Originally posted by slicksouthpaw16
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Does James Toney Have Better WINS Than Roy Jones Jr?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by wmute View PostI see... so you are suggesting that Nunn took him lightly, and hence we should put an(other) asterisk next to that W for Toney. Ok...
Comment
-
Originally posted by wmute View PostYou think Toney would have stopped Nunn, have those incredible fights with McCallum, partially wipe out 60, then move up to 68 and beat Barkley, Littles etc while slacking off and not training as you said he had a history of?
Comment
-
Originally posted by slicksouthpaw16 View PostUh no, that was never typed. I said that to simply suggest that THERE WAS NO STEP UP IN COMP FOR NUNN BECAUSE HE HAD FOUGHT ACTUAL CHAMPIONS AND HAD REIGNED FOR YEARS GOING INTO THE TONEY FIGHT. TONEY WAS RELATIVELY INEXPERIENCED, CERTAINLY AT TOP LEVEL SO THERE WASN'T THIS "STEP UP ON TONEYS CALIBER" AS YOU SUGGEST. You should understand now.
Nunn managed to beat fighters not named James Toney even if he had a habit
Toney managed to beat fighters not name Roy Jones even with his poor habits.
And then... they just met someone who was too good for that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by slicksouthpaw16 View PostHe was an on and off type of fighter. Sometimes he would come in good shape and some times he'd slack off. Hell the reason why he even moved to 168 lbs was because he ate himself up there.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wmute View PostToney is the greatest fighter on Nunn's resume, that is by definition a step up.
Nunn managed to beat fighters not named James Toney even if he had a habit
Toney managed to beat fighters not name Roy Jones even with his poor habits.
And then... they just met someone who was too good for that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by slicksouthpaw16 View PostNo, he turned out to be the greatest fighter on his resume, he certainly wasn't at the time they fought. That's like saying Jones was the greatest fighter that Toney fought because of how well he turned out but in reality it was Nunn. It was Nunn back then and Jones overall.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wmute View PostAnd out of all fights, he chose to slack off for the Jones fight, rather than say Littles... how convenient, no?Last edited by slicksouthpaw16; 10-01-2011, 01:11 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wmute View Postand that goes to prove my point... thank you.
So let me get this straight, you feel that Jones was a greater fighter than Nunn at the time he beat Toney and Toney was a greater fighter than Barkley, Starling and Kalambay even though the best win on his record was Sosa (while not bad, is not where near great) at the time he fought Nunn.Last edited by slicksouthpaw16; 09-30-2011, 09:12 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by slicksouthpaw16 View PostYou have once again lost me. I said Nunn was the greatest fighter THAT TONEY FOUGHT UP TO THE JONES FIGHT BECAUSE JONES WAS NOT AS ESTABLISHED AS NUNN AT THE TIME. Overall yes, Jones did go on to become clearly greater than Nunn but that's irrelevant since we are basing it on when these fights actually occurred. So what point i proved is beyond me.
So let me get this straight, you feel that Jones was a greater fighter than Nunn at the time he beat Toney and Toney was a greater fighter than Barkley, Starling and Kalambay even though the best win on his record was Sosa (while not bad, is not where near great) at the time he fought Nunn.
My point, which you helped proving with your posts is that Nunn was Toney's best win, just like Jones's best win was Toney.
If you put an asterisk because Toney was drained, you better put an asterisk because Nunn was a cokehead.
Comment
Comment