Sort of a matter of unloading the question really.
Is Holyfield a better HW than Tyson, in my view no, not prime for prime.
Tyson always struck me as a fighter with a great plan A and no plan B to fall back on whereas Holyfield I think could dig in and claw a result out better.
Think Holyfield had more ring smarts than Tyson.
So I guess to sum up I think Holy had a broader range of skills than Tyson so if that makes him more acomplished then yes.
Is Holyfield a better HW than Tyson, in my view no, not prime for prime.
Tyson always struck me as a fighter with a great plan A and no plan B to fall back on whereas Holyfield I think could dig in and claw a result out better.
Think Holyfield had more ring smarts than Tyson.
So I guess to sum up I think Holy had a broader range of skills than Tyson so if that makes him more acomplished then yes.
Comment