Bookmark Website  | Free Registration  | The Team

Boxing Champions |  Boxing Schedule |  Boxing Video  |  Boxing History   |  Pound For Pound  | The Wire |  Audio  |  Arcade
Froch Responds To Scandal With Prolonging Fight For Bets - Boxing News
Advertisement
BoxingScene Archive
• Boxing Articles
• Boxing Interviews
• Breaking News
• Boxing Press Releases
• Boxing Results
• World Boxing News
Follow BoxingScene
 
Search BoxingScene

>>>Advanced Search<<<
• Register A Free Account
• Account Login
• Boxing Schedule
• Boxing Champions
• Boxing Downloads
• Boxing Forums
• Boxing News Wire
• Boxing Photos
• Boxing History
• Boxer Search
• Fantasy Betting
• Feedback
• Fitness and Health  
• Free Homepage
• Mixed Martial Arts
• Pound For Pound
• Upcoming Fight Archive
                                                                                                                                                            ...............

 Last update:  2/20/2012       Read more by Boxing Clever         
   
Froch Responds To Scandal With Prolonging Fight For Bets
Share Click Here To Email Printable version Search BoxingScene Database 

During a recent interview with BBC Radio Nottingham, former WBC super middleweight champion Carl Froch made some controversial comments regarding a past Commonwealth defense. The Nottingham boxer discussed how he dragged a title fight into a later round to enable members of his family to benefit financially from betting. The boxer expanded on comments made in his autobiography, published last year.

According to Froch, he could have finished his 2005 Commonwealth title defence against Ruben Groenewald earlier than he did. Froch could have finished the fight in the fourth round but says he deliberately avoided doing so because of family members who made bets on a fifth round stoppage. The British Boxing Board of Control said it would now speak to Froch.

He said: "I've done it more than one occasion and it was round five but that's not illegal. I can say, 'right, I'll stop this kid in round five'. If I'm good enough to do that then fair enough. I don't gamble but my brothers and my friends, they did quite well off it."

"I can openly say that because if I'm good enough to step on the gas in round five and force the stoppage then that's my privilege, and that's what I did in this particular fight at the Arena for the Commonwealth title defence. But the problem with that is I held him up in round four. He was there for the taking and I held him up, I got him with a shot, I could have ended up getting done myself in round four."

However, during another interview - this time with Sky Sports News HD - Froch said he was wrong to make to make the "throwaway" comment over deliberately prolonging fights so members of his family could win bets. The former two-time world champion is now looking to clear up the matter, explaining that it is simply "too dangerous" to try and pick and choose when to win a bout and says he never took part in these type of activities.

"Every time I fight, when good fighters fight, they often make predictions. It's all part of the media hype beforehand," Froch said. "On that particular occasion I made a prediction that I would win the fight in a certain round. But the comments made about prolonging the fight were a throwaway comment that, in hindsight, I shouldn't have said. I shouldn't have said that because I have never done that.

"It's too dangerous to try and attempt to do that in a fight. My brother might have had £5 on it, and I think he lost as well. He's not done very well out my career, gambling wise."

Tags: Carl Froch


 

 User Comments and Feedback (must register to comment)

comment by arraamis, on 02-20-2012
[QUOTE=BIGPOPPAPUMP]During a recent interview with BBC Radio Nottingham, former WBC super middleweight champion Carl Froch admitted to prolonging a title fight to enable members of his family to benefit financially from betting. The boxer expanded on comments made in his autobiography, published ...

comment by BartBears, on 02-20-2012
Nothing new, every boxer makes that.

comment by Scary, on 02-20-2012
[QUOTE=The_Golden_Boi]He couldn't have known that he could've taken out a certain fighter in a certain amount of rounds, I box and some times I feel like I could school someone but I wouldn't say that I would definitely do it in a certain round, if you know what I mean. He is just trying to bi...

comment by tripper, on 02-20-2012
Is this not about carl froch? Not amir khan. I made money off khan etting sparked from prescot due to his poor punch resistance at the weight. Plus i dont deal in dollars mate just pounds. I just mean who gives a fuk that he stopped a guy and his mates made money off it. I sure as hell dont

comment by junior gong, on 02-20-2012
The press(british) really has an agenda against boxing it would seem. This is old, but they choose to bring it up now after the Haye -Chisora debacle.

Post A Comment/View More User Comments (21) 

   
 Top Headlines
 Advertisement
 
 MMA Headlines
 
 Related Articles
  Schaefer Applauds MGM CEO's Rea...
  Mikey Garcia Explains His Legal...
  IMP Wins Purse Bid For Mendez-B...
  Nets Owner Instrumental in Barc...
  MGM Fiasco Increases The Top Ra...
  Schaefer Confirms Canelo-Lara i...
  Mayweather CEO Reacts To Top Ra...
  Bob Arum Smells Backdoor Handsh...
  DeGale vs. Gonzales Set For 5/3...
  Bob Arum Explains Further on Hi...

 Latest Active Forum Threads
Latest Active Threads
 Advertisement

 


Advertisement



Privacy Policy - Submit News - Feedback - Site Map - Advertise with Us

Copyright © 2003-2014 BoxingScene LLC. All rights reserved. Material may not be replicated in any manner without the written consent of BoxingScene.com