Tweet
Of course I mean Ezzard Charles. You guys talk so much you have probably done every topic. I will Try anyway.
Fitzsimmons
Burns
Willard
Braddock
Sharkey
Johannsen
L Spinks
Buster Douglas
Corbett, Sullivan and Patterson and Walcott must be question marks that might should go on my list too. Sullivan and to a lesser degree Corbett could only matbe win under 19th century protocols which should not come into paly any7way. Only an Buster Douglas who beat Tyson could beat Charles, on any other day of his career he must loses to the Cincinnati Cobra, I sincerely think. It is hard for me to think of Charles beating any other lineal heavyweight champions. I even put Briggs aroud even with him in a fight. That would sort of mean Charles was not a great heavyweight. I feel many non-champions would beat him. I feel he would not beat Ernie Shavers or Ken Norton, to name just a pair.
I hope did not make anyone too unhappy. I am sort of ignorant on boxing and sort of not, I was on a few forums.
Where did I go wrong if people of boxing think I did?
Fitzsimmons
Burns
Willard
Braddock
Sharkey
Johannsen
L Spinks
Buster Douglas
Corbett, Sullivan and Patterson and Walcott must be question marks that might should go on my list too. Sullivan and to a lesser degree Corbett could only matbe win under 19th century protocols which should not come into paly any7way. Only an Buster Douglas who beat Tyson could beat Charles, on any other day of his career he must loses to the Cincinnati Cobra, I sincerely think. It is hard for me to think of Charles beating any other lineal heavyweight champions. I even put Briggs aroud even with him in a fight. That would sort of mean Charles was not a great heavyweight. I feel many non-champions would beat him. I feel he would not beat Ernie Shavers or Ken Norton, to name just a pair.
I hope did not make anyone too unhappy. I am sort of ignorant on boxing and sort of not, I was on a few forums.
Where did I go wrong if people of boxing think I did?