|11-23-2012, 02:59 PM||#11|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Newcastle, UK
Quoted: 0 Post(s)Rep Power: 6
Total Points: 10,005,540,421.25
When the winner is announced on the scorecards in an elite fight with 'And the new!', but still you have to think about who the champ is/was, its an issue.
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
|11-23-2012, 04:38 PM||#12|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Quoted: 1 Post(s)Rep Power: 294
Total Points: 2,937,364,149,785,751.50
Absolutely not, there are already too many. I wouldn't mind them replacing one of the other alphabet organizations though, as all of them are more corrupt.
|11-23-2012, 06:54 PM||#13|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Quoted: 1 Post(s)Rep Power: 0
Total Points: 50,023,678.81
should be considered the Irrelevant Boxing Organisation.
Since amalgamations are unlikely to happen, a pyramid of titles might solve some issues, with minor/irrelevant IBA, WBF, IBO and others at the bottom ,intermediate/major WBO and IBF on the next level and major/oldest WBA or WBC at the top. Or some arrangement like that.
The we'd know who was the real King, and who was knocking on the door.
Last edited by DreamFighter; 11-23-2012 at 07:01 PM.
|11-23-2012, 07:01 PM||#14|
El Weeblerito I
Join Date: Dec 2007
Quoted: 972 Post(s)Rep Power: 92
Total Points: 120,053,796,024,843,728.00
4 recognised world title belts per division is enough.
Actually 3 would make more sense, you could probably legitimately have 3 fighters per division worthy of world title status.
|Share This With Friends|
|considered, major, title?|