|10-06-2012, 11:56 AM||#21|
SPEED IS POWER
Join Date: Sep 2010
Quoted: 0 Post(s)Rep Power: 56
Total Points: 27,759,942,094,549.20
Because Cotto, while competitive, lost the fight clearly and never hurt Floyd. In fact he's the one who got hurt in the end.
Martinez was dropped and badly hurt and it really looked like Chavez Jr was a few punches away from ending it.
|10-06-2012, 12:33 PM||#22|
RedKmakes U happy lol
Join Date: Mar 2010
Quoted: 0 Post(s)Rep Power: 0
Total Points: 2,612,038,777,148.33
I guess when I posted the question I would get a perspective I didnt think of but it seems my opening statement was reiterated in different words by most.
Were the fights blow outs?- Yes (Martinez/Chavez more)
Will both rematches sell to casual fans and hardcore?-Yes ( Casual more)
Will alot of money be made by all 4 fighters?- Hell yes! (which fight more?-debatable but I believe Floyd and Miguel)
Either they both are justified or both not, to me its Hypocritical to think one is and the other not.(So kudos to those who said neither or both)
It seems to me that the Knockdown was more important than both fights...lol (for the casual and hardcore fan)
No one ever said a bloody nose made the fight close or even a win for Cotto...SMH (for a casual fan-maybe)
|Share This With Friends|
|chávez, cotto, justified, martinez, mayweather, not?|