How old is the human race?

[arraamis]

Originally Posted by Ta Khent

Evolution is the most plausible explanation thus far. The biblical view of creation is filled with so many holes that it does not warrant a logical discussion.

There are also huge gaping holes in the theory of evolution, that no one has successfully explained -- hence, the reason this theory has never been able to transition to the level of a scientifically proven explanation.

Fossils in Kenya Challenge Linear Evolution
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/09/sc...d&oref=slogin&

Compliments of the famous, and very well respected, Dr. Leakey

[Ta Khent]

Originally Posted by arraamis

You're somewhat to very confused, if you're referring to the LAW of Gravity.

Gravitation is a natural phenomenon by which physical bodies appear to attract each other with a force proportional to their masses.

Quite different from a theoretical hypothesis.

Yes, it explains the attraction, but it does not tell you why they attract each other. Einstein's Theory of General Relativity explains why.

[New England]

according to scholars, anatomically modern humans are 200k years old.

about 50k years ago we began to demonstrate what's known by scholars as "modern behavior." this includes the manipulation of our environment, simple tools, simple culture, etc.

the paintings at Lascaux weren't made by apes.

they are between 15000 and 20000 years old.


think fire, clothing, throwing spears instead of rocks, etc. they'd make sounds and noises that have shared meaning, they might worship simple gods or nature, they might sing, they probably laughed, they were human.


yall need to go back to school and PAY ATTENTION

the stuff you hear on this website is unreal.

[New England]

this is a clovis spearhead.



they're 10-15 K years old. this is prehistoric technology. the people who made these spears are our ancestors. they weren't apes.

if you banged a clovis ***** you could get her pregnant.

[leff]

Originally Posted by Joeyzagz

If humans are apes why cant our women carry any of their babies?

Even Tigers and Lions can cross breed but not humans and apes. Totally different.

depends on how different/close we are.

say horse and donkey can breed a mule.

but the mule cant rebreed, hence horse and donkey aint the same specie.

[arraamis]

Originally Posted by Ta Khent

Yes, it explains the attraction, but it does not tell you why they attract each other. Einstein's Theory of General Relativity explains why.

You're missing the point and the proven difference between the two ...

Evolution is a hypothetical theory, to date no indisputable evidence can be presented that would withstand scientific\Archeological scrutiny. In fact, to the contrary, there is more than sufficient Archeological evidence to disprove the theory completely.

When considering Gravity, there are two components involved, one is the law of gravity, which is demonstrated using an indisputable formula for calculating reactions, and then there is the theoretical portion that is tied to the hypothesis of why these reactions occur. How gravitational forces are generated involves understanding the earth's relationship to the sun and how those forces generated by the sun maintain distance and revolutions without degradation. And scientifically, we do not have sufficient knowledge of, and understanding about the universe to explain why.

The point I'm making is that once science gains a greater understanding of universal magnetic forces, then the theoretical equation tied to the Law of gravity can be resolved\solved.

- The Law of gravity's theoretical portion is due to lack of understanding.

- Evolution's theoretical hypothesis is due to lack of evidence.

That is the difference between the two .....

[arraamis]

Originally Posted by New England

this is a clovis spearhead.



they're 10-15 K years old. this is prehistoric technology. the people who made these spears are our ancestors. they weren't apes.

if you banged a clovis ***** you could get her pregnant.

Sometimes you have to reduce truth to such a level for some to finally understand.

[-Lowkey-]

"Evolution as a process that has gone on in the history of earth can be doubted only by those who are ignorant of the evidence or are resistant to evidence, owing to emotional blocks or to plain bigotry" Stephen J Gould

[arraamis]

Originally Posted by -Lowkey-

"Evolution as a process that has gone on in the history of earth can be doubted only by those who are ignorant of the evidence or are resistant to evidence, owing to emotional blocks or to plain bigotry" Stephen J Gould

Your offering would be valid, if and only if Mr. Dawkins and Mr. Gould were NEVER wrong -- and that isn't the case.

If I had a choice between cartoon drawings and graphs coupled with a speech, and concrete indisputable evidence presented by numerous world renowned Archaeologist. Archaeology wins hands down!!!!!

I'll resubmit this ..... in case some hardcore evolutionists missed it.

Fossils in Kenya Challenge Linear Evolution
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/09/sc...d&oref=slogin&

Compliments of the famous, and very well respected, Dr. Leakey

[arraamis]

Archeological Finds Debunk Darwinism
http://www.henrymakow.com/forbidden_archeology.html

New evolutionary research disproves living missing link theories
http://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogsp...l#.UM4uxKN4-nI

Forbidden Archeology Disproves Evolution.
http://dawkinswatch.wordpress.com/20...ves-evolution/