Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Should Hearns and Pacquiao both have been Disqualified?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by donkim View Post
    "But a poll up"? This is far too much of a recurring theme to simply be a mistype.

    Stop being such a moron and take your head out of your rectum.


    Nobody cares about credibility on the internet but sad losers such as yourself.Nobody even knows who you are.


    This is a ****** thread from a ****** poster who want's the acceptance of the internet bully boy posters.
    You can't have it both ways. You can't openly accuse someone in an open forum of being a worthless poster and not have any credibilty when 80% think you are the one who should leave. Everyone is entitled to their opinion and if you hate me that much why would you simply ignore me instead of calling me silly c*nt and throwing red at me? The poll was a way to give your argument "Worthless poster" some credibility. Unfortunately, it seems that alot of the community here dosen't think too highly of your negativity and trolling. You love to throw the word loser alot it seems some self projection. Name calling is childish in a forum but sure enough man to man, mano to mano, Donna Kim wouldn't do these things face to face.

    Donna Kim is the classic cyber bully. Nothing else going on their life. Mrs Kim realizes that if he would translate his machismo in real life physical engagement his life would be terminated with extreme prejudice. Mrs Kim upon information and belief, due to viewing fights as Mancini vs Kim, Griffith vs Paret, Baer vs Campbell, and Robinson vs Doyle realizes that is better to sit in front of a PC to insult others instead of being a true man and doing it by face. Those were true warriors who unfortunately died in combat-something Mrs. Kim would never do.

    How does it feel that 80% of the posters here what you to leave? Yet of course you will keep trolling.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by HaglerSteelChin View Post
      realizes that is better to sit in front of a PC to insult others instead of being a true man and doing it by face. Those were true warriors who unfortunately died in combat-something Mrs. Kim would never do.

      How does it feel that 80% of the posters here what you to leave? Yet of course you will keep trolling.

      You actually started an irrelevant thread in which you tried to gain the support of others because you yourself are an insecure little girl.The thread also has absolutely nothing to do with boxing

      Doing it by face? You really an idiot.You don't insult others for no reason in real life,moron,unless it is done in light humor.This is the internet and unfortunately it attracts losers such as yourself who go crying to their mommy over some nasty guy on the internet.


      You accuse others of being a cyber bully and yet you start mumbling on about a few fights in which one man lost their life,in which isn't relevant what so ever.You're the one acting like an internet tough guy,laddy.

      Asking somebody who mocks you over the internet to do so in real life? Get a grip,lad.


      People know what the internet is,and most take what others say over the internet with a grain of salt.It's users like you who think that the internet is real lie and something to get personally offended over.


      Get that sand out of your vagina and take your head out of your rectum.

      Comment


      • #13
        How about disqualifying anyone who:
        1. Hugs without being knocked down;
        2. Throws punches in return after being hit;
        3. Reacts facially when hit with a hard punch?

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Method Checker View Post
          I don't agree with disqualifying someone for excessive holding. The maximum penalty should be deducting a point.
          Henry Akinwande was DQ'd for holding against Lennox Lewis by Mills Lane. And he deserved it.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by HaglerSteelChin View Post
            I know its very rare for a DQ on a title fight but should have Hearns been disqualified against Kinchen and Pacquiao against Hussein? In RD 4 for those two fights both Hearns and Pacquiao were both KD and immediately held on for dear life.

            Hearns was on ***** street and kept holding despite the referee Mills lane trying to seperate him. He refused to let go and was eventually deducted one point. But it was very intentional and he did it several times in RD4. I thought a bigger case could have been made for his DQ than Jones Jr in that infamous Montell Griffith fight. People think Hearns was robbed in the second SRL fight with the draw but few talk about the Kinchen fight. I scored the second SRL fight 113-112 for SRL. I thought SRL had atleast one 10-8 RD in RD 5 and maybe even RD12 could have been 10-8. But that fight is another story.

            Pacquaio faced Nedal Hussein an austrailian fighter of arab descent trained by Jeff Fenech. In RD 4, Hussein dropped pac with a stiff jab that got pac for suprise. The fight took place in the philippines and was officiated
            by Carlos Padilla a pinoy ref. After the KD, padila had a slow count and than Hussein immediately went for the kill but Pac gave him a bear hug and wouldnt let go. Hussein getting tired of Pac not breaking than elbowed him and Padilla than finally got him off and took a point away, LOL. Should pac have been DQ?


            It seems only where there is a challenger who is cleary losing ala Tyson vs Fergusen will a ref give a DQ for excessive holding.
            I have heard some people say that Hearns could have been DQ'd but I didn't see the fight.

            Comment

            Working...
            X
            TOP