Bookmark Website  | Free Registration  | The Team

Boxing Champions |  Boxing Schedule |  Boxing Video  |  Boxing History   |  Pound For Pound  | The Wire |  Audio  |  Arcade
Team Geale Dispute Soliman's Claims: Not So Fast Sam - Boxing News
Advertisement
BoxingScene Archive
 Boxing Articles
 Boxing Interviews
 Breaking News
 Boxing Press Releases
 Boxing Results
 World Boxing News
Follow BoxingScene
 
Search BoxingScene

>>>Advanced Search<<<
 Register A Free Account
 Account Login
 Boxing Schedule
 Boxing Champions
 Boxing Downloads
 Boxing Forums
 Boxing News Wire
 Boxing Photos
 Boxing History
 Boxer Search
 Fantasy Betting
 Feedback
 Fitness and Health  
 Free Homepage
 Mixed Martial Arts
 Pound For Pound
 Upcoming Fight Archive
                                                                                                                                                            ...............

 Last update:  2/5/2013       Read more by Boxing Clever         
   
Team Geale Dispute Soliman's Claims: Not So Fast Sam
Share Click Here To Email Printable version Search BoxingScene Database 

Daniel Geale's camp has refuted claims from fellow Australian boxer Sam Soliman that the pair have signed a deal to meet later this year.

Soliman is the mandatory challenger for Geale's IBF middleweight belt after his unanimous points win over Felix Sturm in Germany on the weekend.

The victory came just days after Geale defended the title against Anthony Mundine in Sydney, and this morning Soliman said his fellow Australian had given the fight the green light, with just the date to be finalised.

"We're going to get the shot, and we've locked it in on contract," the Victorian said.

"We're just waiting for the date and we'll be fighting."

However, News Ltd reports that Geale's manager Bill Treacy has shot down the Victorian's claims as they weigh up whether to seek permission from the IBF to make a lucrative voluntary defence first before facing Soliman.

"We've signed nothing," said Treacy. "There's a three-way hook-up on Thursday with me, (promoter) Gary Shaw and Daniel to decide what to do."

Tasmanian Geale, who is based in Sydney, was last year stripped of his WBA Super title when he opted to fight Mundine over mandatory challenger Gennady Golovkin.

Soliman (43-11, 17 KOs) said Geale (29-1-1 15 KOs) wouldn't risk losing another belt for not fulfilling a mandatory defence against him within 90 days.

"Having the title gives you leverage to negotiate other fights so how will he get a shot at them if he relinquishes," Soliman told SEN radio.

"He won't have any leverage, he won't have anything to put on the table.

"It's a no-brainer and not only that, how bad would it be for him when the whole world wants to see us go at it."

Soliman was considered a long-shot to topple the highly-rated Sturm on his home turf, particularly after a round two knock-down thanks to a potent German right hand.

But Soliman said after that he "fired up" and his frantic work-rate and awkward style wore Sturm down over he last three rounds.

He has a reputation as one of the nice guys of boxing, alongside Geale who gained a new legion of fans against the polarising Mundine.

Soliman didn't think the fight would lose any appeal without a "bad guy" element.

"What he's done in his career and what I've done in mine, we don't need that build-up.

"People just want to see two boxers go at it.

"We've both got so much on the line neither of us are going to take a step back."

Tags: Sam Soliman , Daniel Geale


 

 User Comments and Feedback (must register to comment)

comment by Bodyshot3, on 02-05-2013
Bound to happen When was the last time two modern era Aussies held a slice of the MW title or any other belt? Geale gets another belt and a very tidy pay cheque, Soliman gets a nice way to fill-up his pension fund and a proper reward after years of hard fighting. This is the nightmare s...

comment by Hougigo, on 02-05-2013
[QUOTE=jlcelestine]How can Team Geale be "gearing up for a lucrative optional defense" when they just came off of a lucrative optional defense? You had your optional. now fight your damn mandatory.[/QUOTE] Hopefully the optional defense he speaks of is a unification...

comment by jlcelestine, on 02-05-2013
How can Team Geale be "gearing up for a lucrative optional defense" when they just came off of a lucrative optional defense? You had your optional. now fight your damn mandatory.

comment by Ray*, on 02-05-2013
Ducking SSS like a boss, Geale want none of the beast..

comment by Tmann400, on 02-05-2013
[QUOTE=Earl Hickey]stfu team geal, you know you gonna fite this bum down in 'Stralia for a few of them aussie dollars and a trip to hungry jacks[/QUOTE]LOLWUT? Haha, oh Earl.

Post A Comment/View More User Comments (6) 

   
 Top Headlines
 Advertisement
 
 MMA Headlines
 
 Related Articles
  Team Golovkin Looking to Expand...
  Denver Cuello Returns To The ri...
  Jennings: That Was a Different ...
  Sanchez: I Give Golovkin a 9 ou...
  Vidal-Kantun Highest Rated Bout...
  Chaves: I Can Make Brandon Rios...
  De La Hoya: StubHub Was First C...
  Jose Zepeda in Line To Face Rio...
  Hearn on HBO using Froch quote,...
  Team Cotto: Golovkin Not Yet in...

 Latest Active Forum Threads
Latest Active Threads
 Advertisement

 


Advertisement



Privacy Policy - Submit News - Feedback - Site Map - Advertise with Us

Copyright 2003-2013 BoxingScene LLC. All rights reserved.