True or False? Cotto is being written off for These Reasons:

[turbotime]

Originally Posted by Roman Moreno

No option C?

C) All of the above?

[Roman Moreno]

Originally Posted by turbotime

C) All of the above?

Sure why not.

[DeadLikeMe]

I was going to post something along these lines in that "NSB bubble" thread. 100% agree.

[Roman Moreno]

Originally Posted by DeadLikeMe

I was going to post something along these lines in that "NSB bubble" thread. 100% agree.

of course YOU do.

[turbotime]

Originally Posted by Roman Moreno

Sure why not.

I'm sorry

[noekin3]

How about a option that actually related to, i dont know, boxing?

[Dominicano Soy]

Originally Posted by turbotime

People are writing off Cotto for either reasons:

A) Because they don't like Mayweather and want to crap all over the fight
B) Because they don't like Cotto and are mad at what he did to Margarito

How about C ) because Mayweather is an all around better fighter?

[jose830]

Originally Posted by $ j-210 $

cotto didnt do anything to margo all he did was show up...all credit goes to pac and the ring doctor

Lol
Cotto destroyed his face...
for cheating and for his hair style...
Credit to PAC?
They both got beat by pac...
So if Cotto would of lost why would
I credit PAC?

[Roman Moreno]

Originally Posted by Dominicano Soy

How about C ) because Mayweather is an all around better fighter?

No according to a couple bias idiots on here that can't be it.

[El Angel]

Neither. Floyd in pretty much everyone eyes is the better fighter. That's why everyone is writing Cotto off.