Advertisement
Advertisement
Boxingscene.com

Froch Not Happy Over Groves Demand For Neutral Officials

Carl Froch has branded George Groves "paranoid" for demanding neutral officials for the pair's super-middleweight world-title rematch at Wembley in May.

Groves complained of bias to the British Boxing Board of Control after referee Howard Foster stopped November's first title bout in the ninth round, handing controversial victory to defending champion Froch.

Londoner Groves will refuse to fight Froch at Wembley on May 31 unless the BBBofC grant his demand for non-British officials.

Nonplussed Froch does not believe Groves' call will jeopardize the keenly-anticipated fight, that could set a new post-war British attendance record.

"I personally can't believe it, and I'm not happy about it," said 36-year-old Froch.

"We're all in this sport together, and the British Boxing Board of Control do a fantastic job.

"To say that we don't want them officiating potentially the biggest fight in British boxing history, it almost makes a mockery of the British Boxing Board of Control.

"It's a real shame, we've got two British fighters, we're going to leave it all in the ring, you've got to give George Groves a lot of credit for how he performed in his first fight, he did a good job.

"We would like to think that our referees, our officials, our judges could play a part in the whole event.

"To say that they're not invited to the party, when it's happening on our soil, I'm sure that they could turn around and refuse to sanction the fight.

"If that happens it wouldn't be able to be held on British soil.

"This will unfold, but it's George again playing clever clogs.

"Possibly he's paranoid about upsetting a lot of officials, from the last one, and he might feel it's going to have some backlash.

"I don't think something like that would mean that this fight doesn't happen, I really don't think that.

"But it's something that's going to need discussing and ironing out."

Groves hopes for compromise as he awaits a response from the BBBofC, but still claims the fight is "conditional" on the appointment of neutral officials.

Groves claims referee Foster responded to a Facebook post suggesting Froch would win in the ninth round ahead of the first bout.

The Hammersmith-born fighter said his grievance with the BBBofC was appeased by the IBF issuing the mandatory rematch.

Now Groves has the fight, he is also battling against the appointment of officials he believes could fall prey to public prejudice ahead of the May showdown.

"It's conditional that there are no UK officials: otherwise I don't ring walk," said Groves.

"I have respect for the British Boxing Board of Control, but they failed me in the first fight, this is a huge fight that has to take place.

"And if they insist upon placing one of their officials, who will be susceptible to the build-up - because how can you not? - then I won't fight.

"Someone wrote a Facebook status along the lines of "looking good Carl Froch in the ninth" with a question-mark that he liked.

"It may sound pathetic but it's a public statement on a social network for the whole world to see.

"I'm not even friends with Howard Foster and I could see it from my account.

"Whether it's conscious or sub-conscious, either way it would have an effect on the fight, it has made him biased, as well as the media, saying Carl Froch is the established champion so it's a one-horse race.

"We raised it with the British Boxing Board of Control and we feel we were fobbed off.

"Ultimately the IBF said they couldn't judge someone on a Facebook page but what we can do is look at the stoppage, and the stoppage was incorrect, so that's why I've got my rematch.

"Eddie (Hearn) and my solicitors are working on what happens next now.

"We'll find a compromise, I'm not here to alienate the British Boxing Board of Control, but we feel we have more than a valid point, and the fight is conditional upon it.

"I feel that whether conscious or otherwise, first time there was bias in Carl Froch's favour against me and it cost me the fight, and I don't want that again."

User Comments and Feedback (Register For Free To Comment) Comment by Tonyu on 03-11-2014

Actually thinking about it Groves might have grounds as this is a IBF fight and not a British title fight it is only been staged on British soil so really the IBF should have the final say. The IBF have…

Comment by Tonyu on 03-11-2014

You can't blame Groves really he put his faith in the officials first time round and was screwed over - Froch should rather be quiet the more he speaks the more he sounds like a complete buffoon- that been said…

Comment by Mooshashi on 03-10-2014

I hear Laurence Cole is available on 31 May.......

Comment by ArturoBalboa on 03-10-2014

Paranoid? Forget the stoppage. Can anyone on here, even fans of Froch, make a case for how 2 of the judges had Groves just one round ahead at the end of the fight.

Comment by Dirk Diggler UK on 03-10-2014

Howard Foster is just a sh1t referee all round. It's nothing to do with whether he's "neutral" or not.

Post a Comment - View More User Comments (41)
Top Headlines De La Hoya Leaning To Las Vegas For Canelo vs. Chavez Jr. Clash Tony Harrison vs. Jarrett Hurd on Wilder-Wawrzyk Undercard Frampton Feels He Needs to Do More to Be Best Irish Boxer Ever Oscar Valdez is Back in Training, Aims To Have a 'Bigger' 2017 WBA Prez Firm That Joshua-Klitschko Winner Must Face Luis Ortiz Manny Pacquiao Says Jeff Horn Fight Deal is Not Finalized, Yet Alfredo Rodriguez is Motivated To Shock Jerwin Ancajas Carlos Takam vs. Marcin Rekowski For Vacant IBF International Belt Hearn: Khan's Financial Demand For Brook Was Borderline Insult Photos: Linares, Crolla - Go Face To Face at Rematch Presser Carlos Cuadras vs. David Carmona Added To Golovkin-Jacobs Joshua: Klitschko is My Defining Fight, Could Boost Credibility Lamont Peterson, David Avanesyan Promise Fireworks on Feb. 18 DeGale's Trainer Reveals Mayweather Antics From Jack Fight Showtime to Air Linares-Crolla Rematch March 25 From Manchester Frampton Doesn't Believe Santa Cruz Will Try to Box in Rematch Froch: Chavez Jr. is Good Fight For Canelo To Prepare For Golovkin Thurman Trainer: Keith is Faster, Stronger, Smarter Than Garcia Bellew: Haye Has No Real Friends After Booting Adam Booth Gilberto Ramirez Wants The Biggest Fights Possible in 2017 Dale Evans: When I Get My Shot, I’ll Win British Title For Mike Towell Jake Ball To Return, After First Loss, On March 17 Hearn: ITV PPV Idea is Likely Delusion and Greed From Eubank Sr. Conwell: I've Boxed In Higher Class Than Bowen, Will Win That Title Saunders: People Must Realize - GGG, Canelo Must Get Through Me World Boxing Council Breaks Down Ongoing Drug Testing Program Black Hitler - Boxing And The Anti-PBC Effect Danny Garcia: I'm Sure I'll Fight Khan - Once He Rebuilds Career Schaefer: Tony Yoka Could Become The Anthony Joshua of France Terry Flanagan vs. Petr Petrov Will Have U.S. TV, Says Pelullo White: I Won't Do Business With Arum For Pacquiao vs. McGregor! Erick De Leon Aims To Get a Knockout Win on Solo Boxeo Tony Yoka Pumped To Go Pro With Richard Schaefer, Virgil Hunter Francisco Vargas vs. Miguel Berchelt - Undercard Information Tyron Zeuge vs. Isaac Ekpo - Purse Bid Ordered For January 31 David Haye: Bellew Looked Fat and Nervous - He'll Be KO'd Quick Funeka Warns Pacquiao To Take Horn Serious or Suffer Shock Loss Braekhus vs. Svensson is Pushed Back To February 24 Liam Williams vs. Liam Smith For WBO European Belt, April 8 Photos: Fury, Saunders, Adams, Smith-Williams, Flanagan Presser
Advertisement
Latest Active Forum Threads
Advertisement
Advertisement