Bookmark Website  | Free Registration  | The Team

Boxing Champions |  Boxing Schedule |  Boxing Video  |  Boxing History   |  Pound For Pound  | The Wire |  Audio  |  Arcade
Team Fury Still Attempting To Secure Rahman For April 16 - Boxing News
Advertisement
BoxingScene Archive
• Boxing Articles
• Boxing Interviews
• Breaking News
• Boxing Press Releases
• Boxing Results
• World Boxing News
Follow BoxingScene
 
Search BoxingScene

>>>Advanced Search<<<
• Register A Free Account
• Account Login
• Boxing Schedule
• Boxing Champions
• Boxing Downloads
• Boxing Forums
• Boxing News Wire
• Boxing Photos
• Boxing History
• Boxer Search
• Fantasy Betting
• Feedback
• Fitness and Health  
• Free Homepage
• Mixed Martial Arts
• Pound For Pound
• Upcoming Fight Archive
                                                                                                                                                            ...............

 Last update:  4/7/2011       Read more by Rick Reeno         
   
Team Fury Still Attempting To Secure Rahman For April 16
Share Click Here To Email Printable version Search BoxingScene Database 

By Rick Reeno

BoxingScene.com was advised that Tyson Fury's team is still attempting to secure former WBC heavyweight champion Hasim Rahman (49-7, 40KOs). If they can close a deal, the fight will take place in a featured position on the Amir Khan-Paul McCloskey undercard on April 16 at the MEN Arena in Manchester.

As previously reported, and later confirmed, Rahman's trainer Eddie Mustafa Muhammad is not comfortable with his boxer taking such a fight on two weeks notice. After there appeared to be trouble with Rahman, the fight with Fury (14-0, 10KOs) was offered to tough veteran Kali Meehan (37-4, 30KOs). While Meehan accepted the fight, BoxingScene has now been told that Sky Sports rejected him as an opponent.

Khan Promotions [the lead promoter of the show] are actually trying to save the fight by raising Rahman's purse. But, the problem heads right back to Muhammad. Regardless of the money, he doesn't want Rahman to take the fight. And, when Rahman tried to push the issue on accepting the deal - Muhammad told him that he won't travel to Manchester to work the boxer's corner.

Tags: Hasim Rahman , Tyson Fury , Fury-Rahman , Fury vs Rahman


 

 User Comments and Feedback (must register to comment)

comment by JonoYoungP4P, on 04-08-2011
awful fight anyway

comment by buster007, on 04-08-2011
[QUOTE=gingeralbino]i fond it hard to belive that sky rejected Meehan. More like someone on Fury's team rejected Meehan. Hope he gets an opponent lined up, i want to see him fight live. Preferably against someone at least half decent.[/QUOTE] i agree. there's no way they would turn meeh...

comment by Jim Jeffries, on 04-07-2011
It'd be awfully short notice at this stage. Rahman doesn't look like he keeps in shape in between fights, either.

comment by Enzo Mc is SHIT, on 04-07-2011
It's no longer a PPV. That seems to imply that Fury can't get a decent opponent. Rahman should have taken this.

comment by gingeralbino, on 04-07-2011
[QUOTE=Box Up!]This fight won’t happen, it was never going to happen. It’s a marketing tool to boost PPV sales (everyone knows who Rahman is circa Lennox Lewis) I work in marketing and I know how all this works, Christ I’ve been doing it for years. Believe me, this fight will not happen,...

Post A Comment/View More User Comments (16) 

   
 Top Headlines
 Advertisement
 
 MMA Headlines
 
 Related Articles
  Loeffler: No Question About Gol...
  Rios-Chaves in Jeopardy Due To ...
  Bryant Jennings: Perez Point De...
  Shaw: Golovkin’s the Best 160-P...
  Antonio Escalante Busted for Al...
  Golovkin Could Be Back in Octob...
  Amir Khan Eyes Alexander, Guerr...
  Artur Beterbiev vs. Tavoris Clo...
  Loeffler: We Still Want Golovki...
  Shaw Not Happy With Kellerman "...

 Latest Active Forum Threads
Latest Active Threads
 Advertisement

 


Advertisement



Privacy Policy - Submit News - Feedback - Site Map - Advertise with Us

Copyright © 2003-2013 BoxingScene LLC. All rights reserved.