Is Wlad Greater Than These Heavyweights?

[StarshipTrooper]

This is trolling a legitimate topic.

A legitimate topic hijacked by idiots and nuthuggers. Belongs in NSB where the idiots and nuthuggers belong.

Poet

[prinzemanspopa]

Wlad,at the moment,has a legitimate argument as a top ten ATG heavyweight.The other four are either fringe heavyweight greats or simply not greats at all.



So yes,Wlad is greater than all four.

This is trolling a legitimate topic.

And he has the nerve to call others "trolls".I'd argue that he's the single biggest troll in this entire section.


We all have our moments.Sometimes certain arguments can get out of hand and the odd expletive thrown in the other's direction,but he does this with anybody he disagree's with.



Four consecutive responses - all against the same user - who hadn't replied back.

[NChristo]

Four conecutive responses - all against the same user - who hadn't replied back.

He was replying, looks like he got rid of his posts though.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

No....just no.

[JAB5239]

Wlad,at the moment,has a legitimate argument as a top ten ATG heavyweight.

Really? What would this legitimate argument consist of? Being ko'd by 3 journeymen or fighting in the weakest era in history?

[Die Antwoord]

Really? What would this legitimate argument consist of? Being ko'd by 3 journeymen or fighting in the weakest era in history?

Corrie Sanders musta been the best journeyman of all time, having a record of 38-2 at the time. And losing a couple times before your prime makes you ineligible to be an atg? We can play that game. Schmeling was far more of a journeyman than Sanders. I mean he had already lost 7 times and had 3 draws and he had been KO 1'ed by a guy named Gipsey. And he KO'ed Louis. So Joe Louis cant be an ATG now. Because he lost to a guy like Schmeling. There are plenty of guys I am sure you consider an ATG that this type of logic can be applied to.

So you hate Calzaghe even though he never lost, but a guy who lost 3 times, once very young having fought 12 times in 12 months etc...in about 60 fights...oh he cant be an atg...

[JAB5239]

Corrie Sanders musta been the best journeyman of all time, having a record of 38-2 at the time.

Tell me all the top 10 fighters Sanders EVER beat besides wlad?

And losing a couple times before your prime makes you ineligible to be an atg? We can play that game. Schmeling was far more of a journeyman than Sanders. I mean he had already lost 7 times and had 3 draws and he had been KO 1'ed by a guy named Gipsey. And he KO'ed Louis. So Joe Louis cant be an ATG now. Because he lost to a guy like Schmeling. There are plenty of guys I am sure you consider an ATG that this type of logic can be applied to.

You're clearly not very bright and relying only on boxrec for your info. Try checking the overall quality of competition for both fighters and you will see the difference. You see fit to call schmeling a journeyman, yet he was beating top 10 fighters where as sanders never did. Never did. Never did before or after Wlad.

So you hate Calzaghe even though he never lost, but a guy who lost 3 times, once very young having fought 12 times in 12 months etc...in about 60 fights...oh he cant be an atg...

Like I said, you aren't very bright concerning this sport and its history. . Brush up on it for a few years and get back to me.

[GoogleMe]

Then you aren't thinking seriously. There's never been a weaker Heavyweight division than the current one.

Poet

So you say. But Wladimir has fought the best and beat the best out there. I think that Larry's resume is overrated, just as all the old fighters. Most sports evolve, so has boxing. Some of todays fighter are way overrated also, but most of the guys from today, would brutally school the old schools.

[JAB5239]

So you say. But Wladimir has fought the best and beat the best out there. I think that Larry's resume is overrated, just as all the old fighters. Most sports evolve, so has boxing. Some of todays fighter are way overrated also, but most of the guys from today, would brutally school the old schools.

The only thing todays heavyweight fighters have over past era's is size. They lack skills, stamina and experience on the overall compared to past fighters. You're a good guy Google and I'd be happy to debate this with you in a civil manner.

[Die Antwoord]

The only thing todays heavyweight fighters have over past era's is size. They lack skills, stamina and experience on the overall compared to past fighters. You're a good guy Google and I'd be happy to debate this with you in a civil manner.

Vitali Klitschko lacks stamina? Ok............................How many fights did Schmeling throw 1000 punches in?