|03-26-2012, 02:29 PM||#1|
Lords of Boxingscene
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Meet me at Vito's with Noodles
Quoted: 1958 Post(s)Rep Power: 359
Total Points: 20,000,000,000,000,001,811,939,328.00
Why is Floyd not mentioned when anyone talks about "out of prime boxers"
His prime days are over, he was the best at 130 and very strong at 135/140.
He is 35 four years older than Cotto and everyone talks about how Cotto is
out of his prime, but everyone thinks Mayweather is still in his prime and
When De La Hoya fought Mayweather, everyone said how DLH was over the hill (DLH was 34-35 at that time) and Mayweather was 30 at that time (Same age as Cotto). Makes no sense.*
what's your opinion?
|03-26-2012, 02:36 PM||#3|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Quoted: 0 Post(s)Rep Power: 0
Total Points: 657,062,597.65
Floyd been on vacation and is more fresher and has never really taken a beating whereas Cotto has been in wars with Margarito first fight and the Duckiao fight where he got banged.
|03-26-2012, 02:37 PM||#5|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hudson, Fl
Quoted: 1998 Post(s)Rep Power: 160
Total Points: 3,090,691,004,961,171.00
I think it goes without saying for the most part, just like Pacquiao. Their past prime abilities are still so good that it doesn't matter.
|03-26-2012, 03:17 PM||#6|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Quoted: 1 Post(s)Rep Power: 35
Total Points: 36,778,535,544.95
Guys age overnight and fans overreact. If Cotto wins, you will hear people talking about Floyd being past it.
De La Hoya was past it.
|03-26-2012, 03:22 PM||#7|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Quoted: 0 Post(s)Rep Power: 0
Total Points: 25,332,223.01
|03-26-2012, 03:22 PM||#8|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: a place where white women were scared when they saw me a black man wearing OJ style leather gloves!!
Quoted: 49 Post(s)Rep Power: 23
Total Points: 990,069,537,489.63
PBF is past his prime but his fights are won by such a wide margin there is no need to mention him being past his prime. Until a fighter starts to show a big drop off in ability with the things they used to do very well the talk of not being prime will not happen.
|03-26-2012, 03:23 PM||#9|
Nothing But Sunshine
Join Date: Jul 2011
Quoted: 636 Post(s)Rep Power: 51
Total Points: 1,000,200,106,251,990.38
I consider Floyd's prime to be 2000/2001-2007. From 2009-present day, he's been ast his prime-still good.
He's sort of like where Ray Leonard was in 87' or where Ali was in 72'-73'. He's past his prime, but he still has a couple years left of good fighting I think.
A big reason why he's not mentioned is because he's whupping good people at 34-35 years old today. What are his closest fights???
Castillo I: His closest, he arguably lost.
Castillo II: He won a clear UD, scores were closer than it should have been I thought. He won 8-4 in rounds to me.
Judah: He won a wide UD.
De La Hoya: He won a SD, but NO ONE thought that was really a SD. He won 8-3-1/9-3 to me and most everyone. Should have been a clear UD.
What else was close??? Since he returned from his layoff, he basically shut JMM out at a weight JMM just arguably beat Pac at. He beat Mosley 118-110/119-109. He was beating Ortiz 4-0/3-1 with relative ease. It's because he still looks dominant at his age.
Last edited by 4Corners; 03-26-2012 at 03:28 PM.
|03-26-2012, 03:27 PM||#10|
atheist with a gun
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: KirkjubŠjarklaustur, Iceland
Quoted: 114 Post(s)Rep Power: 180
Total Points: 310,084,274,566,668,224.00
Because what you have left isnt simply determinedd by your age. Its determined by what you actually have left
This is why erik Morales was considered shot at 28
|Share This With Friends|
|"out, boxers", floyd, mentioned, prime, talks|