Do you consider Joe Gans as the Greatest Lightweight of All Times???

[billeau2]

Says the guy who thought Gans was more technical than McFarland.

Who also said Lewis was the technical fighter, not Britton.

Who didn't know their series saw Britton take over as it progressed, and scored the only KO between the two.

Who claims Benny Bass, Kew Tendler, Kid Berg, Charlie Goldman, Artie Levine were all great technically sound, defensive Boxers because: Britz and Kinish.

e

Yeah and when I made such claims I want you to notice: Never had to insult anyone, belittle anyone, etc. Im not even going trough all the claims you ascribe to me because you are a lyer...

Be careful when you put words in mouths... I can tell you I never used the word "defensive" with "technical" for example... See? you cannot look at something and analyze it... Its a shame... Low IQ I s'pose. Want another example? when did I characterize Britton?

And a sshole? Show me Charlie GOldman the boxer... You do not even know who he was do you?

OWNED AGAIN!!! By your own hubris!!! I didn't have to tell you a thing... Lets argue about Goldman... I say he was a defensive, technical genius of a fighter... what say you Rusty?

[JAB5239]

I'm just curious.....if Gans didn't throw the McGovern fight, what the the reds motivation for saying he didn't even make an effort?

[QueensburyRules]

I'm just curious.....if Gans didn't throw the McGovern fight, what the the reds motivation for saying he didn't even make an effort?

What grade U in?

McG starched him early and often aka Wlad/Sanders.

Was that fixed too?

Of course!

Only in boxing, folks!

[JAB5239]

What grade U in?

McG starched him early and often aka Wlad/Sanders.

Was that fixed too?

Of course!

Only in boxing, folks!

Again, you didn't answer the question. You seem to have a real problem with that Mac. Tsk, tsk, tsk.

Funny how you believe Wlad was poisoned with zero evidence but you think the Gans-McGovern fight was on the up and up despite the crowds reaction, the refs own words and Gans admission.

[QueensburyRules]

Again, you didn't answer the question. You seem to have a real problem with that Mac. Tsk, tsk, tsk.

Funny how you believe Wlad was poisoned with zero evidence but you think the Gans-McGovern fight was on the up and up despite the crowds reaction, the refs own words and Gans admission.

Funny that Wlad, Vitali, Manny, me and my training buddy and too many others accept the overwhelming evidence provided that Wlad wAs drugged.

Gans was not drugged and the video proves he was overwhelmed early and often.

It happens.

Now go study up on Liston/Ali II and get back to us.

[JAB5239]

Funny that Wlad, Vitali, Manny, me and my training buddy and too many others accept the overwhelming evidence provided that Wlad wAs drugged.

Gans was not drugged and the video proves he was overwhelmed early and often.

It happens.

Now go study up on Liston/Ali II and get back to us.

Your not an expert. Neither is Manny, Wlad or Vitaly, or your supposed friend who you refuse to name. One doctor said it COULD BE, another DISMISSED IT. You're being eaten alive on this topic, and going down just like Wlad!! 😆

[QueensburyRules]

Your not an expert. Neither is Manny, Wlad or Vitaly, or your supposed friend who you refuse to name. One doctor said it COULD BE, another DISMISSED IT. You're being eaten alive on this topic, and going down just like Wlad!! 😆

- -Why should I release his name?

Like I stated, fight was highly su****ious a week out and only got worse.

Tools like U the reason boxing in disrepute. U a retire Vegas suit?

[JAB5239]

- -Why should I release his name?

Like I stated, fight was highly su****ious a week out and only got worse.

Tools like U the reason boxing in disrepute. U a retire Vegas suit?

Why bring someone up if you're not prepared to say their name? Unless of course you're making it up. You expect people to just believe your amateur opinion on poison as well. Not happening. As far as being su****ious a week out....post a link to it. You already claimed they shut down betting a week before the fight which is untrue. I showed where late money came in on on Brewster 2 days before the fight. So which is it? Either you have something backing your claims or you don't. But please don't expect us to just take YOUR word for it.

[QueensburyRules]

Why bring someone up if you're not prepared to say their name? Unless of course you're making it up. You expect people to just believe your amateur opinion on poison as well. Not happening. As far as being su****ious a week out....post a link to it. You already claimed they shut down betting a week before the fight which is untrue. I showed where late money came in on on Brewster 2 days before the fight. So which is it? Either you have something backing your claims or you don't. But please don't expect us to just take YOUR word for it.

- -Coulda made up a deceased big name boxing trainer and U could not refute-

Only two people watched the fight at the bar of two other johns smuggling the hoes who picked them up preparing for upstairs.

We can clearly see the 2rds of Gans/McG and it's irrefutable.

[JAB5239]

- -Coulda made up a deceased big name boxing trainer and U could not refute-

Only two people watched the fight at the bar of two other johns smuggling the hoes who picked them up preparing for upstairs.

We can clearly see the 2rds of Gans/McG and it's irrefutable.

Yet the ref said different. And what about the betting lines changing so drastically? Ahh, it's ok to use that argument with Wlad-Brewster, but not Gans-McGovern? How about the talk of the fix being in and Gans own admission? Far more evidence here for a fix than the Wlad-Brewster fight, that's for sure!