Joe Frazier ducked who?

[StarshipTrooper]

Another post where you ignore what is said and resort to cursing and doing the old "I know you are, but what am I?".

Why don't you go log off for half a day and then come back when you thought of a semi-good response, like you were doing in the beginning of our debate.

Except that we've already established that A) you argue in circles, B) you set up strawmen, C) you change the premise of the debate, and D) don't know what the **** you're talking about. So, why don't you log off for about 10 years and come back once you've actually learned something about the sport AND lost your prepubecent hero worship: Nuthugging is an unbecoming trait and ignorance even less attractive :yadayadayada9:

Poet

[smallbutstrong]

Except that we've already established that A) you argue in circles, B) you set up strawmen, C) you change the premise of the debate, and D) don't know what the **** you're talking about. So, why don't you log off for about 10 years and come back once you've actually learned something about the sport AND lost your prepubecent hero worship: Nuthugging is an unbecoming trait and ignorance even less attractive :yadayadayada9:

Poet

Argue in circles? In every single one of your posts, you talked about how bad the 80s heavyweights were and didn't give enough of an argument as to why it was so bad. You would just say one statement and then leave it at that. No argument with your opinion.

You would also talk about how fat Tubbs was and even admitting that he was fatter than Galento. I showed you a picture comparison of the two and you said it wasn't good enough. I then asked you to find some pictures that you liked and do a comparison for yourself, but you refused and just said "I don't need to. I saw Tubbs for myself in the 80s".

When things aren't going your way, what do you do? You curse at your opposition and put some ****** smilies.

Sorry to break your heart, but debates aren't won like that.

[StarshipTrooper]

Argue in circles? In every single one of your posts, you talked about how bad the 80s heavyweights were and didn't give enough of an argument as to why it was so bad. You would just say one statement and then leave it at that. No argument with your opinion.

Actually I did but you chose to ignore it. Typical high school debater: Don't like the facts, pretend they don't exist.

You would also talk about how fat Tubbs was and even admitting that he was fatter than Galento. I showed you a picture comparison of the two and you said it wasn't good enough. I then asked you to find some pictures that you liked and do a comparison for yourself, but you refused and just said "I don't need to. I saw Tubbs for myself in the 80s".

As I pointed, you post the best photo of Tubbs you could find and the worst of Galento you could find. BTW, Google images doesn't have squat on Tubbs besides promo shots that show him in the best possible light. Anyone who actually watched his fight with Tyson knows I'm dead on about Mr. Jiggles.


[QUOTE=smallbutstrong;8550522]When things aren't going your way, what do you do? You curse at your opposition and put some ****** smilies.

No, when people are hell bent on being idiots I stop bothering to waste my time trying to educate them and start laughing at their ******ed asses :hahahaha9:

Sorry to break your heart, but debates aren't won like that.

See my previous post for the sophmoric tactics that you use that don't win debates (except in high school which this ain't)

Poet

[smallbutstrong]

Actually I did but you chose to ignore it. Typical high school debater: Don't like the facts, pretend they don't exist.

Insult #1.

As I pointed, you post the best photo of Tubbs you could find and the worst of Galento you could find. BTW, Google images doesn't have squat on Tubbs besides promo shots that show him in the best possible light. Anyone who actually watched his fight with Tyson knows I'm dead on about Mr. Jiggles.

Insult #2.

No, when people are hell bent on being idiots I stop bothering to waste my time trying to educate them and start laughing at their ******ed asses :hahahaha9:

Insults #3 and #4.

See my previous post for the sophmoric tactics that you use that don't win debates (except in high school which this ain't)

Poet

Speaking of high school, when are you graduating?

[StarshipTrooper]

Insult #1.

Wrong! That was Accurate Statement #1.

Insult #2.?

Wrong! That was Accurate Statement #2.

Insults #3 and #4.

Window licking ******s like yourself get accurately labled.

Speaking of high school, when are you graduating?

Sorry Junior: Got my batchelor's degree 18 years ago :cool9:

Poet

[smallbutstrong]

Wrong! That was Accurate Statement #1.

Wrong! That was Accurate Statement #2.

Just like that, you do the same old "I know you are but what I am?" again.

Window licking ******s like yourself get accurately labled.

Feels good being a tough guy behind a computer, doesn't it?

Sorry Junior: Got my batchelor's degree 18 years ago :cool9:

Poet

I'm sure they did a wonderful job teaching you.

I'm outta' here. Be sure to let me know when you grow a pair and actually feel like debating and not flaming.

[StarshipTrooper]

[QUOTE=smallbutstrong;8550787]Just like that, you do the same old "I know you are but what I am?" again.

Nice try but FAIL :cool9:

Feels good being a tough guy behind a computer, doesn't it?

I feel great! :bringit9:

I'm sure they did a wonderful job teaching you.

Sophmoric tactic #1,023: Point out the typo because you've got nothing else :geek9:

I'm outta' here. Be sure to let me know when you grow a pair and actually feel like debating and not flaming.

And that's tap-out #2 :grin9:

Poet

[JAB5239]

lmao.you said it yourself.are you saying i did something to that quote of yours?

Where did I ever say ANYTHING about "regardless of circumstance"? Post a link or you're a liar and thats all there is to it. Pretty amusing how you don't want to address the other lies you claim I said in which I pointed out how you're making up tall tales to save face. You, ****** and to a lesser extent Roses have all gotten smoked by the facts. You can lie and twist words all you want but you have no answers for the timeline and I've proven you're trying to single out Frazier when in the history of boxing almost every champion has missed fights some think should have been made. It's always amusing for me to smack you guys around for a bit. Thanks for the laughs joker!

[JAB5239]

This is the typical post from someone who is unable to debate.

Than in your opinion, did Frazier "duck" Lyle?

[JAB5239]

So what? Did Chuck Wepner,Ron Lyle and Joe Bugner even slightly resemble Frazier in style?


Frazier didn't need someone similar to Ali for a tune up the previous two times he fought him either.

Funny how you can make these assumptions but have never stepped foot in a boxing ring. You know more than Eddie Futch and exactly what his thinking and strategy was, right? What Ali's strategy was and how often and who he fought has nothing to do with Frazier. Continue on with you diatribe though, nothing can change the fact that Joe is and will always be remebered as great.

Ron Lyle,Ken Norton,Earnie Shavers,Muhammad Ali 2x,Joe Frazier 2x,Floyd Patterson 2x,Eddie Machen,Thad Spencer,Jimmy Ellis,Mac Foster,George Chuvalo.



Quarry fought more top opposition than Frazier did.

Ali 3x, Foreman 2x, Quarry 2x, Bugner, Foster, Ellis 2x, Bonevena 2x, Mathis, Jones, Ramos, Chuvalo.

Not only this, but h2h and better wins has to be taken into consideration. You lose again.

Im done abusing you guys. Think what you want, it will never change the facts.