Who is the best British fighter right now? - Page 2

D-MiZe

Not really worthy of a thread as it's obvious as to who the best British fighter is at the moment. I'm adamant you've made a couple of threads like this before too and one recently...

Would've been better if the thread was about who could potentially be the best British fighter at some point.

-Lowkey-

Once again freedom makes a poll and the only person to oppose the obvious is himself.

If that's not a sign of a poor poster I don't know what is.

-Lowkey-

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freedom.

Am I a poor poster, or am I just someone who doesn't jump on bandwagons?

Your agenda is transparent, your hate for Froch is transparent.

There is no logical reason for picking Burns over Froch, there is no logical reason for you picking Bute to beat Froch in a rematch.

NEETzsche

froch, by a country mile.

yoz

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freedom.

I'd say Ricky Burns, a two-division titleholder.

George Groves, Nathan Cleverly and David Price have a lot of potential.

Carl Froch and David Haye are good but overrated.

Several like Cleverly, Price and Kell Brook need to step up their level of competition.

David Price, at present, is ridiculously overrated. I like the guy, but he hasn't fought anyone of note - questions re. his chin, too.

Cleverly is overrated. Probably one of the weakest title holders at present.

In reply to your question: Froch, without doubt. There's no way Burns ranks higher than Froch.

Freedom.

Quote:

Originally Posted by -Lowkey-

Your agenda is transparent, your hate for Froch is transparent.

There is no logical reason for picking Burns over Froch, there is no logical reason for you picking Bute to beat Froch in a rematch.

I do have a logical reason.

My logical reason is: I'll be amused when I read the VERY SERIOUS reaction I get from people like you. Isn't it logical to enjoy a good laugh once in a while?

I don't hate Froch, although I do think he's being a bit overrated right now.

yoz

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freedom.

I do have a logical reason.

My logical reason is: I'll be amused when I read the VERY SERIOUS reaction I get from people like you. Isn't it logical to enjoy a good laugh once in a while?

I don't hate Froch, although I do think he's being a bit overrated right now.

Froch is also on PEDs, isn't he?

K.Webster

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freedom.

I'd say Ricky Burns, a two-division titleholder.

George Groves, Nathan Cleverly and David Price have a lot of potential.

Carl Froch and David Haye are good but overrated.

Several like Cleverly, Price and Kell Brook need to step up their level of competition.

You used to love Carl Froch until he took a dump on your fellow countryman Lucian Bute.

RichCCFC

Kell Brook but Froch on merit now has higher prestige

rampant

Easily Froch then Burns.

Is Haye an active boxer? Personally I dont think Haye should be in any rankings, I also dont think Mayweather should be part of any rankings.

Rankings should be for boxer who are active and fighting regularly, not once a year or once every 2 years.

View Poll Results: Who do you consider to be the best active British boxer?
Kell Brook	2	1.82%
George Groves	1	0.91%
Ricky Burns	1	0.91%
David Haye	8	7.27%
Nathan Cleverly	0	0%
Carl Froch	92	83.64%
Tony Bellew	1	0.91%
Amir Khan	0	0%
David Price	3	2.73%
Ricky Hatton	2	1.82%
Voters: 110. You may not vote on this poll

D-MiZe Iron lungs Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: England Posts: 28,781 Blog Entries: 7 Rep Power: 86 Points: 2,007,496,919,519.37 Bank: 932,846,550,282.79 Total Points: 2,940,343,469,802.16 Donate	Not really worthy of a thread as it's obvious as to who the best British fighter is at the moment. I'm adamant you've made a couple of threads like this before too and one recently... Would've been better if the thread was about who could potentially be the best British fighter at some point.

-Lowkey- Winter is coming Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 3,723 Rep Power: 12 Points: 107,062,900.52 Bank: 24,502,423,394.73 Total Points: 24,609,486,295.25 Donate	Once again freedom makes a poll and the only person to oppose the obvious is himself. If that's not a sign of a poor poster I don't know what is.

NEETzsche Banned Join Date: Oct 2011 Age: 13 Posts: 964 Rep Power: 0 Points: 5,526,912.23 Bank: 0.00 Total Points: 5,526,912.23 Donate	froch, by a country mile.

RichCCFC 46-0 Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Wales Posts: 11,652 Rep Power: 33 Points: 6,000,249,946.15 Bank: 613,603,678,515.25 Total Points: 619,603,928,461.40 Donate	Kell Brook but Froch on merit now has higher prestige

rampant Contender Join Date: Oct 2011 Posts: 408 Rep Power: 4 Points: 1,610,012,497.13 Bank: 0.00 Total Points: 1,610,012,497.13 Donate	Easily Froch then Burns. Is Haye an active boxer? Personally I dont think Haye should be in any rankings, I also dont think Mayweather should be part of any rankings. Rankings should be for boxer who are active and fighting regularly, not once a year or once every 2 years.