Originally posted by MmuhammadM
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What would Prime Tyson vs Prime Tua be like?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by MmuhammadM View PostYes because that's how long it takes ******s like you to answer a question directly.
Originally posted by MmuhammadM View PostLoL, where did I did I involve religion in my responses to this thread?
Please show me the quote.
You're not just an idiot, you're a complete ******.Originally posted by frankenfrank View PostI didn't claim you posted anything about it here , my only reason was knowing you and your constant lack of reasoning that have any relation to boxing.
You have no reasoning but only (secret) agenda that has nothing to do with boxing. You will bump old threads about Muhammad Ali , like his legacy needs you to defend it , and like you can convince anyone about anything.
All you ever do is claim Muhamad Ali will beat anyone and you back it up by no reasons at all , I wonder if you have seen more than 20 fights over all.
You never write anything about how you think someone will win , you only say he would have won , and the only fighters you ever mention are either Ali , or
the ones that are related to him. In this case it is Tyson for some reason known only to you (or maybe not to you) , and again , you have no idea and no opinion and no scenario about how Tyson could have won against Tua , just as is the standard with you.Originally posted by MmuhammadM View Post"Sure he does , Tyson is a ****** after all and Allah will hand him the victory with ease.
In fact , the only reason to why Tyson lost to Danny Williams is because Williams is a more devote ****** than him." - I'm still waiting for the quote about religion that I allegedly made.
"Religion is your only motive in your posts , well , maybe race too.
No reasoning just an agenda."
Come on? where did I bring religion into this thread?Originally posted by frankenfrank View PostTry to use words you have a clue about their meaning .
The word allegedly is too heavy on you , try to learn what it means.
I explained why you post the spam you post , not to say you explicitly post about religion and race , you rather do it implicitly which means you are not a total idiot , just a moderate idiot who tries to use scum methods but you are too ****** to understand you can't convince anyone and let me explain the word convince to you : it means to change someone's opinion , you never manage to do it with anyone. You are just a dirty ****** man who is to ****** to understand he effects no one's mind , and you are even too ******ed to know or try to think why you think the way you do , you just post your **** and it makes you satisfied .Originally posted by MmuhammadM View Postwow..............talk about random blabbering. It means absolutely nothing to me.
How about you actually get to the point and answer my question about religion.Originally posted by frankenfrank View PostIf you read my posts and understood what you were reading you would not have kept repeating your same self justification which convinces only yourself.
just read what i wrote because if you didn't read or understand previously then you will keep failing in this and repeating myself so many times in the same thread is a waste of time and (virtual) space. and while it makes you satisfied it doesn't make me satisfied , so find someone else in the NSB , i believe you have some chance of finding someone as bored as you are there .Originally posted by MmuhammadM View Postmore blabbering.....................................
Please post something useful and actually answer my quetions, you ******ed ALT.Originally posted by frankenfrank View PostI answered them at least twice already , but some idiots don't understand they got an answer when they see one.
I didn't claim you mentioned race or religion , only that these are your motives .
Why do I think you have motives ? because you never displayed any reasoning .Originally posted by MmuhammadM View Post
Still waiting for the quote you ******ed ALT ................Originally posted by frankenfrank View PostNo such quote .Originally posted by MmuhammadM View PostFinally....................................WELL DONE (sarcasm)
BTW this is how long it takes for a ****** to answer a question directly...........Originally posted by frankenfrank View PostThis is how long it takes for a ****** to get his answer for the 5th time when he
finally gets it.
Or is your problem you do not know what to count ?
Comment
-
remark : i had to delete 2 of your smilies , I did it because it was the only way I could have quoted your hyper emoticoned text.
Comment
-
Originally posted by frankenfrank View Postremark : i had to delete 2 of your smilies , I did it because it was the only way I could have quoted your hyper emoticoned text.
"Religion is your only motive in your posts , well , maybe race too.
No reasoning just an agenda."
Your "Implicit"/"explicit" bull**** doesn't quite cut it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MmuhammadM View PostNo, doesn't prove your point at all. It's clear I didn't bring religion into this thread PERIOD, but your post still denies it:
"Religion is your only motive in your posts , well , maybe race too.
No reasoning just an agenda."
Your "Implicit"/"explicit" bull**** doesn't quite cut it.
For those who don't , it doesn't.
But at least you managed to answer yourself this time .
Comment
-
-
Mike tyson blasts tua in 1rd are you crazy tua has never
in his life been on that level the only person he fought
was lewis would not supprise me if monte ko's em
he is a little fat boy
Comment
-
Originally posted by frankenfrank View PostFleeing is the best way of surviving Tua , no doubt , but it leads to losing on the scorecards , and Tyson would not have become a Chris Byrd had he fought Tua.
And also , using hyperactive movement may get a fighter tire lately and then get brutally stopped , especially if this movement involves some offensive moves
, which is more likely what you meant.
The only professional fighter who can claim he won against Tua is Lewis , whom did not use too much movement , he simply kept his range and exploited his huge punching range (and chin location) advantage.
Comment
-
If I could pick 6 guys to fight Tyson prime for prime, they'd be Foreman, Liston, Ibeabuchi, Tua, Holmes and Ali. The middle two mainly for the entertainment value, the outer 4 having the best chance of beating Mike.
Tyson has just about every advantage against Tua, except maybe chin and power is pretty close. But I think it would be extremely entertaining and Mike would have to fight the right fight to beat him.
Comment
Comment