Dempsey's "duck" of Greb

[joeandthebums]

Yet that is how you yourself made the forum opperate.. what you are doing here is trying to imply Casey is wrong, but not spitting it out. but trying to put the blame onto me.

I have not implied the author of the article is wrong, but asked you, who originally attributed a quote to Langford to provide supporting evidence.

You provided a link to an article with different information - I then stated that your evidence was an article which included a single sentence with no source.

I finished by asking you to provide evidence to support your original quote, which you have failed to do and instead prefer this back-and-forth.

[sonnyboyx2]

I have not implied the author of the article is wrong, but asked you, who originally attributed a quote to Langford to provide supporting evidence.

You provided a link to an article with different information - I then stated that your evidence was an article which included a single sentence with no source.

I finished by asking you to provide evidence to support your original quote, which you have failed to do and instead prefer this back-and-forth.

you keep avoiding the questions i put to you, so for the final time:

Are you claiming Casey quoting Langford, claiming he said "Dempsey was the greatest heavyweight he EVER seen"...is not a source?.. is not true?

I did not provide "Different information" to the link..what you are trying here is to "split hairs" by claiming i said different to what Casey claims he said. Well i am saying exactly the same as what Casey claims Langford said about Dempsey..

Langford for your knowledge actually said much more about how great Dempsey was than what Casey quoted. but you would obviously look for an angle to rubbish it.

[joeandthebums]

you keep avoiding the questions i put to you, so for the final time:

I have address them but will again:

Are you claiming Casey quoting Langford, claiming he said "Dempsey was the greatest heavyweight he EVER seen"...is not a source?.. is not true?

No it is no more a reliable source than your statement, despite the author status, as it does not have supporting evidence.

I did not provide "Different information" to the link..what you are trying here is to "split hairs" by claiming i said different to what Casey claims he said. Well i am saying exactly the same as what Casey claims Langford said about Dempsey..

I do not believe I am splitting hairs by addressing different statements. This is not a verbal conversation, there is time prior to communicating to ensure your message is correct.

Langford for your knowledge actually said much more about how great Dempsey

Then please provide it to support your statement and allow me to expand my knowledge on the subject.

but you would obviously look for an angle to rubbish it.

I simply have asked for supporting evidence, at no point have I gave an opinion on Langford or Dempsey.

[billeau2]

+1



Mods cannot be blocked.

In that case you just proved that we are not single conscious en****** that imagine all that is around us onto which reality is a mere reflection of self....If mods can't be blocked than there must necessarily be at all times, in every universe, at least two separate consciousnesses to make a thread.

[The Old LefHook]

In that case you just proved that we are not single conscious en****** that imagine all that is around us onto which reality is a mere reflection of self....If mods can't be blocked than there must necessarily be at all times, in every universe, at least two separate consciousnesses to make a thread.

You assume the mods are not bots.

[sonnyboyx2]

I have address them but will again:



No it is no more a reliable source than your statement, despite the author status, as it does not have supporting evidence.



I do not believe I am splitting hairs by addressing different statements. This is not a verbal conversation, there is time prior to communicating to ensure your message is correct.



Then please provide it to support your statement and allow me to expand my knowledge on the subject.



I simply have asked for supporting evidence, at no point have I gave an opinion on Langford or Dempsey.

the link i posted included email address so i think you should contact casey

[BattlingNelson]

In that case you just proved that we are not single conscious en****** that imagine all that is around us onto which reality is a mere reflection of self....If mods can't be blocked than there must necessarily be at all times, in every universe, at least two separate consciousnesses to make a thread.

Damn. I think my brain exploded.

You assume the mods are not bots.

Or maybe just a short circuit.

[joeandthebums]

the link i posted included email address so i think you should contact casey

So you do not have any supporting evidence yourself? Despite previous comments;

i have supporting evidence right here at hand. but you can sing for it.

check google archives, it is well documented there.

[sonnyboyx2]

So you do not have any supporting evidence yourself? Despite previous comments;

yes i do.....

[joeandthebums]

yes i do.....

But are not prepared to provide it?