Advertisement
Advertisement

Froch Not Happy Over Groves Demand For Neutral Officials

Carl Froch has branded George Groves "paranoid" for demanding neutral officials for the pair's super-middleweight world-title rematch at Wembley in May.

Groves complained of bias to the British Boxing Board of Control after referee Howard Foster stopped November's first title bout in the ninth round, handing controversial victory to defending champion Froch.

Londoner Groves will refuse to fight Froch at Wembley on May 31 unless the BBBofC grant his demand for non-British officials.

Nonplussed Froch does not believe Groves' call will jeopardize the keenly-anticipated fight, that could set a new post-war British attendance record.

"I personally can't believe it, and I'm not happy about it," said 36-year-old Froch.

"We're all in this sport together, and the British Boxing Board of Control do a fantastic job.

"To say that we don't want them officiating potentially the biggest fight in British boxing history, it almost makes a mockery of the British Boxing Board of Control.

"It's a real shame, we've got two British fighters, we're going to leave it all in the ring, you've got to give George Groves a lot of credit for how he performed in his first fight, he did a good job.

"We would like to think that our referees, our officials, our judges could play a part in the whole event.

"To say that they're not invited to the party, when it's happening on our soil, I'm sure that they could turn around and refuse to sanction the fight.

"If that happens it wouldn't be able to be held on British soil.

"This will unfold, but it's George again playing clever clogs.

"Possibly he's paranoid about upsetting a lot of officials, from the last one, and he might feel it's going to have some backlash.

"I don't think something like that would mean that this fight doesn't happen, I really don't think that.

"But it's something that's going to need discussing and ironing out."

Groves hopes for compromise as he awaits a response from the BBBofC, but still claims the fight is "conditional" on the appointment of neutral officials.

Groves claims referee Foster responded to a Facebook post suggesting Froch would win in the ninth round ahead of the first bout.

The Hammersmith-born fighter said his grievance with the BBBofC was appeased by the IBF issuing the mandatory rematch.

Now Groves has the fight, he is also battling against the appointment of officials he believes could fall prey to public prejudice ahead of the May showdown.

"It's conditional that there are no UK officials: otherwise I don't ring walk," said Groves.

"I have respect for the British Boxing Board of Control, but they failed me in the first fight, this is a huge fight that has to take place.

"And if they insist upon placing one of their officials, who will be susceptible to the build-up - because how can you not? - then I won't fight.

"Someone wrote a Facebook status along the lines of "looking good Carl Froch in the ninth" with a question-mark that he liked.

"It may sound pathetic but it's a public statement on a social network for the whole world to see.

"I'm not even friends with Howard Foster and I could see it from my account.

"Whether it's conscious or sub-conscious, either way it would have an effect on the fight, it has made him biased, as well as the media, saying Carl Froch is the established champion so it's a one-horse race.

"We raised it with the British Boxing Board of Control and we feel we were fobbed off.

"Ultimately the IBF said they couldn't judge someone on a Facebook page but what we can do is look at the stoppage, and the stoppage was incorrect, so that's why I've got my rematch.

"Eddie (Hearn) and my solicitors are working on what happens next now.

"We'll find a compromise, I'm not here to alienate the British Boxing Board of Control, but we feel we have more than a valid point, and the fight is conditional upon it.

"I feel that whether conscious or otherwise, first time there was bias in Carl Froch's favour against me and it cost me the fight, and I don't want that again."

User Comments and Feedback (Register For Free To Comment) Comment by Tonyu on 03-11-2014

Actually thinking about it Groves might have grounds as this is a IBF fight and not a British title fight it is only been staged on British soil so really the IBF should have the final say. The IBF have…

Comment by Tonyu on 03-11-2014

You can't blame Groves really he put his faith in the officials first time round and was screwed over - Froch should rather be quiet the more he speaks the more he sounds like a complete buffoon- that been said…

Comment by Mooshashi on 03-10-2014

I hear Laurence Cole is available on 31 May.......

Comment by ArturoBalboa on 03-10-2014

Paranoid? Forget the stoppage. Can anyone on here, even fans of Froch, make a case for how 2 of the judges had Groves just one round ahead at the end of the fight.

Comment by Dirk Diggler UK on 03-10-2014

Howard Foster is just a sh1t referee all round. It's nothing to do with whether he's "neutral" or not.

Post a Comment - View More User Comments (41)
Top Headlines Froch Thinks Golovkin Will Struggle With Ramirez, 168 Power Arum: Manny Pacquiao Wants To Fight Again, Not Sure He Can Yet Klitschko Manager Wants Full Investigation on Fury Doping Claim Roman Gonzalez, Carlos Cuadras Trade Heated Words Oscar Valdez Ready For The Danger of Hard Punching Rueda Ryan Martin To Make Ring Return on Wilder vs. Arreola Card Povetkin Holds Meeting With WBC: Awaits Decision on Wilder Golovkin, Eubank Jr. Should Sign By This Weekend, Says Hearn SHO's Espinoza: Canelo-GGG in "Fall 2017" Was To Stop Bleeding Photos: Mario Barrios Putting in Work For World Title Eliminator Roman Gonzalez Focused on Cuadras Next, For The Right Price Parker's Promoter: Anthony Joshua Will Eat The Jab All Night! Cecilia Braekhus Returns, Tops First Card in Norway Since 1980 Manuel Avila Continues Unbeaten Run at Cache Creek Casino Smith's Trainer: We Can Beat Canelo, But Will The Judges Agree? News: Boxeo Telemundo Update; Skeete-Lepelley; Jay Harris Thurman Might Make Mandatory Defense Against Avanesyan Next Jonathan Guzman Ready For Wake Title Shot Rabchenko Handed IBF Eliminator On Santa Cruz-Frampton Card Hurd Wants Foes Like Bundrage, Ishe Smith For Upcoming Fights DiBella: Wilder vs. Joshua is Inevitable in Future, But Not Now Canelo Alvarez vs. Liam Smith is NOT a Bad Fight, Explains Hearn Haye: Bellew Fight Must Be at Heavyweight, He Must Add Weight Anthony Mundine Back in Talks For Danny Green Rematch Knockout CP Freshmart Decisions Rojas In A Stinker Ganigan Lopez vs. Jonathan Taconing Will Be a War, Says WBC Joseph Parker Ready To Take November Date For Anthony Joshua Amir Imam, Guillermo Jones Return on Pittsburgh Card Arum: After Ramirez Beats Golovkin, He Will Be a Big PPV Star! Keith Thurman vs. Danny Garcia: The Fight, Right Now Photos: Mayweather Takes Part in BET Celebrity Basketball Game Ramirez's Adviser: Golovkin One-Dimensional, He's No '85 Bears! Mike Tyson Will Back Trump at Republican National Convention Edner Cherry Snags Debatable Decision Over Lydell Rhodes Antonio Margarito vs. Ramon Alvarez Pushed Back To August 13 Photos: Jose Benavidez Putting in Work For Francisco Santana Rolando Garza Inks Promotional With Roy Jones Jr. Boxing Gilberto Ramirez: Canelo Has No Pride, His Actions Disappointing Denis Lebedev Backs Glowacki To Retain, Beat Oleksandr Usyk Anthony Joshua Must Face Joseph Parker By January 9, Says IBF
Advertisement

Latest Active Forum Threads
Advertisement
Advertisement