he also had a better career. I was just pointing out that I think Canzoneri might have fought and defeated the largest concentration of the best fighters of his era than any other fighter has ever done in their respective eras - even more than Robinson.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    I might just agree, Tony was a top flight fighter who does well in any era.












                    sonyboy2..............How do you control what punches your opponent throws on the inside using your head?
                    I'll wait!


                    Well maybe not, see you tomorrow I'm sure you'll have all the answers and probably options too. ps; their not on google or ******* these are found in a GYM!

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Humean View Post
                      I certainly think Robinson was a better fighter than Canzoneri and that he also had a better career. I was just pointing out that I think Canzoneri might have fought and defeated the largest concentration of the best fighters of his era than any other fighter has ever done in their respective eras - even more than Robinson.
                      Thats a great observation. I think the stat itself is one of those stats that should hold more water...like for example, statistically validating clutch hitting in baseball though a more refined on base percentage stat.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP