Advertisement
Advertisement
Boxingscene.com

WBA Explains Luis Ortiz's One Year Suspension in Full Resolution

By World Boxing Association

BACKGROUND FACTS

On September 25, 2017, the WBA Championships Committee issued Resolution No. 20170915117 clarifying the Heavyweight Division in light of Vladimir Klitschko’s retirement, and authorized Super Champion, Anthony Joshua (“Joshua”), to face the IBF’s mandatory, Kubrat Pulev (“Pulev”), before facing the WBA mandatory, Luis Ortiz (“Ortiz”). Joshua objected to Ortiz’s status as the mandatory based on the negotiations, and subsequent announcement that Ortiz would be fighting the WBC Champion, Deontay Wilder (“Wilder”), for the WBC Championship.

luis-ortiz-2

II. ORTIZ’S SECOND POSITIVE TEST FOR PROHIBITED SUBSTANCES

During the WBA’s consideration of Joshua’s objection to the September 25, 2017 Resolution, the WBC reported that Ortiz tested positive for prohibited substances Chlorothaizide and Hydrochlorathiazide during voluntary testing with the Voluntary Anti-Doping Association (“VADA”). Chlorothaizide and Hydrochlorathiazide are diuretics and potential masking agents.

Such a positive test violates WBA Rules and follows Ortiz’s positive test for steroids in September of 2014. Ortiz’s suspension for the steroid violation ended May 11, 2015.

After providing Ortiz notice of the positive test and an opportunity to explain and comment before the WBA made a decision on the matter, Ortiz confirmed that he knew he was taking prescription medication for health reasons, specifically for high blood pressure/hypertension, and had been doing so since September 2016. However, Ortiz did not disclose to his testers that he was taking prescription drugs, never requested a Therapeutic Use Exemption (“TUE”) prior to the positive test, and provided no evidence that he previously disclosed use of such substances in any prior bout. Instead, Ortiz now requests that he not be sanctioned because the substance was for therapeutic use.

When Ortiz’s justification was presented to VADA, VADA explained the following: Mr. Ortiz's test was performed under the WBC's Clean Boxing Program (CBP), which is administered by VADA. In other words, the applicable "rules" are the WBC-CBP Policy on TUE's, not VADA's (although the policies are very similar).

Sections 6 and 7 of the CBP's TUE Policy read as follows:

6. An application for a TUE will not be considered for retroactive approval except in extremely rare cases where:

a. emergency treatment or treatment of an acute medical condition was necessary, or

b. due to exceptional circumstances, there was insufficient time or opportunity for an applicant to submit, or the CBP to consider, an application prior to doping control.

7. The Athlete MUST inform the CBP as soon as possible by fax or email if one of these circumstances occur. A TUE will not be considered for retroactive appeal if there is a failure to timely inform the CBP of the exceptional circumstances."

Despite multiple opportunities to do so, Mr. Ortiz never declared that he was using a banned substance, nor sought a TUE prior to the test. Retroactive therapeutic use exemptions are only granted in the rare circumstances enumerated above, which is in line with other anti-doping programs worldwide. This is important in anti-doping, as allowing for retroactive TUE's would provide athletes a way to game the system by seeing whether or not they test positive and only alert the testing authority about a banned substance they've been knowingly taking if they test positive.

As a result of the positive test, Ortiz’s scheduled bout with Wilder for the WBC Championship was cancelled.

III. ANALYSIS

A. Boxers, their representatives, and promoters are obligated to “know and be familiar with all Associations rules.” WBA Rule C.14.

B. The WBA Ratings Committee and Chairman have sole discretion in ranking boxers and may consult and consider WBA ratings guidelines, ring performance, regional titles, bout activity or inactivity, failure to participate in WBA bouts and any other factor the Committee deems relevant. WBA Rule B.5-8.

C. No boxer who has tested positive for a prohibited substance can be rated, or be permitted to participate in a sanctioned bout for no less than six (6) months from the date of the positive test. WBA Rule C.45.

D. The WBA rules and medical guidelines adopt the prohibited substances list as identified by the International Olympic Committee (“IOC”), WBA Rule E. 24. The IOC has adopted the prohibited list published by WADA. Chlorothaizide and Hydrochlorathiazide are prohibited substances.

E. The Ratings Committee may demote or remove a boxer from the ratings for failure to comply with WBA Rules and for positive prohibited substances tests. WBA Rule B.6.

F. WBA Rule C.27 states:

Title Vacation and/or Removal of Recognition. A boxer’s title, status, or recognition may be lost, removed, or vacated for any of the following reasons:

a. Loss in a bout (see Rule C.15);

b. Violation of Association rules; or

c. Suspension, charges, or criminal conduct alleged or found by a national, state, or provincial agency.

