Amir khan looks even worse now that maidana got dominated - Page 3

Walt Liquor

See bojanagles sig.

Khan was definitely overrated though. Devon came in with am efferective gameplan and stuck to it. Khan loses his wits and seems to shut down at least once a fight for a couple rounds.

Money_May

Styles make fights and triangle theories don't work. Khan beat kotelnik Devon struggled with him. Maidana beat Ortiz but lost to khan. Ortiz drew with Peterson but lamont beat khan. Don't mean *****. The only guy in that division who hasn't struggled is Bradley but he didn't fight khan which could have been his tough not to crack

Bushbaby

Quote:

Originally Posted by Walt Liquor

See bojanagles sig.

Khan was definitely overrated though. Devon came in with am efferective gameplan and stuck to it. Khan loses his wits and seems to shut down at least once a fight for a couple rounds.

Jangles was one a dem that severly overrated Khan. At 1 time he straight said Khan beats everyone at 140-147 not named Floyd or Manny, wow. He didn't even beat Lamont!!

Rome-By-Ko

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bushbaby

Jangles was one a dem that severly overrated Khan. At 1 time he straight said Khan beats everyone at 140-147 not named Floyd or Manny, wow. He didn't even beat Lamont!!

I was one of those guys as well(although I did say he would have hell with Peterson)but to be fair the Khan Peterson fight could have went either way...

Bushbaby

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rome-By-Ko

I was one of those guys as well(although I did say he would have hell with Peterson)but to be fair the Khan Peterson fight could have went either way...

The math doesn't add up then. Did you think that Khan beats Bradley?? Cause I never thought that. bradley would grind out a ruff win over Khan. Who would start quick then fall apart after 3.

Walt Liquor

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bushbaby

The math doesn't add up then. Did you think that Khan beats Bradley?? Cause I never thought that. bradley would grind out a ruff win over Khan. Who would start quick then fall apart after 3.

Thats pretty much how i see it. Id bet 1k on it.

Rome-By-Ko · 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bushbaby

The math doesn't add up then. Did you think that Khan beats Bradley?? Cause I never thought that. bradley would grind out a ruff win over Khan. Who would start quick then fall apart after 3.

Hell no,I've always thought Bradley beats Khan and so does Bo..

I did however think Khan would beat Ortiz Berto Alexander etc etc....

El Angel

Khan fought him at 140. Alexander fought him at his first fight at 147 for both guys. I'm not saying the weight is why Alexander dominated, but you gotta throw it in there if you're head to head comparing their performances. Khan also put Maidana down for a count, Alexander flat dominated him though and arguably put him down. I'll take Alexander's performance over Khan's.

Bushbaby

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rome-By-Ko

Hell no,I've always thought Bradley beats Khan and so does Bo..

I did however think Khan would beat Ortiz Berto Alexander etc etc....

I knew your math was off. I guess for whatever reason you somehow thought Bradley didn't fit in between 140-147 LOL!! Like I said Jangles thought Khan beats everyone between 140-147 not named Floyd or Pacman. Bradley would fit into that anywhere in between.

bojangles1987

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bushbaby

Jangles was one a dem that severly overrated Khan. At 1 time he straight said Khan beats everyone at 140-147 not named Floyd or Manny, wow. He didn't even beat Lamont!!

Not 140, 147. At 140 I've always backed Bradley against him, and I said Peterson could, though I picked Khan to pull it out. I've never said he was the best fighter at 140, not once, unless I said it out of anger that Bradley ducked him. You need to stop saying I thought he would smoke Lamont, I never once said that.

And I'm sticking by saying he'd beat everyone at 147 not named Floyd or Manny, because as I keep saying Bradley and Lamont are at least as good as everyone there except Floyd and Manny.

Walt Liquor the opposite of pure Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: East Broward Posts: 32,744 Rep Power: 95 Points: 10,482,500,135,021.88 Bank: 3,519,174,279,467.96 Total Points: 14,001,674,414,489.84 Donate	See bojanagles sig. Khan was definitely overrated though. Devon came in with am efferective gameplan and stuck to it. Khan loses his wits and seems to shut down at least once a fight for a couple rounds.

Money_May Undisputed Champion Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: London, England Age: 24 Posts: 11,653 Rep Power: 42 Points: 779,698,495,562.34 Bank: 59,998,797,317,862.56 Total Points: 60,778,495,813,424.91 Donate	Styles make fights and triangle theories don't work. Khan beat kotelnik Devon struggled with him. Maidana beat Ortiz but lost to khan. Ortiz drew with Peterson but lamont beat khan. Don't mean *****. The only guy in that division who hasn't struggled is Bradley but he didn't fight khan which could have been his tough not to crack

El Angel Team Cotto Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 9,152 Rep Power: 33 Points: 856.56 Bank: 13,651,580,263,066.47 Total Points: 13,651,580,263,923.03 Donate	Khan fought him at 140. Alexander fought him at his first fight at 147 for both guys. I'm not saying the weight is why Alexander dominated, but you gotta throw it in there if you're head to head comparing their performances. Khan also put Maidana down for a count, Alexander flat dominated him though and arguably put him down. I'll take Alexander's performance over Khan's.