The fact is he agreed to the demand and the fight didn't get made.
No, the fact is the fight didn't get made on the first negotiation because he refused the demand. That's not debatable, that's objective fact.
Then when the negotiations were revisited months later, he then accepted the same demand, after it was made clear months prior that it was off the table. So he "accepted" it, with the prior knowledge knowing that it wasn't on the table, which was public information.
Hate to sound like a parrot, and I know you have the IQ of a spoon, but that doesn't strengthen your argument it actually weakens it.
Right...but he made a very reasonable offer that was rejected. We pretty much just agreed with that. If Pacquaio finds it agreeable like the rest of us have, we would have had the fight in their primes.
Well that's a pro Mayweather train of thought. That Pacquiao should just cave in to all the demands but 2009 Mayweather wasn't in a position to manipulate the a side politics that Manny Pacquaio lost some bargaining power years later.
Right...but he made a very reasonable offer that was rejected.
You don't get it. It must not have been reasonable enough if he moved the goal posts.
If I go to the car dealer, and the salesman wants to sell me a car for 15,000 and i want it at 14, I walk away. I come back the next day and say ok 15, wtf he gonna do say now the car is 17.
You don't get it. It must not have been reasonable enough if he moved the goal posts.
If I go to the car dealer, and the salesman wants to sell me a car for 15,000 and i want it at 14, I walk away. I come back the next day and say ok 15, wtf he gonna do say now the car is 17.
The logic is skewed.
That has got to be, the absolute dumbest example I have ever seen I know you thought that made sense in your pea brained head too
It's more like you going into a car dealership, and the car being on sale for 20k (no cut off date), you offer 15 (24 day cut off date), the dealer counter offers and says I will do it for 17 (14 day cut off date) today but if you reject it then the offer no longer stands and it goes back to 20k (no cut off date ), for you to reject that 17 (14 day cut off date), to then return two months later and say I now accept your offer of 17 (14 day cut off) despite the fact it was made abundantly clear to you that it was off the table.
Comment