Originally posted by Barnburner
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who has the best resume in boxing history
Collapse
-
Originally posted by crold1 View PostWhen you combine having a bunch of bad ass victories with the curve for difficulty, it's probably Langford. He didn't beat all the top guys he fought, but he faced the best fighters from Lightweight to Heavyweight, beating Joe Gans in 1903 and knocking out Flowers in 1922 (with 3-4 more years of fights in him after). In between, he missed almost no one and beat more than he didn't with a draw against Walcott, a newspaper push with Ketchell, a loss to Johnson but wins over the rest of that murderer's row of avoided bad asses. Greb isn't far off, but he didn't have Dempsey at all (vs. a loss to Johnson).
Comment
-
Originally posted by El Manos View PostI realize that but you can't pretend that Ali or Robinson were not de****able as human beings. They both were. I also understand Robinson had a good resume but for my money I would go with Pep,Greb,and Duran with the better resumes. I think Robinson gets overrated because people believe they're supposed to say he's the greatest.
yeah, those guys post in NSB.
willie pep < ray robinson. that's something you'll have to learn to accept. this is coming from an italian.
when some of the best posters on a website with 200K members call you a racist, well, i believe them.
Comment
-
Originally posted by New England View Postyeah, those guys post in NSB.
willie pep < ray robinson. that's something you'll have to learn to accept. this is coming from an italian.
when some of the best posters on a website with 200K members call you a racist, well, i believe them.
Comment
-
Comment