Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How would of CARLOS MONZON VS MICHEAL SPINKS WENT?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    a heavy weight champion of the world being intimidated,i dont think so,he just is not a good fighter,how he beat holmes not once but twice is still mind boggling

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by poet682006 View Post
      Spinks had trouble with punchers....and this is based on which fights? The man was undefeated at Light-Heavy and the only puncher I can recall Spinks ever having trouble with was Tyson and in that instance Spinks was looking for a way out before the national anthem: It was intimidation not the fact that Tyson was a puncher that did Spinks in.

      Poet
      What was Cooney if not a puncher??

      Comment


      • #13
        i dont think wild left hooks are considered good punches

        Comment


        • #14
          Carlos Monzon is a top 15 fighter, the man was a animal in the ring. Shame Tony Mundine Sr had to have him as a champion, Tony was a good fighter who was Aussie Middlweight, Crusierweight and Heavyweight Champion. He also defeated Emille Griffith.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by ''The Man'' View Post
            Carlos Monzon is a top 15 fighter, the man was a animal in the ring. Shame Tony Mundine Sr had to have him as a champion, Tony was a good fighter who was Aussie Middlweight, Crusierweight and Heavyweight Champion. He also defeated Emille Griffith.
            what does this have to do with anything?who would of won monzon or m.spinks

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by mrboxer View Post
              what does this have to do with anything?who would of won monzon or m.spinks
              Because this is a thread about Monzon, and I'd thought I'd mention Tony Mundine Sr, a fighter who never really get's the credit he deserves and who fought Monzon for the Middlweight Title in 1974.

              That why..........

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Benncollinsaad View Post
                What was Cooney if not a puncher??
                Excactly.....and Spinks didn't exactly have a whole lot of trouble with him.

                Poet

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by poet682006 View Post
                  Excactly.....and Spinks didn't exactly have a whole lot of trouble with him.

                  Poet
                  Why do people just seem to judge Spinks off one fight, the Tyson fight? In his prime what a fighter. He dominated the richest filled era of LHW's.

                  Altought some think the era of Greb,Tunney, Loughran etc was stronger than the Spinks era. Which is a fair comment!

                  I think Spinks is just to big for Monzon at LHW a weight were Monzon never fought at either.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by ''The Man'' View Post
                    Why do people just seem to judge Spinks off one fight, the Tyson fight? In his prime what a fighter. He dominated the richest filled era of LHW's.

                    Altought some think the era of Greb,Tunney, Loughran etc was stronger than the Spinks era. Which is a fair comment!

                    I think Spinks is just to big for Monzon at LHW a weight were Monzon never fought at either.
                    It's typical though. Unfortunately in a lot of people's minds Spinks will only be that dude Tyson iced in 91 seconds.

                    Poet

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by poet682006 View Post
                      It's typical though. Unfortunately in a lot of people's minds Spinks will only be that dude Tyson iced in 91 seconds.

                      Poet
                      Which is pretty sad. Those people should go and watch him at LHW or were he took Larry Holmes's 0.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP