Bookmark Website  | Free Registration  | The Team
Boxing Champions |  Boxing Schedule |  Boxing Video  |  Boxing History   |  Pound For Pound  | Lounge  | The Wire |  Audio  | Arcade

Navigation
Go Back   Boxing Forum > Boxing Forums > Non Stop Boxing
Reply
Thread Navigation

#31
Old 12-04-2012, 10:05 PM
The Gambler1981
Undisputed Champion
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Detroit
Age: 33
Posts: 20,033
Rep Power: 52 The Gambler1981 has a reputation beyond reputeThe Gambler1981 has a reputation beyond reputeThe Gambler1981 has a reputation beyond reputeThe Gambler1981 has a reputation beyond reputeThe Gambler1981 has a reputation beyond reputeThe Gambler1981 has a reputation beyond reputeThe Gambler1981 has a reputation beyond reputeThe Gambler1981 has a reputation beyond reputeThe Gambler1981 has a reputation beyond reputeThe Gambler1981 has a reputation beyond reputeThe Gambler1981 has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 10,600,115,252.71
Bank: 3,283,106,636,900.45
Total Points: 3,293,706,752,153.16
respect. - mellow_mood you deserve a metal for defending the woman beater, lol, nyahahaha - Tha_Greatest always a good poster. have a beer. - jreckoning \m/ - Kenny MF Powers thanks brother - mrpain81 
great easy logical advice you gave for others on the thunderdome for trolls like me, lol, everything you stated i have stated to many people but few people would take mind of what you wrote, lol, excellent post, plain  logic to keep your composure fo - Tha_Greatest No Message - mathed thatll be 5$ - sugarsmosley 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by New England View Post
i think a great fighter who sticks around for long enough will eventually be tested. if there are other great fighters at the weight class they will test him in his prime. it's rare to see great fighters at the same weight class in the prime of their careers. if he's really so good that he can't he touched, or there are no other great fighters around, he has to slow down. once he slows, a great fighter will usually find other means of getting to the victory.


greatness is based on accomplishments. there are "types" of great careers and accomplishment. some guys do so much in their primes that they're considered greats based on their work there. others have gone to the well after their primes, and pulled out fights against younger fighters to enhance their resume.


theoretically, a fighter could be so good that he'd never be challenged. if roy jones were to retire after beating john ruiz he would have been a hall of famer. late period wladimir klitchko may never see a hard fight. when he faced adversity early in his career against purrity, sanders, and brewster, he lost. but after he hit his stride he put together a streak that will probably put him in the top 15 of most people's all time list at HW.
Pretty much, there are many ways to the top and you have to keep an open mind about it.

It is the old Sandy Koufax or Nolan Ryan who is better debate, do you want a guy who was untouchable for a short period or do you want a guy who was always very good over decades. In boxing there are even more iterations of possible paths, does a guy dominate one class or does a guy do a bit in several, does a guy start out not very good but turns into an outstanding fighter, does a guy start out like a house on fire then fades quickly and that is just scratching the surface.
Reply With Quote
The Gambler1981 is online now
Advertisements
>>>TO REMOVE THESE ADS, PLEASE REGISTER HERE FOR FREE<<<
#32
Old 12-04-2012, 10:23 PM
- Ram Raid -
Capricorn # 1
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Snouting for Truffles.
Posts: 1,074
Blog Entries: 3
Rep Power: 6 - Ram Raid - has a reputation beyond repute- Ram Raid - has a reputation beyond repute- Ram Raid - has a reputation beyond repute- Ram Raid - has a reputation beyond repute- Ram Raid - has a reputation beyond repute- Ram Raid - has a reputation beyond repute- Ram Raid - has a reputation beyond repute- Ram Raid - has a reputation beyond repute- Ram Raid - has a reputation beyond repute- Ram Raid - has a reputation beyond repute- Ram Raid - has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 15,004,997,467.61
Bank: 39,209,189,760.63
Total Points: 54,214,187,228.24
here is a well deserved banana for one of your morning smoothies - jas for following an epic diet - jas Nutrition Specialist - jas 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BoxingGenius27 View Post
It seems in order to be considered the greatest of all time or one of the greats, you have to either have wars, go life and death with various opponents or at least lose a few times throughout your career.

Without getting too specific and naming names, rarely do you see someone dominate several divisions over an extended period of time and get credit for it. Normally, (insert fighter) list of opponents somehow get discredited along the way.

So the main point/concern at hand is should we advise this new generation not to win to convincingly, but in turn try to have at least 2-3 "wars" with a top ranked opponent and look like they're struggling so their legacy can go down in history as one of the greats?

Feel free to discuss.
In order for many fans to consider a boxer to be one of the greats, their fights (or elements of their careers) have to bring excitement and have a narrative that they readily identify with. For instance, if a Cotto beats a Margarito then it reinforces the idea that in life, there's a possibility of redemption. If Foreman knocks out Moorer then there's hope against the inevitable infirmity of old age. We become emotionally attached to fighters and fights that represent something that is more than mere boxing; an idea that we hold dear. These fights and fighters (and the meanings we attach to them) resonate with us so we're more likely to consider them for greatness even in the absence of great skills.

What rarely resonates with many, and what is difficult to identify with, is when a fighter is so technically proficient that any excitement, drama or tension normally inherent in fighting is superseded by boredom, domination and even ridicule. The wider notions attached to such bouts are read as oppressive rather than uplifting. In the absence of even contests we are left instead with cruel but never the less technically brilliant one-sided performances. But as a significant portion of fans don't watch the sport primarily for it's technical aspects, then watching a Mayweather Vs Marquez/Mosley for example becomes an unsettling experience.

For those fans, the absence of a contest in which both fighters are tested is a straight up con. So it isn't a question of a fighter making it look like they're struggling so they can win those fans around because that would be seen as a deception to cover a deception. Rather, what they have to do is engage with fighters that are capable of testing them to bring the drama and meaning that those fans desire.
Reply With Quote
- Ram Raid - is offline
#33
Old 12-04-2012, 11:19 PM
IMDAZED
You'll resort to race
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Zamunda
Posts: 31,536
Rep Power: 88 IMDAZED has a reputation beyond reputeIMDAZED has a reputation beyond reputeIMDAZED has a reputation beyond reputeIMDAZED has a reputation beyond reputeIMDAZED has a reputation beyond reputeIMDAZED has a reputation beyond reputeIMDAZED has a reputation beyond reputeIMDAZED has a reputation beyond reputeIMDAZED has a reputation beyond reputeIMDAZED has a reputation beyond reputeIMDAZED has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 2,003,165,487,697.97
Bank: 102,066,128,266,571.95
Total Points: 104,069,293,754,269.94
for knowing your stuff! - natas206 thanks for the info. - TRUTH For that homerun of a post, bud. - Sweet Pea 50 An apple for one of BoxingScene's most knowledgeable posters - danc1984 BOOM - Fiend 
Excellent poster - ADDICT MOH. For continously educating NSB. - BattlingNelson been a while mate! - Tamis_Siensya No Message - WESS 
Default

