No Joe Louis, Rocky Marciano, Sugar Ray Robinson, Archie Moore. Bob Foster whipped every LH he ever faced, and you have Toney, Spinks, and Hoja on your list ahead of him??? Make a New list!!!!!!!!!!!!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Greatest 40 fighters of the last 40 years?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by gibo View PostNo Joe Louis, Rocky Marciano, Sugar Ray Robinson, Archie Moore. Bob Foster whipped every LH he ever faced, and you have Toney, Spinks, and Hoja on your list ahead of him??? Make a New list!!!!!!!!!!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by gibo View PostNo Joe Louis, Rocky Marciano, Sugar Ray Robinson, Archie Moore. Bob Foster whipped every LH he ever faced, and you have Toney, Spinks, and Hoja on your list ahead of him??? Make a New list!!!!!!!!!!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by bklynboy View PostHmmm. Maybe my attempt at humor did not go over well. I have nothing against Hatton but I don't rate him highly at all.
As with the quote:
I don't see Hatton remembered by anyone who wasn't actively following him while he was active
Mainly due to the fact that he fought the two best fighters of the last ten years in memorable fights,they may have been losing efforts but the knockouts he suffered will be hard to forgetLast edited by The_Demon; 04-22-2010, 08:13 AM.
Comment
-
IMO Roy Jones is way too high on the list. I don't belive his accomplishments surpass Pac and SRL, and I'm not sure that Pac has surpassed SRL YET.
Comment
-
Originally posted by british_fan View PostWhile i have no issue with you not rating hatton too highly i do disagree with the bolded statement-I think hatton will be very well remembered
Mainly due to the fact that he fought the two best fighters of the last ten years in memorable fights,they may have been losing efforts but the knockouts he suffered will be hard to forget
Now, by "anybody" I'm not talking about diehard boxing history fans who would be interested in watching the "old-timers" from the 1990s and 2000. They, at least, will have better film than we have of the fighters from the 194os.
The die hard fans would probably have DVDs (or whatever they will have) called the 100 best fights of the 1990s and the 100 best fights of the 2000. Those fans will know Ricky Hatton.
But, truly, outside of die hard boxing history fans how many boxing fans know more than 3 or 4 boxers from every decade. And even then it's limited.
Example: the 1960s. Who's remembered? Liston, Ali, Frazier, Griffith anybody else?
The boxing history fans would go: how can you forget Fighting Harada or Benny Kid Paret or Gene Fullmer or **** Tiger or ...
Hatton will probably be remembered in much the same way as Paret is -- for his loss to Griffith.
Again no disrespect to Hatton. He was a good fighter (good enough to get a belt -- and that's damn good) and he's a likeable man.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by gibo View PostThe Polish Tiger was a tough dude. But I'd have to go with Foster! It'd be a good exciting fight for sure.
You also have to remember that Dariusz went up to CW and won a title by KO, then moved back down to LH and made multiple KO defenses against the likes of Virgil Hill, a very good boxer with a sound chin who'd held the WBA strap for many years, where as Foster was KO'd by most quality fighters at 185 and over..
If Foster couldn't KO Ray Anderson and Pierre Fouri at 175, then no way is he gonna KO Michalczewski either.. I'd say Bob's chances are slim to none..
Comment
-
Originally posted by mickey malone View PostFoster never faced anyone half as tough as him at 175.. He also never faced a fellow puncher at 175.. Michalczewski also had an iron jaw and could KO with both hands, so i'd say the only way Foster can win this, is on the back foot which wasn't his strongest asset..
You also have to remember that Dariusz went up to CW and won a title by KO, then moved back down to LH and made multiple KO defenses against the likes of Virgil Hill, a very good boxer with a sound chin who'd held the WBA strap for many years, where as Foster was KO'd by most quality fighters at 185 and over..
If Foster couldn't KO Ray Anderson and Pierre Fouri at 175, then no way is he gonna KO Michalczewski either.. I'd say Bob's chances are slim to none..
Comment
Comment