Thomas Hauser's perspective on Pacquiao-Bradley - Page 4

Danny Gunz

Quote:

Originally Posted by Legendary Hater

I see people are talking about Hauser's latest article...in which he basically states what a few of us knew yeeaaars ago...

Tards saying he's the best now...lol

How do you feel about this then?

Right there, wrong here?....vice versa?

Gonna duck again?

Here...suck on this

during your busted nervous fit...it'll help calm you down.

Regards,
SKULLSPLITTER - The CEO, Absolute Conqueror and Owner of the garbage fans

So you believe all of Hauser's theories on GBP, PEDs, and Floyd?

TOBYLEE1

IMO this was a clear win for Pac I had it 8 to 4 and a swing round in there. Pac landed the clear big shots. Bradley gave a great account of himself but I didn't think that he pulled it off.

ИATAS

don't think it means much. I doubt there is a single person in the world I'll agree with 100% of the time when it comes to scoring a fight.

Pacdbest

Bradley lost!! That's why he's not fighting & No opponent on schedule! He's too boring Pac was not interested in a rematch!

99% of the people who watched it gave it to Pac by landslide! Hauser was just the 1%.

SoggyLungs · 03:40 PM

judging fights is a matter of opinion...just because he thinks the bradley decision is fair doesn't mean that the majority of boxing analysts who scored it for pac are all wrong and should be discredited because of one guys opinion. this is different from him mentioning how floyd supposedly failed 3 drug tests..

TOBYLEE1 Undisputed Champion Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: NYC Posts: 3,691 Rep Power: 14 Points: 62,635.20 Bank: 0.00 Total Points: 62,635.20 Donate	IMO this was a clear win for Pac I had it 8 to 4 and a swing round in there. Pac landed the clear big shots. Bradley gave a great account of himself but I didn't think that he pulled it off.

ИATAS Legend Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Seattle Age: 99 Posts: 28,182 Rep Power: 115 Points: 129,818,474,283.37 Bank: 11,766,194,934,336.41 Total Points: 11,896,013,408,619.78 Donate	don't think it means much. I doubt there is a single person in the world I'll agree with 100% of the time when it comes to scoring a fight.

Pacdbest Undisputed Champion Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 4,228 Rep Power: 14 Points: 32,000,253,906.48 Bank: 0.00 Total Points: 32,000,253,906.48 Donate	Bradley lost!! That's why he's not fighting & No opponent on schedule! He's too boring Pac was not interested in a rematch! 99% of the people who watched it gave it to Pac by landslide! Hauser was just the 1%.

SoggyLungs Faceless Man Join Date: Jun 2011 Posts: 5,163 Rep Power: 13 Points: 100,061,433.73 Bank: 0.00 Total Points: 100,061,433.73 Donate	judging fights is a matter of opinion...just because he thinks the bradley decision is fair doesn't mean that the majority of boxing analysts who scored it for pac are all wrong and should be discredited because of one guys opinion. this is different from him mentioning how floyd supposedly failed 3 drug tests.. Last edited by SoggyLungs; 11-19-2012 at 03:40 PM.