Bookmark Website  | Free Registration  | The Team

Boxing Champions |  Boxing Schedule |  Boxing Video  |  Boxing History   |  Pound For Pound  | The Wire |  Audio  |  Arcade
WBC Chief: Khan-Garcia Winner Must Vacate One Title - Boxing News
 
Follow BoxingScene
 
Advertisement
BoxingScene Archive
• Boxing Articles
• Boxing Interviews
• Breaking News
• Boxing Press Releases
• Boxing Results
• World Boxing News
Search BoxingScene

>>>Advanced Search<<<
                                                                                                                                                            ...............

 Last update:  7/13/2012       Read more by David P. Greisman         
   
WBC Chief: Khan-Garcia Winner Must Vacate One Title
Mobile Version Share Click Here To Email   Search BoxingScene Database 

by David P. Greisman

The winner of this Saturday’s junior-welterweight unification bout between Amir Khan and Danny Garcia will have to vacate one of his two world titles, according to World Boxing Council President José Sulaimán.

Khan-Garcia will be for the WBC and WBA belts, though the unification won’t last for long.

That’s because the World Boxing Council hasn’t recently allowed for its world title to remain unified with other sanctioning body belts, though.

Just last month, 105-pound titleholder Kazuto Ioka defeated Akira Yaegashi, adding Yaegashi’s WBA title to his own WBC belt. Ioka and Yaegashi had been told beforehand that the winner would need to relinquish one of the titles. Ioka opted to keep the WBA belt and ditch the WBC.

And in another noteworthy instance three years ago, Timothy Bradley was told he’d have to pick between his WBC title and the WBO belt he’d just won from Kendall Holt. Bradley held onto the WBO belt and vacated the WBC.

The aforementioned bouts came with the WBC’s blessing in advance. The news of another belt other than their own being at stake for this weekend’s HBO headliner in Las Vegas was, well, news to the WBC’s leadership.
 
“It is a real surprise to know … that the WBA title is involved,” Sulaimán told BoxingScene.com via email Thursday night. “The WBC will accept only the WBC. Whoever doesn’t want it, the title is vacant.”

Garcia is the WBC’s titleholder, having won that vacant belt in March by defeating Erik Morales. The fight between Khan and Garcia has been marketed as being solely for the WBC belt.

Earlier this week, however, the World Boxing Association made official what had previously been rumored — the WBA returned its junior welterweight title to Khan, who had lost that belt against Lamont Peterson in December. Peterson tested positive for synthetic testosterone ahead of a since-canceled May rematch with Khan.

Peterson’s team admitted to using the substance for what it said was medical purposes ahead of the first Khan clash, which apparently was enough reason for the WBA to take the title from Peterson and give it back to Khan. The WBA also lists Marcos Maidana as its “regular” 140-pound titleholder.

David P. Greisman is a member of the Boxing Writers Association of America. Follow David on Twitter @fightingwords2 or send questions/comments via email at fightingwords1@gmail.com

Tags: Amir Khan , Danny Garcia , Khan-Garcia , Khan vs Garcia



 User Comments and Feedback (must register to comment)

comment by Mick Higgs, on 07-14-2012
More boxing political bull****. Unification is the only way forward.

comment by 1q3er5, on 07-14-2012
[QUOTE=Pirao]This could be a blessing in disguise, maybe this will prompt media like The RING, HBO, Showtime, etc, to stop regarding the WBC as a major title. Less trinkets = good for boxing.[/QUOTE] Interesting take on it. :tapedshut

comment by sensi_many, on 07-14-2012
I'm with Lil Floyd. Who cares about a belt? As long as you leave the ring knowing you just smashed the guy in the other corner, who cares about the trinket. There's too many belts in boxing anyway. There should be ONE champ in each division, all the whiners should just work that much harder to ge...

comment by alembic, on 07-13-2012
[QUOTE=anonymous2.0]Usually when you go up to a sports fan and ask him whose the #1 in his particular sport, he can give you a straight answer. Why can't we do that in boxing?[/QUOTE]There's no transparency enforced by a governing body that has a long-term caretaker role for the sport. The cu...

comment by Rhyme 4 Rhyme, on 07-13-2012
Year by year sanctioning bodies become less and less meaningful...

Post A Comment/View More User Comments (43) 

   
 Top Headlines
 Advertisement
 
 MMA Headlines
 
 Related Articles
  Frampton: Rigondeaux is Real WB...
  Petr Petrov Faces William Silva...
  Zoltan Petranyi is Ready To Fig...
  NSAC Rules to Proceed With Luis...
  Colorado's Power Punching Cardo...
  Karmazin: Sukhotsky Must Get KO...
  Sky Set To Roll Out 3 More PPV ...
  Michel on Beterbiev, Kovalev-Pa...
  Saunders, Joshua Co-Headline Ap...
  WBC Will Continue Their Fight A...

 Latest Active Forum Threads
Latest Active Threads
 Advertisement

 


Advertisement



Privacy Policy - Submit News - Feedback - Site Map - Advertise with Us

Copyright © 2003-2014 BoxingScene LLC. All rights reserved.