No love for ol' Ezzard. I have him at 5.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
would it be illogical to have willie pep P4P #1
Collapse
-
Originally posted by sonnyboyresume.. we are talking resume here or have you forgotten
Comment
-
Originally posted by sonnyboywe are talking resume here and wether you like it or not this is a statistical fact - Pep achieved the greatest peak won-loss record in history 134-1-1... Robinson, Langford, Grebb or Charles all fall short with their resumes when it comes against the above statistical fact.
Pep is a boxing immortal. His 134-1-1 record is great. But its fluff compared to who each man actually fought and beat in their careers and that is how resumes are judged first and foremost. There is no way around this for you because Langford simply beat better fighters during his career. You're always asking for links, well I've given them to you and in every one Langford rates higher and his competition rates higher. since they never fought h2h head these rankings are based on their respective resumes. You're shooting blanks Sonny, just give it up.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sonnyboyyou made a comment saying there are "Too many boxers with better resumes than Pep"... i replied "i cant think of many" based on his 134-1-1..
you then twist it around to insinuate that Langfords win-loss record is better even tho it is a statistical fact in boxing history that Pep holds the greatest peak win-loss record of all times of any boxer in the sports history, yet when that evidence is put infront of you you say just give it up your shooting blanks Sonny
If Pep has the better resume than why has Langford have more names on his ranked on every list? Can you provide a link showing Pep fought better fighters? Are you going to post your top 20 lists so we can debate where the fighters I mention earlier belong? You won't do any of these things because you can't, and that is a FACT!Last edited by JAB5239; 04-18-2011, 04:28 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sonnyboyi already posted up a list of the World champions who Willie Pep fought and you referred to them as "FLUFF" and you done that because you know absolutely nothing whatsoever about any of those champions who Pep fought, you have never seen any of them fight on film nor have you any idea of how good they was so you brush them off as FLUFF... why don't we just add Willie Pep to the Boxingscene History section garbage bin along with a long list of other ATGs like Tyson, Dempsey, Tunney, Marciano, Johnson & Joe Louis and talk about your own personal list of who you think are the real greats of the sport ie: Langford, Greb, Tommy Morrison, David Tua & Lennox Lewis.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sonnyboyi already posted up a list of the World champions who Willie Pep fought and you referred to them as "FLUFF" and you done that because you know absolutely nothing whatsoever about any of those champions who Pep fought, you have never seen any of them fight on film nor have you any idea of how good they was so you brush them off as FLUFF... why don't we just add Willie Pep to the Boxingscene History section garbage bin along with a long list of other ATGs like Tyson, Dempsey, Tunney, Marciano, Johnson & Joe Louis and talk about your own personal list of who you think are the real greats of the sport ie: Langford, Greb, Tommy Morrison, David Tua & Lennox Lewis.
More lying by poor sonny when he knows he can't hang with the facts and refuses to answer questions. Tsk, tsk, tsk!
I've never referred to the champions Pep fought as "fluff". You trying to blow his "peak" record up instead of comparing the actual fighters each fought is the fluff. You have once again been exposed as a liar and out of your league when trying to debate me on anything. shall we post a poll asking who had the better resume and ask what the fine posters in this section think?
Still waiting on you to answer those question.
Comment
Comment