Originally posted by mrboxer
View Post
1. trash
2. About power punchers
3. About total punching ability
I mean its clear the list is about power. Anyone with 1/10th of my IQ could tell that. If it was on anything other than power, Shavers wouldnt be in the top 10. But he cant face that, he's been proven wrong. He told me to go see how Ring ranks punchers in terms of power and how every knowledgeable person says shavers is the best, well Ring's most comprehensive article on it, and ESPN's most comprehensive article both dont list Shavers inthe top 5. Both articles this clown has argued against and has cited nothing. He is such a clown he tried to argue that a list entitled, "The hardest hitting heavyweights" wasnt about who was the hardest hitting.
Comment