Advertisement
Advertisement

Froch Not Happy Over Groves Demand For Neutral Officials

Carl Froch has branded George Groves "paranoid" for demanding neutral officials for the pair's super-middleweight world-title rematch at Wembley in May.

Groves complained of bias to the British Boxing Board of Control after referee Howard Foster stopped November's first title bout in the ninth round, handing controversial victory to defending champion Froch.

Londoner Groves will refuse to fight Froch at Wembley on May 31 unless the BBBofC grant his demand for non-British officials.

Nonplussed Froch does not believe Groves' call will jeopardize the keenly-anticipated fight, that could set a new post-war British attendance record.

"I personally can't believe it, and I'm not happy about it," said 36-year-old Froch.

"We're all in this sport together, and the British Boxing Board of Control do a fantastic job.

"To say that we don't want them officiating potentially the biggest fight in British boxing history, it almost makes a mockery of the British Boxing Board of Control.

"It's a real shame, we've got two British fighters, we're going to leave it all in the ring, you've got to give George Groves a lot of credit for how he performed in his first fight, he did a good job.

"We would like to think that our referees, our officials, our judges could play a part in the whole event.

"To say that they're not invited to the party, when it's happening on our soil, I'm sure that they could turn around and refuse to sanction the fight.

"If that happens it wouldn't be able to be held on British soil.

"This will unfold, but it's George again playing clever clogs.

"Possibly he's paranoid about upsetting a lot of officials, from the last one, and he might feel it's going to have some backlash.

"I don't think something like that would mean that this fight doesn't happen, I really don't think that.

"But it's something that's going to need discussing and ironing out."

Groves hopes for compromise as he awaits a response from the BBBofC, but still claims the fight is "conditional" on the appointment of neutral officials.

Groves claims referee Foster responded to a Facebook post suggesting Froch would win in the ninth round ahead of the first bout.

The Hammersmith-born fighter said his grievance with the BBBofC was appeased by the IBF issuing the mandatory rematch.

Now Groves has the fight, he is also battling against the appointment of officials he believes could fall prey to public prejudice ahead of the May showdown.

"It's conditional that there are no UK officials: otherwise I don't ring walk," said Groves.

"I have respect for the British Boxing Board of Control, but they failed me in the first fight, this is a huge fight that has to take place.

"And if they insist upon placing one of their officials, who will be susceptible to the build-up - because how can you not? - then I won't fight.

"Someone wrote a Facebook status along the lines of "looking good Carl Froch in the ninth" with a question-mark that he liked.

"It may sound pathetic but it's a public statement on a social network for the whole world to see.

"I'm not even friends with Howard Foster and I could see it from my account.

"Whether it's conscious or sub-conscious, either way it would have an effect on the fight, it has made him biased, as well as the media, saying Carl Froch is the established champion so it's a one-horse race.

"We raised it with the British Boxing Board of Control and we feel we were fobbed off.

"Ultimately the IBF said they couldn't judge someone on a Facebook page but what we can do is look at the stoppage, and the stoppage was incorrect, so that's why I've got my rematch.

"Eddie (Hearn) and my solicitors are working on what happens next now.

"We'll find a compromise, I'm not here to alienate the British Boxing Board of Control, but we feel we have more than a valid point, and the fight is conditional upon it.

"I feel that whether conscious or otherwise, first time there was bias in Carl Froch's favour against me and it cost me the fight, and I don't want that again."

User Comments and Feedback (Register For Free To Comment) Comment by Tonyu on 03-11-2014

Actually thinking about it Groves might have grounds as this is a IBF fight and not a British title fight it is only been staged on British soil so really the IBF should have the final say. The IBF have…

Comment by Tonyu on 03-11-2014

You can't blame Groves really he put his faith in the officials first time round and was screwed over - Froch should rather be quiet the more he speaks the more he sounds like a complete buffoon- that been said…

Comment by Mooshashi on 03-10-2014

I hear Laurence Cole is available on 31 May.......

Comment by ArturoBalboa on 03-10-2014

Paranoid? Forget the stoppage. Can anyone on here, even fans of Froch, make a case for how 2 of the judges had Groves just one round ahead at the end of the fight.

Comment by Dirk Diggler UK on 03-10-2014

Howard Foster is just a sh1t referee all round. It's nothing to do with whether he's "neutral" or not.

Post a Comment/View More User Comments (41)
Top Headlines Khan: Mayweather, Pacquiao Would Be Easier Than Canelo! Ballisai Replaces Kevin Mitchell in Tatli EBU Title Fight on 3/18 Pungluang Sor Singyu Retains WBO Belt With Technical Nod Win Mayweather Stumped on Who Would Win Fury vs. Wilder Floyd Mayweather: Timing Was Not Right For Amir Khan Bout Roy Jones Jr. and Kevin Mitchell: A Tale of Two Retirements McWilliams Arroyo Creeps In, Eyed For Roman Gonzalez Bout Marquez Says There Have Been Talks For Miguel Cotto Bout Photos: Povetkin Getting Jacked, in Beast Mode For Deontay Wilder Estrada's Promoter Questions Chocolatito's Pound For Pound Rank Luis Ortiz Content With Random Testing To Prove He's Clean Bob Arum: I Don't Ever Want To Retire! Why Would I? Robert Garcia Hopes Brother Mikey is Back in First Half of 2016 Tarver's Suspension Upheld, Fined $50K For Positive PED Test Lucas Matthysse-Pablo Cesar Cano Showdown in Talks Bob Arum Continues To Be The Master of Salesmanship Pungluang Sor Singyu Defends WBO Belt Against Pabustan Luis Ortiz Hopes Activity Level Doesn't Slow Down Anytime Soon Chavez Jr. Training Hard For Possible Jack Bout, Says Garcia Lebedev Will Go With Ramirez Unification First, Then Mandatory Mike Tyson Returns For Round 2 at The MGM Grand Antonio Orozco-Miguel Acosta Set For 3/25 at Fantasy Springs David Haye Tells Joshua Not To Risk His '0' Before They Fight McGuigan Believes Frampton vs. Quigg is a Crossover Fight Flanagan-Mathews: Zolani Tete To Face Jose Santos Gonzalez Sullivan Barrera: My Goal is To Knock Andre Ward Out! Blackwell-Eubank Jr. Set For March 26 At Wembley Garcia: Canelo vs. Khan is Going To Be a Pretty Close Fight Ricky Hatton Discusses Several Emotional Topics on Life, Career Loeffler: We Expect Canelo To Defend Against Golovkin Video: Robert Garcia on Brandon Rios, Canelo-Khan, More Sauerland: Abraham Win Could Make Groves Bout Much Bigger Theophane: Mayweather Will Advise Me on How To Beat Broner Golovkin Keeps The Line Moving in Supremacy Quest at 160 Boxing Priest Makes Boxing Comeback After 20 Years Arum Spoke To HBO About Making Golovkin vs. Ramirez Jorge Linares Injury Puts Zlaticanin Title Fight In Jeopardy Omar Narvaez To Face Jesus Vargas on February 19th Roach Says Gomez, Ramirez on Board To Help Manny Pacquiao Roy Jones Jr. Rejects Retirement Talk, Return is Not Ruled Out
Advertisement

Latest Active Forum Threads
Advertisement
Advertisement