Bookmark Website  | Free Registration  | The Team

Boxing Champions |  Boxing Schedule |  Boxing Video  |  Boxing History   |  Pound For Pound  | The Wire |  Audio  |  Arcade
Peterson Scandal: VADA's Goodman Responds To Schaefer - Boxing News
Advertisement
BoxingScene Archive
• Boxing Articles
• Boxing Interviews
• Breaking News
• Boxing Press Releases
• Boxing Results
• World Boxing News
Follow BoxingScene
 
Search BoxingScene

>>>Advanced Search<<<
• Register A Free Account
• Account Login
• Boxing Schedule
• Boxing Champions
• Boxing Downloads
• Boxing Forums
• Boxing News Wire
• Boxing Photos
• Boxing History
• Boxer Search
• Fantasy Betting
• Feedback
• Fitness and Health  
• Free Homepage
• Mixed Martial Arts
• Pound For Pound
• Upcoming Fight Archive
                                                                                                                                                            ...............

 Last update:  5/8/2012       Read more by David P. Greisman         
   
Peterson Scandal: VADA's Goodman Responds To Schaefer
Share Click Here To Email Printable version Search BoxingScene Database 

by David P. Greisman

Margaret Goodman, the former chief ringside physician of the Nevada State Athletic Commission who is now the president of the Voluntary Anti-Doping Association, has responded to criticism about how her organization notified people about Lamont Peterson’s testing positive for testosterone ahead of his May 19 rematch with Amir Khan.

In a statement earlier today, Richard Schaefer of Golden Boy Promotions complained that VADA had not notified him or members of Khan’s team about the positive test. Schaefer said he did not learn of the test until Monday; Peterson’s team, meanwhile, learned on April 13 that his “A” sample had tested positive and found out on May 2 that his “B” sample had also been positive.

Goodman’s response was obtained by BoxingScene.com and follows below:

“It is important for VADA to carry out its mission consistent with respect for the privacy of the athletes who are tested.

“VADA notified Lamont Peterson and his attorney, Jeff Fried, immediately after Mr. Peterson’s ‘A’ sample tested positive.

“VADA felt that it would be inappropriate for it to notify third parties of the positive test result at that time because there had been no confirmation of it.

“It appears as though Mr. Peterson and Mr. Fried also chose not to notify third parties at that time in the hope that Mr. Peterson’s ‘B’ sample would test negative.

“As soon as Mr. Peterson’s ‘B’ sample tested positive, VADA notified Mr. Peterson, Mr. Fried, and the Nevada State Athletic Commission.

“Neither Golden Boy Promotions nor HBO was a signatory to the VADA contract.”

David P. Greisman is a member of the Boxing Writers Association of America. Follow David on Twitter at twitter.com/fightingwords2 or on Facebook at facebook.com/fightingwordsboxing, or send questions and comments to fightingwords1@gmail.com

Tags: Amir Khan , Richard Schaefer , Khan vs Peterson , Khan-Peterson , Lamont Peterson


 

 User Comments and Feedback (must register to comment)

comment by edgarg, on 05-09-2012
[QUOTE=Russian Crushin]Im not being accusatory, im just saying all the event that happened but you are seeming to dismiss them and replace em with your own theory Not to put you down, but have you actually read the articles of whats been revealed?[/QUOTE] I've read everything that has been pub...

comment by BattlingNelson, on 05-09-2012
[QUOTE=edgarg]Hello Battler, long time since we bumped into one another. I feel differently, don't know why, the whole thing soesn't seem natural. I can't believe a top fighter would arrange to have a VADA test and then deliberately ruin it by taking illegal drugs. I feel that he may have been pr...

comment by edgarg, on 05-09-2012
[QUOTE=BattlingNelson]Taking another test months after the positive test is futile and proves nothing. PEDerson made a positive test and must now face the consequenses. The only type of defense he can have now, as far as I see it, is if he can prove the test-procedure to be faulty. Untill then...

comment by BattlingNelson, on 05-09-2012
[QUOTE=edgarg]Don't be so accusatory for no reason, I' not starting a dispute. I'm merely saying that the second set of tests seems to have been a reaction by Peterson as soon as he got the bad news In his position if I were feeling "not guilty" I would immediately have the tests redone. And tha...

comment by spoonwars, on 05-09-2012
Funny how the OST advocates don't mention they're surprised Ariza's special shakes came out clean, while Peterson's the epitome of their STFU.

Post A Comment/View More User Comments (72) 

   
 Top Headlines
 Advertisement
 
 MMA Headlines
 
 Related Articles
  Wladimir Klitschko Laughs at Cl...
  John Jackson Gets Big Test in A...
  Silvio Branco Announces Retirem...
  Dusty Hernandez-Harrison to Ret...
  Floyd Mayweather Jr: I'll Truly...
  Russell: Lomachenko will be a l...
  Schaefer: Porter Has No Problem...
  Donaire Sr. Has Defensive Strat...
  Ryabinskiy: Alexander Povetkin ...
  Alex De Jesus Eager To Resume H...

 Latest Active Forum Threads
Latest Active Threads
 Advertisement

 


Advertisement



Privacy Policy - Submit News - Feedback - Site Map - Advertise with Us

Copyright © 2003-2014 BoxingScene LLC. All rights reserved. Material may not be replicated in any manner without the written consent of BoxingScene.com