The Best Between 180lbs & 190lbs?

[JAB5239]

Right, yes. In regards to moronic stance on Beterbiev and how you've deemed his take sensible despite the fact it directly contradicts you're stance.

What aren't you getting there?

Nothing to do with what was said about Quarry.

Lmao.......God you are slow. Everything he said about Quarry contradicts your opinion that Beterbiev was far more skilled, which now brings us full circle on what you started crying about to begin with.....my opinion Quarry was the more skilled fighter. Do you remember this now? I back it up with facts the Bill also stated such as Quarry had better head movement, slipped and carried punches. Had a better ability to throw combinations upstairs and downstairs, and proved it against better competition. Beterbiev is a good fighter, fun to watch, but he either can't or doesn't the skills Quarry did.....ie Quarry having a full toolbox as Bill put it. Geez, it's like you're arguing just to argue and miss the point of everything else.

[IronDanHamza]

Lmao.......God you are slow. Everything he said about Quarry contradicts your opinion that Beterbiev was far more skilled, which now brings us full circle on what you started crying about to begin with.....my opinion Quarry was the more skilled fighter. Do you remember this now? I back it up with facts the Bill also stated such as Quarry had better head movement, slipped and carried punches. Had a better ability to throw combinations upstairs and downstairs, and proved it against better competition. Beterbiev is a good fighter, fun to watch, but he either can't or doesn't the skills Quarry did.....ie Quarry having a full toolbox as Bill put it. Geez, it's like you're arguing just to argue and miss the point of everything else.

Right but I DON'T CARE what he said about Quarry. He has his opinion on Quarry and he's entitled to it. I didn't reply to him, did I, you idiot?

You're the one who did reply, saying his post "makes sense" when it totally contradicts your brain dead observation in regards to Beterbiev. So how does that work?

What part of that are you not understanding?

[JAB5239]

Right but I DON'T CARE what he said about Quarry. He has his opinion on Quarry and he's entitled to it. I didn't reply to him, did I, you idiot?

You're the one who did reply, saying his post "makes sense" when it totally contradicts your brain dead observation in regards to Beterbiev. So how does that work?

What part of that are you not understanding?

Ahhh i get it!! You only want to look at one part and say it contradicts me, but not the other part that DIRECTLY contradicts you!!! What a brilliant tactic there dannyboy!

I already explained what I said about Artur was a generalization but you want to keep harping on it like the little crybaby you are. I got nothing against Beterbiev and have no problem complimenting someone even if it goes totally against what i think. I appreciate the way he sees things. You? You're an idiot.

[IronDanHamza]

Ahhh i get it!! You only want to look at one part and say it contradicts me, but not the other part that DIRECTLY contradicts you!!! What a brilliant tactic there dannyboy!

Er yeah because YOU are the one who said it made sense

If I'd said it then yeah, I'd be calling a post that directly contradicts my position sensible.

But I didn't, you did. Hence why I replied directly to that. I didn't state my opinion on Bill's post so his stance on Quarry is irrelevant to the point.

I don't understand your difficulty with this stuff. It's been the same way for decades in these type of discussions.

I already explained what I said about Artur was a generalization but you want to keep harping on it like the little crybaby you are. I got nothing against Beterbiev and have no problem complimenting someone even if it goes totally against what i think. I appreciate the way he sees things. You? You're an idiot.

Well no you didn't "explain" anything. You just said it. I don't think you know a lot of the words you use mean.

And yes as previously stated, no shit you "generalized". I don't think anyone would disagree with that who has watched Beterbiev fight outside of highlights.

It's not only a "generalization", it's a moronic, frankly incorrect take. You'd be better off just conceding that instead of tapdancing around it.

[JAB5239]

Er yeah because YOU are the one who said it made sense

If I'd said it then yeah, I'd be calling a post that directly contradicts my position sensible.

But I didn't, you did. Hence why I replied directly to that. I didn't state my opinion on Bill's post so his stance on Quarry is irrelevant to the point.

I don't understand your difficulty with this stuff. It's been the same way for decades in these type of discussions.




Well no you didn't "explain" anything. You just said it. I don't think you know a lot of the words you use mean.

And yes as previously stated, no shit you "generalized". I don't think anyone would disagree with that who has watched Beterbiev fight outside of highlights.

It's not only a "generalization", it's a moronic, frankly incorrect take. You'd be better off just conceding that instead of tapdancing around it.

Lmao....you're a clown. Yes I said it, described it and posted video. You've shown nothing. Your only argument if "Beterbiev is way more skilled than Quarry". Where? At what? I've explained why Quarry was more skilled. Billeau also pointed out Quarrys bigger bag of tools. You can't see it because you dksab.Does it make Artur a bad fighter? He'll no. But that doesn't change that he wasn't as skilled as Quarry.

[IronDanHamza]

Lmao....you're a clown. Yes I said it, described it and posted video. You've shown nothing. Your only argument if "Beterbiev is way more skilled than Quarry". Where? At what? I've explained why Quarry was more skilled. Billeau also pointed out Quarrys bigger bag of tools. You can't see it because you dksab.Does it make Artur a bad fighter? He'll no. But that doesn't change that he wasn't as skilled as Quarry.

Well firstly the discussion wasn't about who was more skilled, it was about who was more complete.

You literally have not explained how you made that generalization in regards to Beterbeiv at all. You've just made the statement twice, you haven't elaborated on it at all. I do find your view on things very wild. You often think you've provided some kind of evidence or breakdown and have done nothing of the sort. You demand evidence from others whilst thinking you can provide "common sense" as a means of evidence when you make baseless claims. It's humorous, but I'd say more sad.

It's positive that you are (slowly) backtracking on that batshit take though.

I'm sure you are convinced that you have provided any analysis of any kind It's adorable you think posting a full length video and saying "watch it" is a description. It's fine though you can live in your fantasy world where Jerry Quarry is a better fighter than Beterbiev. Pretty sure you'll be in seldom company with that one much like you were by laughably claiming he "comes straight forward with power". Well, no actually that one is too dumb to even be considered.

[JAB5239]

Well firstly the discussion wasn't about who was more skilled, it was about who was more complete.

You literally have not explained how you made that generalization in regards to Beterbeiv at all. You've just made the statement twice, you haven't elaborated on it at all. I do find your view on things very wild. You often think you've provided some kind of evidence or breakdown and have done nothing of the sort. You demand evidence from others whilst thinking you can provide "common sense" as a means of evidence when you make baseless claims. It's humorous, but I'd say more sad.

It's positive that you are (slowly) backtracking on that batshit take though.

I'm sure you are convinced that you have provided any analysis of any kind It's adorable you think posting a full length video and saying "watch it" is a description. It's fine though you can live in your fantasy world where Jerry Quarry is a better fighter than Beterbiev. Pretty sure you'll be in seldom company with that one much like you were by laughably claiming he "comes straight forward with power". Well, no actually that one is too dumb to even be considered.

More skilled = more complete.

[IronDanHamza]

More skilled = more complete.

Really?

Is that always the case, is it? Is the more complete fighter always the more skilled fighter?

[JeBron Lamez]

Really?

Is that always the case, is it? Is the more complete fighter always the more skilled fighter?

I dunno, let's ask Rocky Marciano.

[IronDanHamza]

I dunno, let's ask Rocky Marciano.

That was a great reply.