Tweet
Charles by UD
-
-
charles. dem was real fighters back then
charles would never lost to milk baby tarver -
-
-
Jones, Charles is to slow.Comment
-
Charles, anyone who says otherwise is ignore list material.
Thank you for saving me time for the future.Comment
-
Jones by UD
pre-2002 version of RJJ wins hands down, people really overrate the fighters in the old era, i have seen both of them fight and I have no doubt in my mind that RJJ wins this one, too much speed, too much ring intelligence.Comment
-
You people aer ignorant and/or unable to take your fan goggles off your eyes... serisously.
Charles had only 3 losses against 175ers. TWO were avenged. ONE was at age 19 against a veteran with a record of 118-18-6.
If Jones had the bad luck of turning pro during WW2, he would have his fair share of losses, like all the greats of that era.
Records from the 90s are different from records from the 40s, which are in turn different from the records of old-timers.
Place Charles in the pampered world of today's boxing and he will not finish his career with 25 losses. Place Jones fighting to avoid starving every 3 weeks and you can kiss 49-1 goodbye.
Charles is simply put the best fighter to come out of one of the best crop of MW-SMW-LHWS ever, they fought each other on a monthly basis. And Charles was pretty much the master.
If Jones fought in the same world, he would probably face in one year: Toney, Hopkins, Eubank, Benn, McLellan, some of them a couple of times... Repeat next year. Now maybe you see the record a bit different.Comment
-
charles would ud it.......although both have the power to ko each other I see both being too cautious (charles of jones speed and jones of charles power) to make it that interesting...if the fight was a 15 rounder Id see charles getting the ko...otherwise its a UD for charlesComment
Comment