RJ or BHop? I'd go with RJ. Hopkins may have had many ko's in his early career, but it was mostly against smaller guys who were natural mws, unlike him. Roy on the other hand knocked out natural lhws.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who punched harder in their prime?
Collapse
-
-
so he was too big to be a MW, but not weight drained either?
wow, you country red necks crack me up.
He schooled Pavlik, live with it
Comment
-
-
I don't understand why would you compare both. It's obvious that Roy hit harder, he was a hell of a puncher.
Bernard Hopkins was never known to have mad power. In his prime he was a great boxer with good/average punching ability. His skills made him KO his opponent.
It's like comparing Mayweather's to Cotto's punching power at WW.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Cotto-Rulez View PostI don't understand why would you compare both. It's obvious that Roy hit harder, he was a hell of a puncher.
Bernard Hopkins was never known to have mad power. In his prime he was a great boxer with good/average punching ability. His skills made him KO his opponent.
It's like comparing Mayweather's to Cotto's punching power at WW.
Comment
Comment