Should boxing judges....

[~AK49~]

Be subject to a greater judging pannel? Idk, im not sure of the solution, but this almost seems like the best bet to help keep in check the 3 man wrecking crew. Or at the very least make it alot more expensive to pay them off, to the point that its almost not even worth it.

The judging pannel would consist of 100-250 people, both judges and sports writers. Maybe set it up to where if 75 percent of them say the other guy won, the decision is overturned. If 50 percent say he won, its a draw, etc. Something like that?

[PBP]

I don't think it will work. If a powerful promoter wants a certain fighter to win, he'll make it happen. They will find loopholes in any system.

[~AK49~]

Originally Posted by PBP

I don't think it will work. If a powerful promoter wants a certain fighter to win, he'll make it happen. They will find loopholes in any system.

Itd be alot harder (and way more expensive) to pay off so many people. Not saying it couldnt happen with the mega fights. But as it is, everywhere you look its *****ty judging. Rios-abril, lara-williams, etc. Those fights naturally dont produce much alot of money, so paying off a huge pannel would almost seem redundant.