Roy Jones vs Chad Dawson at lhw

[SplitSecond]

Physical Attributes:
Power:?
Hand speed: Jones

Technical Attributes:
Combinations: Dawson
Jab: Dawson
Footwork:?
Defense:Jones
Offense: Dawson

Other:
Workrate: Dawson
Intangibles: Dawson
Boxing IQ: ?

Blue Print Fight:
Jones vs Tarver


Who wins and why?

wtf is the matter with you?

dawson has nothing over jones
power/footwork/IQ "?", seriously?

not to mention giving dawson a better offense, sweet jesus

[SNAKE GRIFFIN]

Physical Attributes:
Power:?
Hand speed: Jones

Technical Attributes:
Combinations: Dawson
Jab: Dawson
Footwork:?
Defense:Jones
Offense: Dawson

Other:
Workrate: Dawson
Intangibles: Dawson
Boxing IQ: ?

Blue Print Fight:
Jones vs Tarver


Who wins and why?

Physical Attributes: Dawson
Power: Even

Hand speed:Jones Jnr

Technical Attributes:
Combinations: Jones Jnr
Footwork:Jones Jnr
Defenseawson
Offense: Jones Jnr

Other:
Workrate: Dawson
Intangibles: Dawson
Boxing IQ: Dawson

Prime vs prime this is a great fight full of skill. if Dawson uses his size and slickness and has the bit between the teeth from the off i can't see Jnr winning.
Before you hate Jones Jnr never faced top class competition and fought in a weak division and was still beaten by Tarver and Johnson both who lost to Bad Chad.

[BigStereotype]

Physical Attributes: Dawson
Power: Even

Hand speed:Jones Jnr

Technical Attributes:
Combinations: Jones Jnr
Footwork:Jones Jnr
Defenseawson
Offense: Jones Jnr

Other:
Workrate: Dawson
Intangibles: Dawson
Boxing IQ: Dawson

Prime vs prime this is a great fight full of skill. if Dawson uses his size and slickness and has the bit between the teeth from the off i can't see Jnr winning.
Before you hate Jones Jnr never faced top class competition and fought in a weak division and was still beaten by Tarver and Johnson both who lost to Bad Chad.

1. Oh my God
2. You can say that Roy Jones didn't fight any top competition, until you actually watch his career. Then that sort of stops being applicable. Remember when he annihilated the p4p 1 James Toney? Yeah, me too.
3. Oh my God
4. Ever hear of a triangle theory? They're especially laughable when you use an old and rapidly declining fighter. EX: Trevor Berbick > Muhammad Ali > Sonny Liston

[Toney616]

wtf is the matter with you?

dawson has nothing over jones
power/footwork/IQ "?", seriously?

I didn't know what to put so I left it blank, so other posters here could give me their opinions.

[The_Demon]

Jones dominates him and stops him mid rounds,Dawson has never faced anybody athletically better than him and i feel he wouldnt know what too do with a prime roy,he followed Pascal around looking confused quite a lot,so i can only imagine it would be ten times worse for him against Rjj

[SplitSecond]

I didnt know what to put so I left it blank, so other posters here could give me their opinions.

it's not all attributes, just a simple style could be nightmare for another fighter even if the other fighter has the advantage in all the things you listed

but in this case, dawson doesn't stand much of a chance in terms of physicality or style and im a big bad chad fan

[Toney616]

I don't give dawson a single advantage over roy in your list.

Dawson has a better jab

intangibles?

The will to win. The ability to fight through adversity.

Dawson showed his when he fought Johnson in their first fight. Even though he didnt give a good account of himself with Pascal he was slowly starting to take over the fight rather than give up

Jones dug deep during the last rounds of the Tarver I fight, seemed to be content to finish during other tough fights like Johnson and Tarver III

Workrate?

At lhw Jones punch output is around 35-40 punches per round.

Dawson had a fight or two (glen johnson) where he worked hard

I'm talking about work rate (i.e avg punch output) and you are talking about a couple of hard fights?

[Toney616]

it's not all attributes, just a simple style could be nightmare for another fighter even if the other fighter has the advantage in all the things you listed

True. But how would you state that if you had to produce a list?
Style advantage: Jones?

but in this case, dawson doesn't stand much of a chance in terms of physicality or style and im a big bad chad fan

Do you think he can improve under manny?

[musiol]

Dawson has a better jab

The will to win. The ability to fight through adversity.

Dawson showed his when he fought Johnson in their first fight. Even though he didnt give a good account of himself with Pascal he was slowly starting to take over the fight rather than give up

Jones dug deep during the last rounds of the Tarver I fight, seemed to be content to finish during other tough fights like Johnson and Tarver III

At lhw Jones punch output is around 35-40 punches per round.

I'm talking about work rate (i.e avg punch output) and you are talking about a couple of hard fights?

when did a good jab bother jones you keep talking about tarver fights where he was shot. a thought this was prime for prime?

[Toney616]

your a muppet since when did a good jab bother jones

I don't remember saying it did. I'm just listings their attributes. I take it comprehension isn't your strong point

you keep talking about Tarver fights where he was shot

I listed the Tarver fights as a stylistic match-up. Jones vs a tall rangy southpaw. I never said he was prime during those fights

Also how the **** was he shot?

your a complete gay shut up!!a thought this was prime for prime you just stay quiet *****

You don't have the slightest clue what you are going on about. Intangibles have nothing to do with whether a fighter is in their prime or not. Example take Morales who was shot against Maidana or Toney vs Peters II

PS: stop being a blind fanboy