Originally posted by Demise
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by TheGreatA View PostHearns wanted to accomplish what no other fighter had accomplished before him which was to win world titles at 4 different weight classes.
He never had any plans staying at LHW, it was simply a part of his campaign to win titles at four different weights, although he did fight as a light heavy against when he beat Virgil Hill.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Benncollinsaad View PostYes I know. And? He had problems in that fight. He was staggered a couple times before finishing Roldan off.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View PostJuan"The Hammer"Roldan was a real tough Hombre.. Hearns said he was the toughest fighter he ever fought, Roldan was `thumbed`by Hagler or it may well have been a different outcome to their fight, Thomas Hearns always fought the very best opposition there was to fight, Benitez, Cuevas, Duran, Roldan, Hagler, Kinchen, DeWitt, Leonard, Hill, Barkley, Olajide, Andries... Hearns was a fantastic fighter and never ducked anyone, he always looked to make the best fight unfortunately Hagler wanted nothing of a rematch against Hearns
Comment
-
Originally posted by Benncollinsaad View Post**** Barkley! He was a streetfighter who never shoulda become a boxer. His style was so boring and exhausting to watch. He lost 19 fights, so how can anybody rate him as a good fighter I don't know. He was a mediocre boxer with a good left hook. Or was it right? Nevermind. He was John Ruiz of the 80's and 90's!
No matter if he won or lost. He brought excitement in all of his fights. Infact some would say he was unlucky to lose, close decisions against Michael Nunn, Roberto Duran. Records don't always tell the whole story, most of his losses come at the end of his career. And his losses in his prime. Were to top level fighters.
Lastly Thomas Hearns wasn't that past his prime, when he fought Iran Barkley in there 2nd meeting. He had just beat a prime undefeated Virgil Hill, in a great technical boxing match. Iran Barkley just had Thomas Hearns number end of.Last edited by Burning Desire; 08-27-2009, 08:11 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Burning Desire View PostYou couldn't be more wrong, Iran Barkley had some underrated boxing skills. He was outboxing Roberto Duran in some rounds, just working behind the jab. I don't know how you can all him boring either, he was in a FOTY. One of the best 1st rounds ever, aswell as one of the most dramatic turn arounds in boxing history.
No matter if he won or lost. He brought excitement in all of his fights. Infact some would say he was unlucky to lose, close decisions against Michael Nunn, Roberto Duran. Records don't always tell the whole story, most of his losses come at the end of his career. And his losses in his prime. Were to top level fighters.
Lastly Thomas Hearns wasn't that past his prime, when he fought Iran Barkley in there 2nd meeting. He had just beat a prime undefeated Virgil Hill, in a great technical boxing match. Iran Barkley just had Thomas Hearns number end of.And you are wrong, Hearns was past his prime in 1992. He had broken off with Steward also. That victory over Hill, which was a close fight, was his last swan song. He would go on to knock out some lesser fighters in the CW division, but we would never again see THE Tommy Hearns.
Comment
Comment