Robinson lost to fighters that were journey men….he had bad balance , he was reckless , had terrible defence and padded his career with fighters that had losses in double figures.
for his time he was great but it’s convenient that all the fights that he lost are somehow forgot about.
over half his wins were against very poor boxers which helped pad his career
even Jake Lamotta he was just a walking punchbag and yet so much is placed on it.
just use your eyes and watch how bad he really is.
hagler would have sliced him to ribbons and hagler would also have beaten Robinson
leonard had more accuracy , better IQ , quicker feet , fight on the front foot or back foot and had insane stamina as a welterweight
it was a different era where fighters were matched week in week out against fighters regardless of how bad they were and the culture was Friday night fight club.
As I said Robinson was great in his era but he was not as skilled as Leonard
for his time he was great but it’s convenient that all the fights that he lost are somehow forgot about.
over half his wins were against very poor boxers which helped pad his career
even Jake Lamotta he was just a walking punchbag and yet so much is placed on it.
just use your eyes and watch how bad he really is.
hagler would have sliced him to ribbons and hagler would also have beaten Robinson
leonard had more accuracy , better IQ , quicker feet , fight on the front foot or back foot and had insane stamina as a welterweight
it was a different era where fighters were matched week in week out against fighters regardless of how bad they were and the culture was Friday night fight club.
As I said Robinson was great in his era but he was not as skilled as Leonard
Comment