IV. DECISION

As a result of Ortiz’s second positive test for a prohibited substance in a period of three (3) years, the Championship Committee orders as follows:

1. Ortiz’ status and recognition as mandatory contender is revoked. Ortiz is removed from the WBA ratings and suspended from participation in any WBA sanctioned bouts for one (1) year (until September 22, 2018). After March 22, 2018, Ortiz may request his suspension be lifted, which may only be granted in the sole discretion of the WBA. For the suspension to be lifted, Ortiz must continue to fully participate in the VADA Clean Boxing Program at his expense, shall not otherwise test positive for any prohibited substance or refuse to be randomly tested, and must undergo an independent medical evaluation to determine whether he is medically fit to fight.

Tags: Luis Ortiz image  
User Comments and Feedback (Register For Free To Comment) Comment by ScottWeiland on 11-03-2017

[QUOTE=daggum;18181063]are you saying that as a good or bad thing????[/QUOTE] I'm saying Wilder is such a courageous guy willing to step up and face such a mighty challenge from Breazeale, some may consider it a step backwards but not me…

Comment by daggum on 11-03-2017

[QUOTE=ScottWeiland;18181056]Wilder is fighting Breazeale next, what's your problem ?[/QUOTE] are you saying that as a good or bad thing????

Comment by ScottWeiland on 11-03-2017

[QUOTE=daggum;18180929]does anyone doubt that wilder and his team tricked ortiz with purposefully vague and hard to understand language in the paperwork to get him on a technicality. then they can run aruond saying look i tried to fight someone good…

Comment by MDPopescu on 11-03-2017

[QUOTE=daggum;18180929]does anyone doubt that wilder and his team tricked ortiz with purposefully vague and hard to understand language in the paperwork to get him on a technicality. then they can run aruond saying look i tried to fight someone good…

Comment by daggum on 11-03-2017

does anyone doubt that wilder and his team tricked ortiz with purposefully vague and hard to understand language in the paperwork to get him on a technicality. then they can run aruond saying look i tried to fight someone good…

Post a Comment - View More User Comments (9)
Top Headlines Kovalev-Mikhalkin, Bivol-Barrera in Works for 3/3 at MSG Theater Mayweather: Crawford is No. 1 Pound-for-Pound, Hands Down Christina Hammer Inks Promotional Pact With Salita Daniel Jacobs Wants Saunders for April Return at Barclays Center Shakhram Giyasov, Olympic Medal Winner, Set To Go Pro Bacskai Improves to 4-0, Eager To Keep Up Pace in 2018 Alberto Melian Makes 'Lomachenko Style' Debut With Big KO Blair Cobbs Inks Pact With Golden Boy Promotions Weekend Review: Saunders Shines Bright, Fury Returns Looms Saunders: Lemieux Handlers Made Mistake by Putting Up Big Ring Andre Ward: Barrera Gives Anyone at 175 a Run For Their Money Saunders' Trainer Prefers Golovkin Fight Over Facing Canelo Tyson Fury: I'm "Very Confident" Saunders Beats Golovkin Warrington: Lee Selby is Not Levels Above Me, I Can Beat Him! Cheeseman Pulls Out Of Metcalf Clash, Langford-Arnfield, More Marquez Reveals He Rejected $100 Million For Fifth Pacquiao Bout Video: Abner Mares Talks Frampton-Donaire, Santa Cruz Rematch Video: John Molina on His Big KO Win Over Ivan Redkach Horn Motivated To Impress American Fans By Shocking Crawford Maxim Vlasov vs. Vikapita Meroro on Dec. 21 in Moscow Video: Robert Guerrero Talks Garcia-Rios, Spence-Peterson Video: Hugo Centeno Talks Jermall Charlo Clash, More Saunders Victory Makes For Three-Headed Middleweight Monster Chavez Jr. Waiting For Angulo Contract, Wants To Know Numbers Cletus Seldin: 2018 Will Be My Year, I'll Be Much Better Next Time Video: Brandon Rios Talks Danny Garcia Fight, More Video: Nonito Donaire Talks Carl Frampton Fight, More Photos: Yves Ulysse Drops, Schools Cletus Seldin Over Ten Luis Nery vs. Shinsuke Yamanaka Rematch Close To Deal Saunders: I'll School Golovkin or Canelo Like I Did Lemieux! Jeff Horn is Firm, Wants "Millions" To Face Terence Crawford Amir Khan Eager To Return: I'm Going To Fight in March Trainer: Saunders Could’ve Finished Lemieux, But Wanted Rounds Trainer Ingle Always Thought Saunders Could Become 'Superstar' Adrian Granat Finishing Up Camp For Upcoming Ring Return Photos: Billy Joe Saunders Schools David Lemieux Over Twelve Saunders: Lemieux Performance Will Scare Off Canelo, Golovkin Fury: Saunders Gives Golovkin Trouble, But GGG's Not Lemieux Stephen Tiffney Suffers First Defeat To Lewis Paulin in Paisley Natasha Jonas Moves To 4-0 In Oldham, Targets Titles In 2018
Advertisement

Latest Active Forum Threads
Advertisement
Advertisement