Duane Ford on Fight Game

Stromprophet

So.....

His reasoning was a) He penalized Manny because he didn't close Bradley out.

I've never once in my life heard that as a criteria for scoring rounds.

And b) Bradley was landing body shots in the second half of the fight.....yeah, at the pace of a few a round.

How can (2) of those judges tremendously experienced get the scores so wrong? Smells to high heaven.

Leaving aside all other things.

1) Bradley had no effective counter punching, nothing like what JMM did against Manny. So, no points on that.
2) Bradley has no power. Anyone disagree there? He has very few KOs in his career. He can't close. Who really believes he was landing the harder punches?
3) Ring Aggression? Again, anyone think Bradley was the aggressor?
4) Landed punches
5) Harder punches

They were both missing a lot. I think all else being equal. Manny hurt Bradley twice, two separate rounds, landed more punches, and harder punches.
_________________

Last month. We saw an exciting Cotto fight. Mayweather outlanded by similar amounts to this fight, but Cotto landed some good rounds and good shots. Mayweather had Cotto hurt in the last round.

It was a blow out Mayweather. I thought this was just as obvious for Manny.

Every scorer that we have seen, ex-boxer, current boxer, the AP, etc had Manny. The same people who had JMM slightly in the last fight (the correct call).

Wow to ridiculousness. Vegas is a tomb.

mushahadeen

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stromprophet

His reasoning was a) He penalized Manny because he didn't close Bradley out.

I've never once in my life heard that as a criteria for scoring rounds.

Duane Ford is a delusional psychopath. He is the Poster Child for Alzeimers and Adult Diapers.

Those three stooges were also in part responsible for Rios vs. Abril. Not to mention in teaching other judges Duane Ford has contaminated all of judging.

Lineal Champ

Pacquiao a victim of his own success.

CHOWWOKKA

And new.........

Big_L

i think you misinterpreted what he was trying to say. he was just making an observation that the old manny would have finished him. not implying that he punished him the rest of the fight because he didn't.

AndNewChampion

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big_L

i think you misinterpreted what he was trying to say. he was just making an observation that the old manny would have finished him. not implying that he punished him the rest of the fight because he didn't.

The more I see or hear judges talk, the more I lose faith, much like in some ref's. Joe Cortez may have bene great, but in his old age he has slipped. I can only say that is the case for judges. For example one judge got Khan Peter wrong where Khan was deducted. If that mistake happened who is to say it doesn't happen on close rounds where mistakes are made but you will never know.

115-113 maybe have been equal scores, but even then the judges had different rounds to different fighters. There isn't a consistency.

crazed_z06

I said the same thing to my friend. That comment from Ford made me think he was penalizing Pac for not being old Pac.

Roy Hobbs

you cant score pitty pat pawing punches that have absolutely no effect on the opponent. 70 year olds should not be judging any kind of sports anyway. The most i could give bradley is 4 rounds.

mozzer101

This guy is crazy. He also judged PAC on the way he fought on previous fights instead of that night. It doesn't matter how the old PAC looked. That's the past. Judge him on that night and that night only.

mushahadeen

Quote:

Originally Posted by mozzer101

This guy is crazy. He also judged PAC on the way he fought on previous fights instead of that night. It doesn't matter how the old PAC looked. That's the past. Judge him on that night and that night only.

You're being too logical.

In Duane Ford's mind there are giant bunnies and talking elves and rainbow fishes flying around and sh1t.

The guy is clearly a delusional psychopath.

Lineal Champ Interim Champion Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 637 Rep Power: 5 Points: 83,901.88 Bank: 0.00 Total Points: 83,901.88 Donate	Pacquiao a victim of his own success.

CHOWWOKKA lats of peace Join Date: Oct 2011 Posts: 5,443 Rep Power: 24 Points: 615,651,199,886.07 Bank: 196,550,024,629.43 Total Points: 812,201,224,515.50 Donate	And new.........

Big_L Undisputed Champion Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 1,133 Rep Power: 14 Points: 101,000,078,565.03 Bank: 0.00 Total Points: 101,000,078,565.03 Donate	i think you misinterpreted what he was trying to say. he was just making an observation that the old manny would have finished him. not implying that he punished him the rest of the fight because he didn't.

crazed_z06 Contender Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 111 Rep Power: 4 Points: 5,529.59 Bank: 0.00 Total Points: 5,529.59 Donate	I said the same thing to my friend. That comment from Ford made me think he was penalizing Pac for not being old Pac.

Roy Hobbs ~The Natural~ Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 560 Rep Power: 5 Points: 34,792.71 Bank: 139,490.57 Total Points: 174,283.28 Donate	you cant score pitty pat pawing punches that have absolutely no effect on the opponent. 70 year olds should not be judging any kind of sports anyway. The most i could give bradley is 4 rounds.

mozzer101 Contender Join Date: May 2009 Location: Sylmar, CA Posts: 302 Rep Power: 5 Points: 55,802.52 Bank: 0.00 Total Points: 55,802.52 Donate	This guy is crazy. He also judged PAC on the way he fought on previous fights instead of that night. It doesn't matter how the old PAC looked. That's the past. Judge him on that night and that night only.