Being in a war and being faced with adversity are two different things. Guys like Pernell Whitaker and Roy Jones were never really in any wars during their prime but faced adversity multiple times. What you're really getting at is an issue that has more to do with a fighter's style. Reminds me of a 2003 Ring mag article where the writer noted that, following his win over Ruiz, a reporter asked Jones, "Did you think it was going to be this easy?" To which Jones replied with, "It wasn't easy at all."
Reply With Quote
IMDAZED is offline
#34
Old 12-04-2012, 11:26 PM
The Gambler1981
Undisputed Champion
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Detroit
Age: 33
Posts: 20,033
Rep Power: 52 The Gambler1981 has a reputation beyond reputeThe Gambler1981 has a reputation beyond reputeThe Gambler1981 has a reputation beyond reputeThe Gambler1981 has a reputation beyond reputeThe Gambler1981 has a reputation beyond reputeThe Gambler1981 has a reputation beyond reputeThe Gambler1981 has a reputation beyond reputeThe Gambler1981 has a reputation beyond reputeThe Gambler1981 has a reputation beyond reputeThe Gambler1981 has a reputation beyond reputeThe Gambler1981 has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 10,600,115,252.71
Bank: 3,283,106,636,900.45
Total Points: 3,293,706,752,153.16
respect. - mellow_mood you deserve a metal for defending the woman beater, lol, nyahahaha - Tha_Greatest always a good poster. have a beer. - jreckoning \m/ - Kenny MF Powers thanks brother - mrpain81 
great easy logical advice you gave for others on the thunderdome for trolls like me, lol, everything you stated i have stated to many people but few people would take mind of what you wrote, lol, excellent post, plain  logic to keep your composure fo - Tha_Greatest No Message - mathed thatll be 5$ - sugarsmosley 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IMDAZED View Post
Being in a war and being faced with adversity are two different things. Guys like Pernell Whitaker and Roy Jones were never really in any wars during their prime but faced adversity multiple times. What you're really getting at is an issue that has more to do with a fighter's style. Reminds me of a 2003 Ring mag article where the writer noted that, following his win over Ruiz, a reporter asked Jones, "Did you think it was going to be this easy?" To which Jones replied with, "It wasn't easy at all."
Indeed, looking easy and being easy are two totally different things. Also that doesn't even take into account preparation which is a huge part of success but very few even get to see and to be properly prepared for a fight takes a ton of very hard work.
Reply With Quote
The Gambler1981 is online now
#35
Old 12-04-2012, 11:45 PM
IMDAZED
You'll resort to race
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Zamunda
Posts: 31,536
Rep Power: 88 IMDAZED has a reputation beyond reputeIMDAZED has a reputation beyond reputeIMDAZED has a reputation beyond reputeIMDAZED has a reputation beyond reputeIMDAZED has a reputation beyond reputeIMDAZED has a reputation beyond reputeIMDAZED has a reputation beyond reputeIMDAZED has a reputation beyond reputeIMDAZED has a reputation beyond reputeIMDAZED has a reputation beyond reputeIMDAZED has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 2,003,165,487,697.97
Bank: 102,066,128,266,571.95
Total Points: 104,069,293,754,269.94
for knowing your stuff! - natas206 thanks for the info. - TRUTH For that homerun of a post, bud. - Sweet Pea 50 An apple for one of BoxingScene's most knowledgeable posters - danc1984 BOOM - Fiend 
Excellent poster - ADDICT MOH. For continously educating NSB. - BattlingNelson been a while mate! - Tamis_Siensya No Message - WESS 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Gambler1981 View Post
Indeed, looking easy and being easy are two totally different things. Also that doesn't even take into account preparation which is a huge part of success but very few even get to see and to be properly prepared for a fight takes a ton of very hard work.
Exactly. And I think that's what Jones was getting at. Making it look easy in boxing is frowned upon, usually because the fighters who do that tend to be the most arrogant. Can you blame them? But personalities aside, you find that in any field of employment. I don't agree with the notion that you penalize the student who maximizes his potential by pairing God-given talent with incredible work ethic, and thus performs better when tested. As opposed to the others who can't quite match them in one of those two departments. It's a phenomena that's applauded daily in classrooms everywhere.
Reply With Quote
IMDAZED is offline
#36
Old 12-05-2012, 12:32 AM
EDD1
Interim Champion
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: CALIFORNIA
Posts: 697
Rep Power: 8 EDD1 has a reputation beyond reputeEDD1 has a reputation beyond reputeEDD1 has a reputation beyond reputeEDD1 has a reputation beyond reputeEDD1 has a reputation beyond reputeEDD1 has a reputation beyond reputeEDD1 has a reputation beyond reputeEDD1 has a reputation beyond reputeEDD1 has a reputation beyond reputeEDD1 has a reputation beyond reputeEDD1 has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 14,091.45
Bank: 17,358,337.28
Total Points: 17,372,428.73
Default

Made me think of Roy Jones Jr.... after his fight at HW which he made look easy, I felt like no one will ever top him and still believe he is the greatest i ever saw...
Reply With Quote
EDD1 is offline
#37
Old 12-05-2012, 12:46 AM
pacmanis1
Interim Champion
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 924
Rep Power: 8 pacmanis1 has a reputation beyond reputepacmanis1 has a reputation beyond reputepacmanis1 has a reputation beyond reputepacmanis1 has a reputation beyond reputepacmanis1 has a reputation beyond reputepacmanis1 has a reputation beyond reputepacmanis1 has a reputation beyond reputepacmanis1 has a reputation beyond reputepacmanis1 has a reputation beyond reputepacmanis1 has a reputation beyond reputepacmanis1 has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 1,000,050,509.30
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 1,000,050,509.30
Thanks for joining the discussion in my thread about GF's and boxing, its nice to hear everyones experiences with being a fan of the sport!!! - Atreyu Khalil No Message - sugarsmosley 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BoxingGenius27 View Post
It seems in order to be considered the greatest of all time or one of the greats, you have to either have wars, go life and death with various opponents or at least lose a few times throughout your career.

Without getting too specific and naming names, rarely do you see someone dominate several divisions over an extended period of time and get credit for it. Normally, (insert fighter) list of opponents somehow get discredited along the way.

So the main point/concern at hand is should we advise this new generation not to win to convincingly, but in turn try to have at least 2-3 "wars" with a top ranked opponent and look like they're struggling so their legacy can go down in history as one of the greats?

Feel free to discuss.
Simple answer no. I do think though that it is inevitable to face adversity. I think a prime example is the Klitschkos. They seem to win with ease but are fighting anybody available. I'm not fan of them and will admit they're in a crappy era, but I truly believe in 10 years we'll all like them a lot more.

But for the record for some reason I got a Mayweather-esque feeling from your post and while I love and respect Money, you do have to fight everyone to run into adversity. He's fought four times in the last five years, and while I can defend every fight, it's not the kind of stuff of legends.
Reply With Quote
pacmanis1 is offline
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
adversity?, face, fighters, greatest, order, time

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Privacy Policy - Submit News - Feedback - Site Map - Advertise with Us

Copyright 2003-2013 BoxingScene LLC All rights reserved.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:02 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.