Advertisement
Advertisement
Boxingscene.com

Froch Not Happy Over Groves Demand For Neutral Officials

Carl Froch has branded George Groves "paranoid" for demanding neutral officials for the pair's super-middleweight world-title rematch at Wembley in May.

Groves complained of bias to the British Boxing Board of Control after referee Howard Foster stopped November's first title bout in the ninth round, handing controversial victory to defending champion Froch.

Londoner Groves will refuse to fight Froch at Wembley on May 31 unless the BBBofC grant his demand for non-British officials.

Nonplussed Froch does not believe Groves' call will jeopardize the keenly-anticipated fight, that could set a new post-war British attendance record.

"I personally can't believe it, and I'm not happy about it," said 36-year-old Froch.

"We're all in this sport together, and the British Boxing Board of Control do a fantastic job.

"To say that we don't want them officiating potentially the biggest fight in British boxing history, it almost makes a mockery of the British Boxing Board of Control.

"It's a real shame, we've got two British fighters, we're going to leave it all in the ring, you've got to give George Groves a lot of credit for how he performed in his first fight, he did a good job.

"We would like to think that our referees, our officials, our judges could play a part in the whole event.

"To say that they're not invited to the party, when it's happening on our soil, I'm sure that they could turn around and refuse to sanction the fight.

"If that happens it wouldn't be able to be held on British soil.

"This will unfold, but it's George again playing clever clogs.

"Possibly he's paranoid about upsetting a lot of officials, from the last one, and he might feel it's going to have some backlash.

"I don't think something like that would mean that this fight doesn't happen, I really don't think that.

"But it's something that's going to need discussing and ironing out."

Groves hopes for compromise as he awaits a response from the BBBofC, but still claims the fight is "conditional" on the appointment of neutral officials.

Groves claims referee Foster responded to a Facebook post suggesting Froch would win in the ninth round ahead of the first bout.

The Hammersmith-born fighter said his grievance with the BBBofC was appeased by the IBF issuing the mandatory rematch.

Now Groves has the fight, he is also battling against the appointment of officials he believes could fall prey to public prejudice ahead of the May showdown.

"It's conditional that there are no UK officials: otherwise I don't ring walk," said Groves.

"I have respect for the British Boxing Board of Control, but they failed me in the first fight, this is a huge fight that has to take place.

"And if they insist upon placing one of their officials, who will be susceptible to the build-up - because how can you not? - then I won't fight.

"Someone wrote a Facebook status along the lines of "looking good Carl Froch in the ninth" with a question-mark that he liked.

"It may sound pathetic but it's a public statement on a social network for the whole world to see.

"I'm not even friends with Howard Foster and I could see it from my account.

"Whether it's conscious or sub-conscious, either way it would have an effect on the fight, it has made him biased, as well as the media, saying Carl Froch is the established champion so it's a one-horse race.

"We raised it with the British Boxing Board of Control and we feel we were fobbed off.

"Ultimately the IBF said they couldn't judge someone on a Facebook page but what we can do is look at the stoppage, and the stoppage was incorrect, so that's why I've got my rematch.

"Eddie (Hearn) and my solicitors are working on what happens next now.

"We'll find a compromise, I'm not here to alienate the British Boxing Board of Control, but we feel we have more than a valid point, and the fight is conditional upon it.

"I feel that whether conscious or otherwise, first time there was bias in Carl Froch's favour against me and it cost me the fight, and I don't want that again."

User Comments and Feedback (Register For Free To Comment) Comment by Tonyu on 03-11-2014

Actually thinking about it Groves might have grounds as this is a IBF fight and not a British title fight it is only been staged on British soil so really the IBF should have the final say. The IBF have…

Comment by Tonyu on 03-11-2014

You can't blame Groves really he put his faith in the officials first time round and was screwed over - Froch should rather be quiet the more he speaks the more he sounds like a complete buffoon- that been said…

Comment by Mooshashi on 03-10-2014

I hear Laurence Cole is available on 31 May.......

Comment by ArturoBalboa on 03-10-2014

Paranoid? Forget the stoppage. Can anyone on here, even fans of Froch, make a case for how 2 of the judges had Groves just one round ahead at the end of the fight.

Comment by Dirk Diggler UK on 03-10-2014

Howard Foster is just a sh1t referee all round. It's nothing to do with whether he's "neutral" or not.

Post a Comment - View More User Comments (41)
Top Headlines Mikey Garcia: Adrien Broner Will Be Surprised at How Good I Am Paulie Malignaggi Breaks Down Adrien Broner vs. Mikey Garcia Garcia: Don't Know if Top Rank Would Make Crawford Fight With Me Gutierrez Vows: I'm Going To Ruin Carl Frampton's Big Night! Raymundo Beltran Still Fighting Hard To Secure His Green Card David Haye Makes Moves To Face Hughie Fury - If He Wins Title Video: Juan Francisco Estrada Motivated To Make Statement Roy Jones Jr. Wants a Showdown With Tony Bellew Video: Carlos Cuadras Eager To Shock Juan Francisco Estrada Kell Brook: I Want Miguel Cotto! Does He Fancy The Job? Video: Roman Gonzalez on The Rematch With Sor Rungvisia Adrien Broner-Mikey Garcia: Good Fight, Rewards Later Randy Caballero vs. Diego De La Hoya in Play For Canelo-Golovkin Robert Garcia: Arum Would Never Let Lomachenko Fight Mikey! Video: Marco Antonio Barrera on Mayweather-McGregor, More McGregor Reacts To Mike Tyson, Says Critics Will 'Eat Their Words' Video: Tom Loeffler on Super Flyweight Triple, Canelo-Golovkin Video: Katie Taylor Talks Bout on Broner-Garcia Card Video: Jermall Charlo Talks 160 Run, Broner-Garcia, More Malignaggi: McGregor an Above Average Puncher, Very Accurate AIBA President Set To Be Ousted as Internal Rift Continues Linares-Campbell Could Land on September 23 in LA, Says Hearn Broner: Don't Care About Mayweather-McGregor, No $$$ In It for Me Photos: Katie Taylor Showing Off Her Moves in New York City Photos: Jarrell Miller, Gerald Washington - Open Workouts Photos: Jermall Charlo, Jorge Sebastian Heiland Putting in Work Photos: Miguel Cotto Grinding Hard For Kamegai Showdown White Explains Why Mayweather-McGregor Will Be a Good Fight Photos: Zou Shiming, Sho Kimura - Face To Face at Final Presser Victor Ortiz: I Can Be One of The Best at 147, There For The Taking! Tyson Fury Announces His Retirement Again on Social Media? Mayweather-McGregor: Odds, Props Movements - 1 Month Out Anthony Fowler Gets Foe For Liverpool Return Rau'shee Warren-McJoe Arroyo: Olympians on the Outside Katie Taylor Aims To Be Impressive on Broner-Garcia Card UK News: Singh Back With Warren; Buatsi and Cordina Return Oleksandr Usyk vs. Marco Huck on September 9 in Berlin Team Donaire Praise Ringstar, Target Mares, Santa Cruz, Frampton Ellerbe: Broner Will Prove All the Naysayers Wrong Against Garcia Jermell Charlo: I'm Backing GGG, Canelo Avoided Me and Brother!
Advertisement

Latest Active Forum Threads
Advertisement
Advertisement