If Abel Sanchez is SO vigilant with % for Jacobs, then how was GBP wrong?!

**Citizen Koba** · 10-15-2016, 08:02 AM

Originally posted by SugarKaineHook

''Golovkin Doesn't Need Jacobs.'' -Dirty Sanchez

60/40 is what Abel & Loeffler wanted with Alvarez?! fugg outta here.

We even said before HERE, and NOW Abel is saying it: Alvarez vs Golovkin ''Trilogy.''

If that's the hope, then why not concede to GBP's INITIAL offer for such a venturous trilogy? Why not put it all on the line for the spotlight?

You can't have it both ways... for whatever reason Abel gives regarding the current Jacobs' fiasco then there's simply no way in hell can ANYBODY eat Abel's justifications as to why Alvarez's fight didn't happen in 2016 or whenever...

Lesson finished

As ever I'm struggling to understand what the **** you are saying even though we apparently speak the same language.

Is there some coherent argument in there that I'm missing or are you just pointing out that team GGG just want to get the best deal for their guy against Jacobs and Alvarez?

**Zaroku** · 10-15-2016, 08:11 AM

Great post player. Abel needs to consider that Canelo has a country behind him. I don't really like Canelo, but I wanna see dudes with skills throw down. Let the best man win.

It would be a great fight. Hope it happens soon.

**Lester Tutor** · 10-15-2016, 08:16 AM

Originally posted by Koba-Grozny

As ever I'm struggling to understand what the **** you are saying even though we apparently speak the same language.

Is there some coherent argument in there that I'm missing or are you just pointing out that team GGG just want to get the best deal for their guy against Jacobs and Alvarez?

here's your homework assignment:

first actually hear what Dirty Sanchez has to say about % as of LATE, and by LATE, means the merrier!

After you hear this, maybe you'll understand contradictions from Dirty Sanchez.

**Citizen Koba** · 10-15-2016, 08:20 AM

Originally posted by SugarKaineHook

here's your homework assignment:

first actually hear what Dirty Sanchez has to say about % as of LATE, and by LATE, means the merrier!

After you hear this, maybe you'll understand contradictions from Dirty Sanchez.

Ha ha ha . 45 minutes of Dontae? No thanks. How about you give me a summary? Though if you're trying to prove that Sanchez talks a lotta ****, you might as well save yourself the time. I already know.

**Lester Tutor** · 10-15-2016, 08:23 AM

Originally posted by Koba-Grozny

Ha ha ha . 45 minutes of Dontae? No thanks. How about you give me a summary?

I already did... reat the thread title. Abel Sanchez is the trainer of Golovkin btw.

but you can act like it's not a complete phone conversation between Abel and Dontae. Unless of course you think Abel is listening to Dontae for 45 minutes. There are interviews in boxing. In this interview Abel is actually talking through his cell phone. My laptop speakers can pick it up.

**OnePunch** · 10-15-2016, 08:28 AM

There are no guarantees in boxing, so why should someone in GGGs position bend over in negotiations?

Just ask Lennox how much money he made in the Tyson rematch. Oh, wait......

**Lester Tutor** · 10-15-2016, 08:32 AM

Originally posted by OnePunch

There are no guarantees in boxing...

lol? So you're saying Golovkin might not beat Alvarez?

Wait, why would Abel talk about a Trilogy? Or Abel waiting for GGG to hit 40, so he can say, ''he didn't want to fight us years ago...''

**Zaroku** · 10-15-2016, 08:41 AM

Originally posted by SugarKaineHook

here's your homework assignment:

first actually hear what Dirty Sanchez has to say about % as of LATE, and by LATE, means the merrier!

After you hear this, maybe you'll understand contradictions from Dirty Sanchez.

Look dog, Abel is the new Preddy Roach. **** makes me sick!

I'd beat him to death with my chorizo.

**Lester Tutor** · 10-15-2016, 08:50 AM

Originally posted by Zaroku

Look dog, Abel is the new Preddy Roach. **** makes me sick!

I'd beat him to death with my chorizo.

I made some dope Turkish chorizo this morning. We call it sucuk!

If Abel Sanchez is SO vigilant with % for Jacobs, then how was GBP wrong?!