Interesting how Joe Calzaghes legacy has changed

[Chollo Vista]

Calzaghe wasn’t in his prime either when he fought Hopkins and Jones. Hopkins was able to fight into a later age because he got off to a late start and didn’t take much punishment during his career while padding his record at 160 against stiffs.

If Foreman and Lewis fight right now will you count that? Both are out of their primes, right

Out of prime fighter A vs Out of prime fighter B. It counts!

[Rockin']

Since you were in the corner, we all know your friend got whooped

A good corner will rarely win you a fight. It's about how the fighter trained or didn't train, I was called in last minute. But how could you ever know that, when the only corner that you have ever been in was with a dunce cap on..................Rockin'

[MikeyMike100]

So if the same guys beaten was raked 5th instead of 6th or 7th that would change your rotten opinion? Your nit picking and talking semantics. News flash 8 ring magazine opponents beat is a good amount. You should up the fighters at middle weight to heavyweight from 1990- current. Hint hint, there are not may who beat more and none of them were undefeated. Trust me.

Calzaghes resume is very overrated. Which makes Calzaghes abilities as a fighter very overrated

[QueensburyRules]

No, they didn’t.

You just made that up.

- - How many X they hold you back a grade before they kicked you out of school?

You don't have access to all the Ring data, duh, but the evidence show 1997 Eubank held a top 10 ranking as did Roy with Poppy being the Champ when they fought SuperJoe...

[IronDanHamza]

- - How many X they hold you back a grade before they kicked you out of school?

You don't have access to all the Ring data, duh, but the evidence show 1997 Eubank held a top 10 ranking as did Roy with Poppy being the Champ when they fought SuperJoe...

I had almost every Ring Magazine during that timeframe.

Roy Jones was not in the Top 5 and Eubank was not even ranked. These are literal facts.

And you LITERALLY just made that up that they were those things out of thin air.

You’re a joke. You need to hurry up and die to be honest.

[QueensburyRules]

I had almost every Ring Magazine during that timeframe.

Roy Jones was not in the Top 5 and Eubank was not even ranked. These are literal facts.

And you LITERALLY just made that up that they were those things out of thin air.

You’re a joke. You need to hurry up and die to be honest.

- - Then copy and post your relevant rankings if your hambone running through your thick noggin allows it...easy~peasy puddin'pie...

[IronDanHamza]

- - Then copy and post your relevant rankings if your hambone running through your thick noggin allows it...easy~peasy puddin'pie...

The onus and burden of proof is on you, you dumb cunt.

You’re making the claim that The Ring “changed” their rankings to which Roy Jones was in the Top 5 and Eubank was ranked.

Both of which are flat out lies.

[QueensburyRules]

The onus and burden of proof is on you, you dumb cunt.

You’re making the claim that The Ring “changed” their rankings to which Roy Jones was in the Top 5 and Eubank was ranked.

Both of which are flat out lies.

- - I posted irrefutable stat links.

U blew a hole in your shorts...

[IronDanHamza]

- - I posted irrefutable stat links.

U blew a hole in your shorts...

Well erm no you didn’t you daft twat.

You said The Ring “changed” their rankings to which Roy Jones was ranked in the Top 5 and Eubank was ranked at 168 when Calzaghe fought them.

That is a literal made up lie and the burden of proof is on you to back that up.

[QueensburyRules]

Well erm no you didn’t you daft twat.

You said The Ring “changed” their rankings to which Roy Jones was ranked in the Top 5 and Eubank was ranked at 168 when Calzaghe fought them.

That is a literal made up lie and the burden of proof is on you to back that up.

- - 1997 Ring rankings have Eubank ranked and Roy at #6.

Yo, Hambone, take it up with Ring or post your alleged BigShot Ring rankings from that issue month.