As you've so abundantly demonstrated in this thread, that's the category YOU fall into. You're getting your ass handed to you in this thread and you're too stu pid to realize it.
If trying to explain an abstract concept to people who are too dumb to process abstract thought is getting my ass handed to me, then yes.
Otherwise, stick to watching watching Taylor Swift videos, retard.
As I've already stated, a lineage starts with the first recognized champion. It doesnt need a magazine to claim it, it just is. Two come after one and three after two, right? That is a lineage of numbers. Same thing with boxing champions. It's sequential and it's prudent. My question still remains from several posts ago. You claimed The Ring got rid Lineal in the 90's because it wasnt viable in the 3 belt era. So why bring it back now in an era with even more orgs?
Maybe this will help you get your head around what I'm saying about John L and the lineal title ...Genesis is the first book of The Bible. But when Genesis was written, The Bible didn't exist. Now do you get it?
"You claimed The Ring got rid Lineal in the 90's because it wasnt viable in the 3 belt era. So why bring it back now in an era with even more orgs?"
Maybe this will help you get your head around what I'm saying about John L and the lineal title ...Genesis is the first book of The Bible. But when Genesis was written, The Bible didn't exist. Now do you get it?
"You claimed The Ring got rid Lineal in the 90's because it wasnt viable in the 3 belt era. So why bring it back now in an era with even more orgs?"
Good question!
You're comparing this to a book that wrote about some guy living in a whales mouth for months?
You are either as dumb as a rock or pretending to be as dumb as a rock to avoid admitting that you are wrong.
Lmao!!!! So you are saying there is not a succession of fighters ( lineal) of the man who beat the man going all the way back to Sullivan? And I'm dumb?
And you STILL haven't answered my question. If lineal wasn't viable and that's the reason YOU claim they got rid of it in the 90's than why bring it back in an era with more orgs and cartoon titles?
Lmao!!!! So you are saying there is not a succession of fighters ( lineal) of the man who beat the man going all the way back to Sullivan? And I'm dumb?
And you STILL haven't answered my question. If lineal wasn't viable and that's the reason YOU claim they got rid of it in the 90's than why bring it back in an era with more orgs and cartoon titles?
So you weren't pretending to be dumb. You really don't understand how analogies work.
Ok, I'll try to keep this simple for you. Yes, Sullivan is recorded as the first lineal HW champ. But that record was drawn up AFTER Sullivan's death. He was "awarded" the lineal title posthumously by Ring Magazine. He couldn't have fought for any lineal title, because the concept of lineal titles didn't exist during his lifetime. It was invented by the Ring in the 1920s.
Ring Magazine haven't brought back the lineal title. The Ring title is now awarded based on ratings, not lineages.
So you weren't pretending to be dumb. You really don't understand how analogies work.
Ok, I'll try to keep this simple for you. Yes, Sullivan is recorded as the first lineal HW champ. But that record was drawn up AFTER Sullivan's death. He was "awarded" the lineal title posthumously by Ring Magazine. He couldn't have fought for any lineal title, because the concept of lineal titles didn't exist during his lifetime. It was invented by the Ring in the 1920s.
Ring Magazine haven't brought back the lineal title. The Ring title is now awarded based on ratings, not lineages.
Ring magazine was around when Sullivan won the title. Nothing changes he was first and nothing changes the succession. Ring is based on ratings and not lineage? If Usyk loses, does not the next guy become the (lineal) champion? The Ring has nothing to do with lineal other than they have recognized it. Lineal is an entity of itself. It can't be changed.
Comment