Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If Wills Had Fought And Beaten Dempsey In1922?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by travestyny View Post

    NY commissioner said politics killing the fight was hogwash. Pretty sure he knows more than anyone still living and most of the dead on the topic.
    - -Pols killed Red Sox Stadium first year, new Yankee Stadium the next, ie Boston and then NYNY.

    100% I know more than you.

    Why Harry no fight Gene in the eliminator Tex arrange for Hollywood Jack comeback?

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post

      - -Pols killed Red Sox Stadium first year, new Yankee Stadium the next, ie Boston and then NYNY.

      100% I know more than you.

      Why Harry no fight Gene in the eliminator Tex arrange for Hollywood Jack comeback?
      Proof? Let's see what you know.

      What killed the fight in Montreal? What about the broken contract? Why not in NY when the commission was with it?

      I don't think you know anything, honestly. I think you are just lonely so you enjoy embarrassing yourself as long as someone talks to you.

      Gene didn't want to fight Harry any more than Harry wanted to fight Gene. Harry was waiting for his shot and Gene was trying to jump the line.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by travestyny View Post

        Proof? Let's see what you know.

        What killed the fight in Montreal? What about the broken contract? Why not in NY when the commission was with it?

        I don't think you know anything, honestly. I think you are just lonely so you enjoy embarrassing yourself as long as someone talks to you.

        Gene didn't want to fight Harry any more than Harry wanted to fight Gene. Harry was waiting for his shot and Gene was trying to jump the line.
        - - Blah, blah after the fact.

        Already been explained Kearns bank liens and lack capital backing.

        1922 they coulda/woulda fought but for state politics. Everything after just a Shyte fest you play in.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post

          - - Blah, blah after the fact.

          Already been explained Kearns bank liens and lack capital backing.

          1922 they coulda/woulda fought but for state politics. Everything after just a Shyte fest you play in.
          Just the usual bombastic hot air from you . No sources, no substance,no information ,and definitely,no brains.

          It's amazing how you never get tired of spouting sewage day after day.
          Shyte fest is right,and you are sitting right in the middle of it!
          travestyny travestyny likes this.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by Ivich View Post

            Just the usual bombastic hot air from you . No sources, no substance,no information ,and definitely,no brains.

            It's amazing how you never get tired of spouting sewage day after day.
            Shyte fest is right,and you are sitting right in the middle of it!
            - - Links galore in the history section support me.

            If U weren’t so lazy is the story of U miserable like…

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post

              - - Links galore in the history section support me.

              If U weren’t so lazy is the story of U miserable like…
              That shyte is up to your neck now,better send for Mommy!

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post

                - - Blah, blah after the fact.

                Already been explained Kearns bank liens and lack capital backing.

                1922 they coulda/woulda fought but for state politics. Everything after just a Shyte fest you play in.
                That's not what happened with the Montreal proposal.

                Since you know so much, how about you explain what happened there with some sources to back up your stance.

                Here is your chance to show what you know. But I'm sure no one here is expecting much from you. Whenever you are ready, though!

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by travestyny View Post

                  That's not what happened with the Montreal proposal.

                  Since you know so much, how about you explain what happened there with some sources to back up your stance.

                  Here is your chance to show what you know. But I'm sure no one here is expecting much from you. Whenever you are ready, though!
                  - - Up to your eminence to lay out your Montreal proposal.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post

                    - - Up to your eminence to lay out your Montreal proposal.
                    Well you said you know more than I do so I'm asking what you know about the Montreal proposal for the Dempsey/ Wills fight. Anything?

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by travestyny View Post

                      Well you said you know more than I do so I'm asking what you know about the Montreal proposal for the Dempsey/ Wills fight. Anything?
                      - - Welcome to show the above/\

                      Never heard of it before.

                      JJohnson supposedly lined up a Dempsey challenge in Mexico City rightly seen as a figment then, but they eventually fought in the dead of winter in Canada, or so it was said.

                      Go git’em Tiger!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP