It's often said that Hearns made a mistake by going to war and exchanging with the larger, better-chinned Hagler. Hearns was quoted earlier as saying he'd battle it out in the trenches, although later on he said he had to in order to "get Hagler's respect".
But when I watch this fight, I really only see this strategy in the early going from Hearns. He tried to box mid-way through the round, and was having some success though you could argue he was loading too much on those right hands. Hagler cut him off and got him on the ropes, and Hearns was rocked late in the round.
The rest of the way, Hearns did try to box. He was just chopped down by Hagler, who had a perfect gameplan and fought a brilliant fight.
Outside of the very beginning, I don't see this "going to war" strategy from Hearns. He WAS trying to box and move.
But when I watch this fight, I really only see this strategy in the early going from Hearns. He tried to box mid-way through the round, and was having some success though you could argue he was loading too much on those right hands. Hagler cut him off and got him on the ropes, and Hearns was rocked late in the round.
The rest of the way, Hearns did try to box. He was just chopped down by Hagler, who had a perfect gameplan and fought a brilliant fight.
Outside of the very beginning, I don't see this "going to war" strategy from Hearns. He WAS trying to box and move.
Comment