Canelo-Golovkin Judges Will Also Face a Test on September 15


By Michael Rosenthal

Gennady Golovkin and Canelo Alvarez won’t be the only ones facing intense scrutiny on September 15 in Las Vegas. The judges also will be under a microscope.

The reason is obvious: The decision in the fighters’ first meeting – a split draw – was met with derision by most of those who watched the fight. The score of Adalaide Byrd – an absurd 118-110 (10-2 in rounds) for Alvarez – was particularly egregious, as even Alvarez’s camp acknowledged.

The last thing anyone wants is another scoring controversy, which might be the reason Nevada officials were particularly careful about choosing judges for the rematch.

Obviously, Byrd, who has continued to work as a judge, was out. Don Trella (114-114 in the first fight) also won’t be working the rematch. Instead, officials chose Dave Moretti (115-113 for Golovkin in the first fight) of Nevada, Steve Weisfeld of New Jersey and Glenn Feldman of Connecticut, highly respected judges all.

That should give everyone involved confidence in the system … but you never know.

One of the worse decisions I’ve witnessed was Felix Trinidad’s majority-decision victory over Oscar De La Hoya in their 1999 superfight in Las Vegas. I thought De La Hoya won eight of the first nine rounds, which, in my opinion, should’ve been enough to give him the victory even though he ran the final three rounds.

Instead, judges Jerry Roth (115-113) and Bob Logist (115-114) scored it for Trinidad while Glen Hamada had it a draw (114-114).

This is what might’ve happened. Las Vegas had become De La Hoya’s town. He was the superstar, he was the one filling the seats, he was the one bringing many millions of dollars to Vegas twice a year. And, for what it’s worth, his promoter, Bob Arum, has lived in Vegas for many years.

The perception going into the Trinidad fight was that it would be difficult for the Puerto Rican star to win a decision in Vegas even if he deserved it, which was a hot topic of discussion leading into the fight.

I always suspected that the judges were so determined to prove the doubters wrong – to prove they could be fair to Trinidad – that they bent over backward to give him every benefit of the doubt, which is what he needed to win a decision in that fight.

Could that be what happened in the first Golovkin-Alvarez fight? Alvarez, who is promoted by De La Hoya, was the bigger star, the one putting the majority of butts in the seats, the one who generates the biggest windfalls for Vegas when he fights there.

We’ll never know what was in the judges’ heads – especially Byrd’s – but such favoritism seems possible.

canelo-golovkin-fight (18)_1

And I wonder whether it could happen again in the rematch – only in reverse and for a different reason. Consensus was that Golovkin got screwed, which didn’t reflect well on Nevada. Officials don’t want the judges to screw him again, meaning they could feel pressure – whether conscious or subconscious -- to give Golovkin every break they can.

We know the result when that happened in the De La Hoya-Trinidad fight, at least according to my theory.

I’m not saying I anticipate a controversial decision, however that might look. I’m not that pessimistic. I have faith in all three judges, two of whom (the East Coast judges) have no connection to Nevada other than occasional assignments. They’ll probably do a fine job a week from Saturday.

That said, I don’t have to tell you that anything is possible when fights go to the scorecards. Crazy decisions are part of the fabric of boxing, sometimes when we least expect it.

The fans always demand fair decisions but, because of what happened in the first Golovkin-Alvarez fight, they’ll flip if we get another scoring controversy. Indeed, the judges will be under an unusual amount of pressure to get it right.

Just imagine how thick the tension will be between the final bell and the moment the decision is announced. Even if the fight turns out to be one-sided – particularly if Triple-G appears to have won – cynical fans won’t believe justice will be served until they see the right man have his hand raised.

Who knows, though? Maybe the judges won’t have to decide the winner. Maybe the fight will end in a knockout, which, if it’s clean, is the best way to avoid a controversy.

Michael Rosenthal is the most recent winner of the Boxing Writers Association of America’s Nat Fleischer Award for excellence in boxing journalism. He has covered boxing in Los Angeles and beyond for almost three decades.

