Who's more dangerous? Bradley or Canelo?

[Bushbaby]

Originally Posted by boogybro

Canelo has style?

Sure he does, no headmovement, hirrid footwork & stamina & has the resume of a fringe contender to boot!!

[-Lowkey-]

Neither Bradley or Alvarez deserve a mega fight I think that much is obvious.

There both getting a short cut to the biggest pay days in boxing without deserving it.

Bradley just beat a 40 year old lightweight in Casamayor and Alvarez just beat shot to **** Cintron. Now they both land mega fights?

Neither have a chance but I would say Canelo is the more dangerous he at least has a size advantage over Floyd and has good power. Bradley doesn't even have a slight punchers chance.

I don't like either fight the fans are losing out again.

[Tamis!]

Originally Posted by -Lowkey-

Neither Bradley or Alvarez deserve a mega fight I think that much is obvious.

There both getting a short cut to the biggest pay days in boxing without deserving it.

Bradley just beat a 40 year old lightweight in Casamayor and Alvarez just beat shot to **** Cintron. Now they both land mega fights?

Neither have a chance but I would say Canelo is the more dangerous he at least has a size advantage over Floyd and has good power. Bradley doesn't even have a slight punchers chance.

I don't like either fight the fans are losing out again.

How can we have new future faces of boxing with that kind of mentality always?

And the TS is asking who's the more dangerous "STYLISTICALLY"! Not who's bigger than who, stronger than who and other ***** you guys make up just to hype up your bets.

[BoxingGenius27]

Originally Posted by Tamis_Siensya

I'll give you that coz eversince you spoke highly of Alvarez, even though to me he is highly unproven.

What is funny are the others who have Canelo suddenly as a dangerous threat to Floyd.

No, the question has been asked as of late "who poses more of a threat; Bradley to Pac, or Canelo to Mayweather".

No one is saying that they think Canelo will win. What they're saying is "if they had to choose", Canelo poses more of a threat to Mayweather, than Bradley does to Pac, even though Bradley is the more proven fighter.

Comprende?

[BoxingGenius27]

For the record, Canelo needs to fight Kirkland before he does anything.

If this Mayweather fight doesn't happen, whichi I hope it doesnt, I can see him fighting the next loser in any bout at 154.

[Tamis!]

Originally Posted by BoxingGenius27

No, the question has been asked as of late "who poses more of a threat; Bradley to Pac, or Canelo to Mayweather".

No one is saying that they think Canelo will win. What they're saying is "if they had to choose", Canelo poses more of a threat to Mayweather, than Bradley does to Pac, even though Bradley is the more proven fighter.

Comprende?

The TS is saying in the OP who's more dangerous stylistically.

If he's saying who is more dangerous overall then that's different, and that's where most people tend to answer.

I answered burner on a premise that goes wayback with a convo we had, so STFU coz you don't know what it is in the 1st place.

[Big Dunn]

Bradley is more dangerous because he uses his head effectively. He has a better chance of beating Manny then Canelo does of beating Floyd.

[The Weebler II]

Originally Posted by -Lowkey-

Neither Bradley or Alvarez deserve a mega fight I think that much is obvious.

There both getting a short cut to the biggest pay days in boxing without deserving it.

Bradley just beat a 40 year old lightweight in Casamayor and Alvarez just beat shot to **** Cintron. Now they both land mega fights?

Neither have a chance but I would say Canelo is the more dangerous he at least has a size advantage over Floyd and has good power. Bradley doesn't even have a slight punchers chance.

I don't like either fight the fans are losing out again.

yes and no, Bradley is the best opponent for Pacquiao outside of Mayweather (and Martinez)

[Tamis!]

Originally Posted by Big Dunn

Bradley is more dangerous because he uses his head effectively. He has a better chance of beating Manny then Canelo does of beating Floyd.

These mofos say over the years that Pac has problems with opponents with good movement, and Bradley had those.

Now compared to Floyd-Canelo, they quickly abandon that thought and are now sayng Bradley doesn't have a chance, and that Floyd will have problems with a hungry young cob in Canelo.

[-Lowkey-]

Originally Posted by Tamis_Siensya

How can we have new future faces of boxing with that kind of mentality always?

And the TS is asking who's the more dangerous "STYLISTICALLY"! Not who's bigger than who, stronger than who and other ***** you guys make up just to hype up your bets.

I don't think its to much to ask for a fighter to prove his worth before he is able to receive the biggest pay days available in boxing.

Again Alvarez is imo the more dangerous like I stated I don't think either stand a realistic chance and although Bradley is the better fighter of the two, Alvarez at least has a small punchers chance Bradley doesn't even posses that.