Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex_Hayden
If you can't answer this question than it's proof you're just a casual boxing fan.
OR...in the immortal words of Roger Mayweather, you simply just don't know **** about boxing 
|
Thanks, bro. I thought you were talking sh*t, but I see you were directing the comment at the dude, Brother Jay, who posed that question. Like you said, if you are a boxing fan, you know about how belts are handed out like welfare checks. Therefore, not all champions are the best. I am directing these comments at Brother Jay. You think Cotto at 154 was the best. Cotto's 154 title was a joke, he beat Yuri Foreman...Yuri Foreman. Talk about handing Cotto a title. Just because you are a champion does not make you the best. Floyd deceives people by fighting champions, but refuses to fight the best. There is a clear distinction. I am not saying the best aren't champions, but not all champions are the best. A Cotto who got raped and sodomized by Margarito & Pacquiao might be a champion, but he is not the best. He is what you call "sloppy seconds," aka "leftovers," etc. How are you gonna legitimize a fight where one dude has been raped and sodomized not once, but twice. How can you even sell that fight? Well, where there's a will there's a way. Even after getting his sh*t pushed in twice, Cotto still takes Mayweather 12 rounds. It's a laugher.