User Comments and Feedback (Register For Free To Comment) Comment by TonyGe on 09-08-2018

How did Able do a terrible job during the fight?? I've been critical of him in prepping G but didnt see anything wrong during the fight. I believe he wanted G to go to the body more but G didn't…

Comment by Chuckguy on 09-08-2018

[QUOTE=Shadoww702;19080386]You really cant see a draw??? Also almost everyone now admits Sanchez did a poor job and if it wasnt for GGG's Jab Canelo would of won easy UD. Yes Byrd did a sht job. But it was easy to…

Comment by Robi13 on 09-08-2018

Canelo 163.2 Ggg 163.8

Comment by daggum on 09-08-2018

the judges got it wrong. it was 12-0 for canelo just like ward-kovalev. we shouldn't give pity rounds to guys just for doing a little better than we thought.

Comment by Shadoww702 on 09-08-2018

[QUOTE=Chuckguy;19080219]I think robbery is warranted when one judge had canelo winning 10 rounds and when the vast majority of the so callled experts and known boxers had ggg winning a close fight. I also think that what the article is…

Post a Comment - View More User Comments (27)
Top Headlines Bellew: I Have Power To Switch Usyk's Lights Off In Blink Of Eye Frank Warren: If Fury Beats Wilder - He's #1 at Heavyweight Frampton, Barnes, Conlan Discuss Rise of Belfast Boxing Scene Horn: If Crawford Rematch in Australia - Might Be Different Story! Miguel Gonzalez Beats Yader Cardoza By Unanimous Decision Raza Hamza To Fight, First Time Since Tragic Death of Brother Golovkin's Coach: Kellerman is One of The Most Biased on TV! Jorge Linares Would Love Jose Ramirez or Mikey Garcia Next Vinny Maddalone Reflects: I Was Always One Fight Away Sanchez Rejects Claims That Golovkin Faded in Canelo Rematch Sampson: Sergio Martinez Taking Dangerous Risk With Chavez Jr. Victor Ortiz, Days Before Fight, Charged With Sexual Assault Photos: Jorge Linares, Romero Duno Hold Open Workouts Gennady Golovkin Meets With Promoter, Discusses Future Plans Dogboe, Teofimo Lopez in Line For Lomachenko-Pedraza Card Wilder's Manager Doubts Joshua Fight Will Happen in 2019 Canelo-Golovkin - No Robbery, Embrace The Fight For What It Is George Groves Warns Smith: I'm in The Form of My Life Saul Rodriguez To Return on Berchelt-Roman ESPN+ Card Photo: Carl Frampton, Josh Warrington - Face To Face at Presser Canelo-GGG Rematch Earned Less $$$ From Tickets Than 1st Fight Claressa Shields-Christina Hammer Set For 11/17 In Atlantic City Wilder's Team Have 'No Desire' For New Meeting on Joshua Deal Matchroom Inks Eight Year Content Deal With DAZN Canada Lomachenko vs. Pedraza Official For December 8, MSG Theater Angel Acosta vs. Abraham Rodriguez Tops Golden Boy Card News: Zhang Zhilei, Junior Younan, Kai Robin Havnaa, More Billy Joe Saunders Hit With £100,000 Fine By The BBBoC Jessie Vargas vs. Thomas Dulorme To Have WBC Silver at Stake Cunningham: I'll Resurrect Lubin, Guarantee He Will Rule at 154 Hearn: If Fury Beats Wilder, Rematch Will Prevent Joshua-Fury WBC Prez on Porter-Spence Unification, Thurman's Direct Shot Tony Bellew: I Know I'll Find A Way To Beat Usyk; I Always Do JJ McDonagh Blasts Eubanks as "Fakes" Nicola Adams Aims To Blast Out Millan For WBO Crown Usyk: One Reason We Agreed To Face Bellew - Is To Get Joshua! Michael Conlan: Vladimir Nikitin Will Be My First Step Up Golovkin's Coach Doubts Age Will Be a Factor in Canelo Trilogy Brian Rose Vows To Make His Comeback in Top Form Incessant Sanctioning Silliness Prompts Alternative Crusade

Latest Active Forum Threads